cotton
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2005
- Messages
- 11,216
- Likes
- 9
Agreed. Should be bunkers inside the ropes and a waste area anywhere that a patron can walk.
I saw an explanation as to why this was considered and rejected. There would have been bunkers divided, with parts inside the rope and parts outside; how do you play that?
The final consideration seems to have been a fear of confusing players even further. If some bunkers are bunkers and others are not, or if the south section of a bunker and the north is waste, players could have been even more confused. I'm not sure I totally agree, but I do understand why they chose to call every man-made sandy spot a sand trap.
It's just bad for the PGA for something like this to happen.
On that we agree. Nobody--players, fans, or the PGA--wanted to see this ending. However, I'm not sure what would have made it better. A rules official telling Johnson, "Hey, you are in a trap," would have prevented this problem, but are rules officials really supposed to follow folks around and tell them when they are in a trap?
Instead, they tried to inform every player, in multiple ways, that basically everything that might be a trap was a trap.