voldawgforever
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2011
- Messages
- 5,852
- Likes
- 1,084
I'd rather not have them or A&M. I don't like the fact that by bailing on their conference they'll reap the rewards that the 12 member institutions have worked for so long to achieve in this one.
Mizzou is exploring options..... which means they're leaving the Big 12 for sure.
Not sure the SEC is a slam dunk though. Look for the Big 10 to enter the picture --- at least to talk to them. The Big 10 would have to feel uncomfortable with the SEC gaining TV market share ( St Louis & KC ) so close to their territory.
I'm a traditionalist, I hate all this expansion..... but as a Kansas Citian I would love to have Mizzou in the SEC which would mean SEC coverage here in KC.
There is a lot of consternation here in KC over Mizzou leaving the Big 12 ---- probably means the loss of the Big 12 basketball tournament at the Sprint Center and the Big 12 football championship at Arrowhead ...a financial blow to the city.
Thought the Big 12 football championship game was played at Cowboys stadium?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I'd rather not have them or A&M. I don't like the fact that by bailing on their conference they'll reap the rewards that the 12 member institutions have worked for so long to achieve in this one.
i can understand people being opposed to expansion for a variety of reasons. there are several aspects about expansion that i do not like either.
however, the business aspect is undeniable.
i do not understand how there are people out there that speak as if the sec is a charitable institution that is making a sacrifice by expanding and is simply doing the schools they are adding a big favor.
12 university presidents would not choose to expand if it meant losing money.
that's one of the reasons the whole "super conference" thing isn't going to happen. there are only a couple of schools out there in unstable conferences or who are independent that would increase the pot for the league they join.
i can understand people being opposed to expansion for a variety of reasons. there are several aspects about expansion that i do not like either.
however, the business aspect is undeniable.
i do not understand how there are people out there that speak as if the sec is a charitable institution that is making a sacrifice by expanding and is simply doing the schools they are adding a big favor.
12 university presidents would not choose to expand if it meant losing money.
that's one of the reasons the whole "super conference" thing isn't going to happen. there are only a couple of schools out there in unstable conferences or who are independent that would increase the pot for the league they join.
i can understand people being opposed to expansion for a variety of reasons. there are several aspects about expansion that i do not like either.
however, the business aspect is undeniable.
i do not understand how there are people out there that speak as if the sec is a charitable institution that is making a sacrifice by expanding and is simply doing the schools they are adding a big favor.
12 university presidents would not choose to expand if it meant losing money.
that's one of the reasons the whole "super conference" thing isn't going to happen. there are only a couple of schools out there in unstable conferences or who are independent that would increase the pot for the league they join.