9/11 Conspiracy Thread

#476
#476
Pacer92 said:
Professionals that have forgotten more about physics than you will ever know, lay out the visual evidence for you in these videos that you refuse to watch...

Yep, they're the dumb ones...
Click to expand...

Just because someone is smart and has credentials doesn't mean they can't believe in some really stupid crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#479
#479
Pacer92 said:
Yep, he's an idiot. Basing his theory off of nothing!

You guys refuse to question anything. No wonder they got away it...sheep always follow..
Click to expand...

So I guess I need to take the credentialed scientists who are hardcore young Earth creationists seriously then?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#480
#480
Pacer92 said:
See, you guys refuse to comprehend anything different bc your belief is ruled by emotion. You only see what you want to see..
Click to expand...

There's nothing to see. There's no content. It's a bunch of statements with no context. It leaves the viewer to completely fill in the context, and it depends on someone who already has your predisposition to believe in a conspiracy to fill in the gaps with your preexisting assumptions.

It doesn't actually say anything, let alone offer proof.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#481
#481
bamawriter said:
There's nothing to see. There's no content. It's a bunch of statements with no context. It leaves the viewer to completely fill in the context, and it depends on someone who already has your predisposition to believe in a conspiracy to fill in the gaps with your preexisting assumptions.

It doesn't actually say anything, let alone offer proof.
Click to expand...

Did you watch the whole thing? No, you watched 3 minutes max. The parts of other planes crashing and ripping apart like an aluminum can?

Where is the wreckage from flight 93? Where are the bodies? Where is anything resembling a crash site...the plane of all things?

Where are the bodies, the seats and luggage at the Pentagon....the debris?

Where is a pic of a "plane" hitting the Pentagon?

Answer these questions...
 
#482
#482
Pacer92 said:
Did you watch the whole thing? No, you watched 3 minutes max.
Click to expand...

I watched 8 minutes.

The parts of other planes crashing and ripping apart like an aluminum can?
Click to expand...

Well, a large percentage of the material used to build an airplane is, in fact, aluminum.

Where is the wreckage from flight 93? Where are the bodies? Where is anything resembling a crash site...the plane of all things?
Click to expand...

Where is it now? The FBI took most of the debris. Some of it was entered into evidence at the Moussaoui trial. The remains that could be identified with the victims were released to their families. The remains that were identified with the hijackers were also kept by the FBI as evidence.

Where are the bodies, the seats and luggage at the Pentagon....the debris?
Click to expand...

Same as above.

Where is a pic of a "plane" hitting the Pentagon?
Click to expand...

0911-approaching.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#483
#483
bamawriter said:
I watched 8 minutes.



Well, a large percentage of the material used to build an airplane is, in fact, aluminum.



Where is it now? The FBI took most of the debris. Some of it was entered into evidence at the Moussaoui trial. The remains that could be identified with the victims were released to their families. The remains that were identified with the hijackers were also kept by the FBI as evidence.



Same as above.



0911-approaching.jpg
Click to expand...

Watch the rest....actually from about 8:30 on...

Exactly, they are alluminum....you'll be enlightened on how alluminum reacts to hitting steel.

They are thin walled alluminum at that. They react to hitting steel like the fiber glass and alluminum bodies indy cars do to the wall....
 
#484
#484
Pacer92 said:
Watch the rest....actually from about 8:30 on...

Exactly, they are alluminum....you'll be enlightened on how alluminum reacts to hitting steel.

They are thin walled alluminum at that. They react to hitting steel like the fiber glass and alluminum bodies indy cars do to the wall....
Click to expand...

This is another example of making a statement that is accurate, but irrelevant.

Yes, aluminum will crumple when impacting steel. But the planes didn't simply hit steel. They hit a whole bunch of glass and air.

This is why the Pentagon wasn't as damaged as the towers: more steel and concrete at the point of impact.
 
#485
#485
Pacer92 said:
Watch the rest....actually from about 8:30 on...

Exactly, they are alluminum....you'll be enlightened on how alluminum reacts to hitting steel.

They are thin walled alluminum at that. They react to hitting steel like the fiber glass and alluminum bodies indy cars do to the wall....
Click to expand...

