Ned Ray McWorkher
Custom User Title
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
- Messages
- 14,436
- Likes
- 6,040
Anyone with a copy of Microsoft flight simulator could have done it. ANYONE.
Flying is easy, landing are trickier but still relatively simple with the use of ILS. Of course, they didn't have to do that.
All they had to do was fly to a general vicinity and the hone in on the tallest buying. They trained as pilots, but six weeks with MS flight simulator and you're good.
Fun fact: MS Flight Sim took the trade center buildings out of the game so people wouldn't recreate the flight of the terrorists.
Another question: Are you claiming these hijackers used a simulator? No simulator was mentioned that the hijackers had in their possession. (Home, work, wherever)
It's amazing again that lots of (more) experience pilots used a simulator to recreate the flight path of these planes and they had problems.
Go ahead and make that assumption then.
Every community needs a herd of sheep.
9/11 - Hard Facts, Hard Truth | The Pentagon
Good read on the Pentagon.
Something that's not mentioned here is why did the FBI confiscate 84 of the 85 videos of the pentagon plane strike? The one we all know and have seen has a frame missing, why? The Sheraton Hotel, a Citgo gas station, and Doubletree hotels videos were all confiscated and never release. Why?
Is it really that hard to provide a link? If it is, why do you think that is?
In OB's defense, there is a lot of sites and links out there that if you go into it with an open mind you can come to your own conclusions instead of believing what you hear on the news and from the govt. there's just too much info to go thru and raises a lot of questions for more research.
Come on ob, I'm as trusting of the government as huff or defend these days and am open to the possibility of 9/11 being more than meets the eye but when you make an assertion, the burden of proof is on you. Telling someone to Google it when they're asking for proof is about the same level of idiocy as the tumblr feminists demanding you "educate yourself, ****lord."
Look at a map of Manhattan. I think that if you are flying south at 800 feet it would be hard NOT to have hit those buildings. The one thing I think a little "remarkable" was the steep turn one took at the end. But at that point, he was target fixated. Make no mistake, these guys were well trained to do exactly what they did. They also got real lucky with the weather and the fact that both hit their targets. Conspiracy theories are just redonkulous.The way the city is designed you could use it very easily like a run way. It guides you right in. I am sure as you fly low that target gets quite big. I would love Space Coasts opinion on this
They were also drunk when they tried it. This was not that difficult.
I have a lot of time in 767s though.
I'm glad you have weighed in on this.
The footage I watched showed both pilots such as yourself and USAF pilots attempting the same route that pilot took to hit the pentagon. None of them were able to do it. I do not know if the testing was manipulated to show a bias. I just know that I have no idea if the actual route taken was a real possibility.
In your opinion, what is the probability of that pilot hitting the pentagon with the success he had on his first attempt?