Mccage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2016
- Messages
- 4,738
- Likes
- 7,027
It is just moving forward in this day and time.You are not the only one
I assure you. Getting kind of
Depressing to be honest about it.
I don't disagree with you but we have no idea what some of these NFL QB are receiving in NIL like $$$$ through endorsements. Salaries yes but NIL or endorsements are two different animals. The Minister of Defense and Campbells suit.I hope the NCAA stays with more stringent guidelines on NIL and the transfer portal. I can’t stand this out of hand Wild Wild West in college sports. Like someone said when the NFL starting QB in the Super Bowl is making less than a large number of starting QBs in college….there is just something wrong. Those that can’t see that just have an agenda.
What part of NCAA interference in NIL is illegal under federal law es sues you?I hope the NCAA stays with more stringent guidelines on NIL and the transfer portal. I can’t stand this out of hand Wild Wild West in college sports. Like someone said when the NFL starting QB in the Super Bowl is making less than a large number of starting QBs in college….there is just something wrong. Those that can’t see that just have an agenda.
The schools have to cover the medical costs for any injuries the athlete has in practice, workouts, travel, or games.I remember during his time here, Peyton took out insurance for the event of an injury; he (his family) had to pay for this coverage out of pocket.
You do know that if the NCAA wins this, TN is going to get the death penalty for doing what everyone else is getting away with in college FB?I hope the NCAA stays with more stringent guidelines on NIL and the transfer portal. I can’t stand this out of hand Wild Wild West in college sports. Like someone said when the NFL starting QB in the Super Bowl is making less than a large number of starting QBs in college….there is just something wrong. Those that can’t see that just have an agenda.
The schools have to cover the medical costs for any injuries the athlete has in practice, workouts, travel, or games.
The insurance the Mannings got for Peyton wasn't for medical care costs. It was to insure that he would have plenty of money if he was injured and couldn't play in the NFL.
That's a textbook anticompetitive business practice.
You're telling all the schools: we need to make sure none of you guys are too good at this. You even say this directly: "to make sure it cannot be overdone."
Can a city stipulate that no business in their town can make more than $1M / yr "so no one overdoes it?" It's illegal.
I'm sorry you hate the American system where cleverness, efficiency, and yes .... capital are good things.
There's a few reasons it's called capitalism.
I am not so sure about that because it is Rampant. I don't think the NCAA is going to win this anyway with Antitrust laws in the picture, no guidance and rule changes in play. Add to it State Law can sometimes get an Appeal over Federal Law.You do know that if the NCAA wins this, TN is going to get the death penalty for doing what everyone else is getting away with in college FB?
Agree. I truly believe that the NCAA wanted total power and control over NIL from a governance stance. Problems were they had no plan to do, no staffing to support, no firm rules in place and no reasoning to do so.Salary caps in every pro league beg to differ! Roster limits in every pro and college sport also! We also have monopoly prevention in the business world. Influence peddling is not warmly welcomed either. You are way overplaying and misplaying the AMERICAN WAY card. Managing and balancing, rather than fighting NIL will be the move after they give up the fight to eliminate or limit it.
What part of Antitrust Law Exemption are you just ignoring at this point.Salary caps in every pro league beg to differ! Roster limits in every pro and college sport also! We also have monopoly prevention in the business world. Influence peddling is not warmly welcomed either. You are way overplaying and misplaying the AMERICAN WAY card. Managing and balancing, rather than fighting NIL will be the move after they give up the fight to eliminate or limit it.
What part of college football not being a pro league escapes you? What part of there being zero college athlete salaries to cap did you miss? What part of NIL endorse wants not being salaries did you miss? What part of there being no legal caps on endorsement money other that what the market will bear did you miss?Salary caps in every pro league beg to differ! Roster limits in every pro and college sport also! We also have monopoly prevention in the business world. Influence peddling is not warmly welcomed either. You are way overplaying and misplaying the AMERICAN WAY card. Managing and balancing, rather than fighting NIL will be the move after they give up the fight to eliminate or limit it.
