volprof
Destroyer of Nihilists
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2011
- Messages
- 18,154
- Likes
- 10,067
C'mon man...there's driving propeller chickens and jet chickens...not even CLOSE to the same thing.
And if you haven't already grokked it yet the piloting of the planes was actually done by...of course...Sith Goblins.
Depends on if you get a Spider Jedi in the mix or not. I mean, I bet a Spider Jedi hopped up on Sprittle would be able to drive either one of the chickens. Of course, working with the Sith Goblin would be a daunting task to overcome, but if Todd the Wraith and Lieutenant Colonel John Sheppard can team up to beat the Replicators, I would assume the Spider Jedi and Sith Goblin can team up to destroy computers in the Pentagon.
You love feeding that troll...
At this point it's not even enjoyable to debate him. It's one thing when someone's wrong about something, and they've just fed into their own confirmation bias. But it was laid out for him that a source he had trusted was lying. And the fact that he trusted the source without checking its sources is no huge deal. It's a mistake, but we all do that every now and then. But once his source's lie was exposed, the only appropriate response is "Oops. Looks like I was wrong about that." He could even continue to say "they may have had quite a bit of training, but I still don't think they could have pulled it off." But once he continued to repeat what he now knew was a lie, he became a liar.
I have been pretty darn polite thru most of this thread. But once someone starts unashamedly lying because he's too dishonest or dimwitted to do anything else, I'm done with politeness.
At this point it's not even enjoyable to debate him. It's one thing when someone's wrong about something, and they've just fed into their own confirmation bias. But it was laid out for him that a source he had trusted was lying. And the fact that he trusted the source without checking its sources is no huge deal. It's a mistake, but we all do that every now and then. But once his source's lie was exposed, the only appropriate response is "Oops. Looks like I was wrong about that." He could even continue to say "they may have had quite a bit of training, but I still don't think they could have pulled it off." But once he continued to repeat what he now knew was a lie, he became a liar.
I have been pretty darn polite thru most of this thread. But once someone starts unashamedly lying because he's too dishonest or dimwitted to do anything else, I'm done with politeness.
Isn't it the most American exceptionalist thing to do to say that something like 9-11 "couldn't have been done by a bunch of brown, towel-heads; therefore, it had to be us!"?
I call this new trend in American exceptionalism "anti-exceptionalism." In many ways, it's actually much more extreme; certainly more perfidious. It goes under the guise of being objective, non-nationalistic, and reasonable, yet, if you look closely, the fundamental tenets of exceptionalism are still there: basically that the US is an essentially unique country preeminent among the rest and the only one capable of national sovereignty; everyone else is just passively observing.
Reaching out for boyfriends. You have no debate. Its liar or nothing. Bring something of substance. Bring your womanly self....
Reaching out for boyfriends. You have no debate. Its liar or nothing. Bring something of substance. Bring your womanly self....
I would say that, since I live in Franklin, I'm at most 15 to 20 minutes away from you. So you could easily come get the fight you're jabbering about.
But then you're probably lying about living in Brentwood, so it's probably pointless.
Have a good night, Pinocchio.