9/11 Conspiracy Thread

#1,251
#1,251
Grand Vol said:
I feel like dropping several empty beer cans when I read Ras's posts.
Click to expand...

Typical response from the peanut gallery. Let's not address the issues, let's just throw our (slightly) witty responses and insults.

You haven't changed a bit and you don't disappoint.
 
#1,254
#1,254
tumscalcium said:
I do. My example referenced my point. Yours had nothing to do with this point.

As Grand has stated. You're simply trolling or you've dug way too deep to get yourself out.
Click to expand...

Then explain to me what heat transfer, statics/dynamics and materials science have to do with comparing the human body or a glass table to steel/metal structures?

If you can't even compare apples to apples, them perhaps it is yourself that needs to be called the troll or intellectually inferior.
 
#1,255
#1,255
Rasputin_Vol said:
Then explain to me what heat transfer, statics/dynamics and materials science have to do with comparing the human body or a glass table to steel/metal structures?

If you can't even compare apples to apples, them perhaps it is yourself that needs to be called the troll or intellectually inferior.
Click to expand...

I said all the recent examples don't have to do with floors on a large building.

I already said it.

I already said it.

I already says it.

Troll harder. You're losing it.
 
#1,256
#1,256
tumscalcium said:
I said all the recent examples don't have to do with floors on a large building.

I already said it.

I already said it.

I already says it.

Troll harder. You're losing it.
Click to expand...

Then you need to be quiet and let the rest of us have this discussion. If you can't add anything that is relevant to the conversation, then why are you here? Unless you are trolling...
 
#1,257
#1,257
Rasputin_Vol said:
Me using real building materials in my comparison vs some one else using the human body and a glass table is me trolling?

Interesting. Maybe you do need that beer after all.
Click to expand...

You're using steel as a baseline.

Do you know just how many types of steel there are? And whether or not shipping containers are built from the same materials is kind of relevant. And we're not even going to get into construction methods that really make your analogy moot.

Shipping containers = stacked.

Buildings...built.
 
#1,258
#1,258
Grand Vol said:
You're using steel as a baseline.

Do you know just how many types of steel there are? And whether or not shipping containers are built from the same materials is kind of relevant. And we're not even going to get into construction methods that really make your analogy moot.

Shipping containers = stacked.

Buildings...built.
Click to expand...

I was at least in the ballpark compared to these other clowns using the human body and a glass table.

And yes, I am fully aware that there are different types of steel. I've already gone over my credentials before. No need for me to prove anymore to you or the rest of these clowns.
 
#1,259
#1,259
tumscalcium said:
Those examples included you're retarded one as well.
Click to expand...

Only in response to you all throwing out ridiculous examples. I even stated that "a better example" would be container ships... but I didn't say it was the perfect example.

Reading comprehension is your friend.
 
#1,261
#1,261
Rasputin_Vol said:
I was at least in the ballpark compared to these other clowns using the human body and a glass table.

And yes, I am fully aware that there are different types of steel. I've already gone over my credentials before. No need for me to prove anymore to you or the rest of these clowns.
Click to expand...

Your credentials include:

YouTube videos

Conspiracy theory sites

Charlie Sheen

A massive Israeli-Saudi-CIA plot

Among others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#1,262
#1,262
ajvol01 said:
A = maximum load the angle clips could hold without failure

B = combined weight of the floors above the first floor that failed

What happens when B > A?
Click to expand...

For the material glass, it will break.

For steel and metals, they will most likely bend/yield.
 
#1,267
#1,267
Grand Vol said:
So you're trolling...
Click to expand...

I love how you can throw out this assertion when you have about as many posts as I do in only half the number of years. And most of your posts are worthless. At least I bring facts and put my neck on the line with predictions that seem to always (95% success rate) come true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,268
#1,268
Rasputin_Vol said:
I love how you can throw out this assertion when you have about as many posts as I do in only have the number of years. And most of your posts are worthless. At least I bring facts and put my neck on the line with predictions that seem to always (95% success rate) come true.
Click to expand...

I point this out as most of the questions you are asking as of late have been answered already.

Yet you ask them again as if the data will change.

So you are either:

A: Trolling

B: Legitimately just don't get it

Pick one. There is no option C here.
 
#1,270
#1,270
Grand Vol said:
I point this out as most of the questions you are asking as of late have been answered already.

Yet you ask them again as if the data will change.

So you are either:

A: Trolling

B: Legitimately just don't get it

Pick one. There is no option C here.
Click to expand...
Option C is "you all are the ones that are wrong and confused".

Again, get your laughs in now while you still can. But when you find yourself on the wrong side of history, I'll be right here to remind you of all of the trash you spewed leading up to the truth being revealed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,272
#1,272
hndog609 said:
Extremely clear explanations of the WTC collapse that have already been posted earlier in this thread.

https://youtu.be/bMZ-nkYr46w

https://youtu.be/p-UZoNqluFs
Click to expand...

It did nothing to debunk anything I've said. In fact, it actually did mention the same thing that I have been saying before regarding asymmetrical damage of the towers (bowing and deflecting of the tower and the fires being more heavily concentrated in specific areas).

However, it did not explain how this asymmetrical damage caused symmetrical failure. And it glosses over the notion about the metal going from yielding to critical failure without describing how the floors below could have possibly not been able to at the very least yielded or bent as the floors above crashed down upon them.
 
#1,273
#1,273
Ras, can you offer any undisputable proof to your conspiracy theory? Do you believe you will ever be able to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt? If not, why do you continue to argue the case? Just believe what you're gonna believe, proof be damned, but stop posting about it.
 
#1,274
#1,274
Rasputin_Vol said:
It did nothing to debunk anything I've said. In fact, it actually did mention the same thing that I have been saying before regarding asymmetrical damage of the towers (bowing and deflecting of the tower and the fires being more heavily concentrated in specific areas).

However, it did not explain how this asymmetrical damage caused symmetrical failure. And it glosses over the notion about the metal going from yielding to critical failure without describing how the floors below could have possibly not been able to at the very least yielded or bent as the floors above crashed down upon them.
Click to expand...

Everything is explained... and that's not even the real detailed explanations. The key is that it is absolutely, positively, 100% scientifically viable that the towers fell in exactly the "accepted" manner. This was all covered in many posts earlier which is the other "key" element here, nothing has changed since the last time that was pointed out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,275
#1,275
As far as Saudi Arabia goes, it wouldn't surprise me if some of the royal family was involved in funding 9/11. Do you realize how large the royal family is? That doesn't mean those in actual power knew anything or funded anything.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top