The NCAA isn't going to win. They've lost every major case about NIL, athlete benefits, and transfers. They have so many lawsuits stacked up against them that they don't even have enough lawyers to defend them all.You do know that if the NCAA wins this, TN is going to get the death penalty for doing what everyone else is getting away with in college FB?
NO professionalism was easier to oversee than valid money through professionalism. They tried to fight the old fight and lost and are now trying to pivot the no HS provisions since it would be easier to oversee impact on ONLY those moving through the portal to NEARLY EVERY player entering the college experience through signing days. Don't see a legal basis for that flying either. Having to keep NIL score on every player will be a job, but the only option left. Can't imagine a player getting NIL without a written document defining dollars and dates. It simply will have to be reported to the NCAA to know how many dollars and which season, by sport. Would make sense to apply the BEAR rule on schollies to NIL.... if you are on the football roster, water polo or golf money would count against the football cap. The only good news would be with legal ways to get money to players, under the table money would have even less wiggle room for serious slapping.Agree. I truly believe that the NCAA wanted total power and control over NIL from a governance stance. Problems were they had no plan to do, no staffing to support, no firm rules in place and no reasoning to do so.
Instead of sitting down and working with the major conferences, the NCAA ran to Congress and SCOTUS first. Something a Child would do like running to momma thinking she is going to clear it up for them.
How stupid and greedy and inept display of how weak the NCAA is in Today's College world. In essence, they have exposed themselves and fired a Nuke that landed in their backyard and not the intended area they wanted.
Dude, give it up. What you are advocating us flatly illegal, as several of us have repeatedly told you. The NCAA CANNOT interfere in a business agreement between two other private parties. There is no legal way to cap NIL. You have zero credibility on this issue.NO professionalism was easier to oversee than valid money through professionalism. They tried to fight the old fight and lost and are now trying to pivot the no HS provisions since it would be easier to oversee impact on ONLY those moving through the portal to NEARLY EVERY player entering the college experience through signing days. Don't see a legal basis for that flying either. Having to keep NIL score on every player will be a job, but the only option left. Can't imagine a player getting NIL without a written document defining dollars and dates. It simply will have to be reported to the NCAA to know how many dollars and which season, by sport. Would make sense to apply the BEAR rule on schollies to NIL.... if you are on the football roster, water polo or golf money would count against the football cap. The only good news would be with legal ways to get money to players, under the table money would have even less wiggle room for serious slapping.
"Having to keep NIL score on every player....."NO professionalism was easier to oversee than valid money through professionalism. They tried to fight the old fight and lost and are now trying to pivot the no HS provisions since it would be easier to oversee impact on ONLY those moving through the portal to NEARLY EVERY player entering the college experience through signing days. Don't see a legal basis for that flying either. Having to keep NIL score on every player will be a job, but the only option left. Can't imagine a player getting NIL without a written document defining dollars and dates. It simply will have to be reported to the NCAA to know how many dollars and which season, by sport. Would make sense to apply the BEAR rule on schollies to NIL.... if you are on the football roster, water polo or golf money would count against the football cap. The only good news would be with legal ways to get money to players, under the table money would have even less wiggle room for serious slapping.
Alabama insured Bryce Young with "loss of draft and future value" insurance so he wouldn't worry playing in the CFP. I believe they insured other high round draft picks also.I remember during his time here, Peyton took out insurance for the event of an injury; he (his family) had to pay for this coverage out of pocket.
Non profit means very little in the NCAA issues. UT is not for profit as are most, if not all, public schools.The NCAA is a non-profit organization. Should they be classified as such? How much money does the NCAA make at the expense of its members? So they cannot cut into NIL and their profits go to Rent, staffing, Utilities and operating expenses. Where does the extra go? There profits should go to its members, correct or incorrect? Aren't players Members? Emmert saw the writing on the wall and got out. Now they are holding on by a thread.