Are you saying that if an Indy car went head on into the catch fence at several hundred mph the it wouldn't go through the fence?

Honestly where do you get this stuff that a jet liner running into a building wouldn't do exactly what we saw happen?
 
#486
#486
bamawriter said:
This is another example of making a statement that is accurate, but irrelevant.

Yes, aluminum will crumple when impacting steel. But the planes didn't simply hit steel. They hit a whole bunch of glass and air.

This is why the Pentagon wasn't as damaged as the towers: more steel and concrete at the point of impact.
Click to expand...

staggering ain't it?

add the explosion from the impact.
 
#487
#487
volinbham said:
Are you saying that if an Indy car went head on into the catch fence at several hundred mph the it wouldn't go through the fence?

Honestly where do you get this stuff that a jet liner running into a building wouldn't do exactly what we saw happen?
Click to expand...

Catch fence versus the world trade center? Lol

Pass me some...



Watch the whole video....
 
#489
#489
bamawriter said:
This is another example of making a statement that is accurate, but irrelevant.

Yes, aluminum will crumple when impacting steel. But the planes didn't simply hit steel. They hit a whole bunch of glass and air.

This is why the Pentagon wasn't as damaged as the towers: more steel and concrete at the point of impact.
Click to expand...

Alluminum that's 3/16 of an inch thick doesn't punch thru steel columns ...
 
#492
#492
Pacer92 said:
Alluminum that's 3/16 of an inch thick doesn't punch thru steel columns ...
Click to expand...

Once again, making a true statement with no relevancy.

No, the planes did not "punch thru steel columns." What they did was compromise the connections that held the columns together, and the resulting explosion and fire proceeded to compromise them further until the compromise was fatal.

You might as well be saying "The sun rises in the East, so 9/11 must have been a controlled demolition." The original statement is true, but has absolutely no relevancy to the conclusion.
 
#495
#495
hndog609 said:
Do you think a .45 ACP could take a Sith Goblin or would we be needing at least a .44 Mag?
Click to expand...

Depends, we talkin' hardball or some bonded JHP?

Three things that have made me chuckle today. Your post, Pacer's incessant trolling/petty insults and this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEQuDyuQFKE

You can tell the bird on the left is the girl bird and the one on the right is the guy. "I can't take you anywhere without you actin' the fool..."
 
#497
#497
Pacer92 said:
What's entertaining is your slap on the back atta boys, without bringing anything substantiinal but your emotional self.....
Click to expand...

I'm fairly positive I've added more to this thread than you have.

And you still won't answer the tough questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#498
#498
Grand Vol said:
Depends, we talkin' hardball or some bonded JHP?

Three things that have made me chuckle today. Your post, Pacer's incessant trolling/petty insults and this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEQuDyuQFKE

You can tell the bird on the left is the girl bird and the one on the right is the guy. "I can't take you anywhere without you actin' the fool..."
Click to expand...

Hmmm, good question. Mithril tipped maybe?

And that cockatoo is pretty hilarious. On a side note while only shown briefly that guy singing looks a LOT like Dr Cox from Scrubs to me.
 
#499
#499
hndog609 said:
Hmmm, good question. Mithril tipped maybe?

And that cockatoo is pretty hilarious. On a side note while only shown briefly that guy singing looks a LOT like Dr Cox from Scrubs to me.
Click to expand...

I see a B movie once where the bad guys used ice bullets.
 
#500
#500
bamawriter said:
I haven't watched them all. Most of the videos I've watched claim to quote the above, but don't actually feature their statements. But perhaps you can link to a few that do.

To answer your question in general terms: yes, the likelihood of them being wrong is much, much, much greater than the likelihood of them being correct.
Click to expand...

Why is it more likely that they are wrong? Why is it that the ones who agree with the governements assesments are more correct? There have been scientists from very reputable universities like MIT that have called the NIST report and the governements official theory about what happened on 9/11 into questions. So why are people like those wrong? What if everything we have been told about 9/11 is a lie? The governement has lied to us many times in the past. Can you honestly say with any certainty that they are not lying about 9/11?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top