Active shooter @ Joel Osteen's church

#176
#176
85SugarVol said:
A transgender male (biological female) would see themselves as male. An actual male.

So if they were attracted to women, as a male (their correct self), they would likely consider themselves heterosexual.

But it can be complicated -

Elliot Page (bio female - girl from Juno) is a trans male that describes himself as queer. As Ellen Page he described himself as lesbian, and dated girls.
He now dates another transgender male (bio female) who also describes themself as queer. So 2 trans-masculine / non-binary (bio female), that both describe themselves as queer, dating one another.
Click to expand...
1707880242496.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Godfatha, Behr and InVOLuntary
#177
#177
Majors said:
Videos posted by LibsOf TikToc are not real? You keep saying tabloids/conspiracy, except it’s information pulled from social media accounts they view need attention.
Click to expand...
Often what they say happens in the videos is 100% not real, just like this "trans shooter". The whole "trans people are coming for your kids/oh no Pride Month!!!" garbage was a conspiracy theory that was en vogue among the dumbest people in America for like 3 months, then mostly disappeared. Just recently they made a big deal out of a picture of an all-female flight crew IIRC; the picture was real, the hysteria about how it meant DEI was making your plane crash was complete tabloid horse****.

One can find "a social media account" saying anything whatsoever, if you think that insulates them from being one of the most transparently agenda-driven sources around then you fit right in with the people that buy into that garbage
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#182
#182
NashVol11 said:
Often what they say happens in the videos is 100% not real, just like this "trans shooter". The whole "trans people are coming for your kids/oh no Pride Month!!!" garbage was a conspiracy theory that was en vogue among the dumbest people in America for like 3 months, then mostly disappeared. Just recently they made a big deal out of a picture of an all-female flight crew IIRC; the picture was real, the hysteria about how it meant DEI was making your plane crash was complete tabloid horse****.

One can find "a social media account" saying anything whatsoever, if you think that insulates them from being one of the most transparently agenda-driven sources around then you fit right in with the people that buy into that garbage
Click to expand...
So it’s the message again you don’t like. You can flip exactly what you said with the MSM and people buy it all the same. Media manipulation is real, which goes back to what I stated…think for yourself or be told what to believe. For years “respected journalist” pushed one sided agendas and fabricated stories as truth because of a candidate they rejected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, davethevol and BigOrangeTrain
#183
#183
Majors said:
So it’s the message again you don’t like. You can flip exactly what you said with the MSM and people buy it all the same. Media manipulation is real, which goes back to what I stated…think for yourself or be told what to believe. For years “respected journalist” pushed one sided agendas and fabricated stories as truth because of a candidate.
Click to expand...
If by "the message" you mean "complete agenda-driven unverified tabloid garbage that turns out to be false half the time and results in a bunch of bomb threats" then sure. The "controversy" about the all-female flight crew, which resulted in employees from that airline receiving a ton of harassment, was invented completely out of thin air because that's what Enquirer-esque tabloids do. On top of that, they were very transparently telling their followers what to believe which is the weirdest part of what you're saying
 
#184
#184
This is LibsOfTikTok. If you don't think that's "telling people what to believe" from what is otherwise a completely innocuous picture/post then I don't know what to tell you

4sldgadk4wbc1.jpeg
 
#186
#186
85SugarVol said:
Yeah I get it. It can get complicated when presented with over a dozen genders and even more sexual orientations.
Click to expand...
Actually it's not complicated at all for those of us who see through that bull ****. I don't care how many genders are "presented" to us, the actual reality is there are two, regardless of what the voices in these deranged people's heads are telling them! As for sexual orientation, what's so complicated? You either like dudes, chicks, or both.
 
#187
#187
What I find amazing is I’ve just read page after page of arguments on the validity of one news source , their reporting of the subject that either is or is not a dude who thinks they are a chick when she wants to be or not and not the fact that a bat sh!t crazy white / brown person took his / her child into a church with a long rifle / AR platform to kill a bunch of people because her neighbors said they/ them still thinks Hitler was right . Why are these people coming through our open border, why are they here , why do we lose track of them , and why isn’t everyone outraged over it ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#188
#188
NashVol11 said:
If by "the message" you mean "complete agenda-driven unverified tabloid garbage that turns out to be false half the time and results in a bunch of bomb threats" then sure. The "controversy" about the all-female flight crew, which resulted in employees from that airline receiving a ton of harassment, was invented completely out of thin air because that's what Enquirer-esque tabloids do. On top of that, they were very transparently telling their followers what to believe which is the weirdest part of what you're saying
Click to expand...
Summary..if it’s not news desk teleprompter read it’s tabloids. All female flight crew equal tabloids or steel dossier equals professional journalism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#189
#189
Majors said:
Summary..if it’s not news desk teleprompter read it’s tabloids. All female flight crew equal tabloids or steel dossier equals professional journalism.
Click to expand...
Like I said, you are having a conversation with yourself lol. It’s like talking to National Enquirer’s biggest fan and them trying to say “so everything’s a tabloid??????” No, your publication is just garbage
 
#190
#190
NashVol11 said:
Like I said, you are having a conversation with yourself lol. It’s like talking to National Enquirer’s biggest fan and them trying to say “so everything’s a tabloid??????” No, your publication is just garbage
Click to expand...
Tabloid response…you keep coming back. Only response is National Enquier because you’re a mainstream puppet.

Seems you don’t like the message because it’s not protected or edited by someone paid to protect the base. You’re triggered because it exposes folks to head in the sand topics. Remember, MSM ran Jussie Smollett attack as if it happened. Even got the WH to take action and respond on a lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#191
#191
Majors said:
Tabloid response…you keep coming back. Only response is National Enquier because you’re a mainstream puppet.

Seems you don’t like the message because it’s not protected or edited by someone paid to protect the base. You’re triggered because it exposes folks to head in the sand topics. Remember, MSM ran Jussie Smollett attack as if it happened. Even got the WH to take action and respond on a lie.
Click to expand...
No one is talking about the MSM but you lmao, might as well get your news from Alex Jones tweets or QAnon because they’re “unfiltered” and “expose people to head in the sand topics” and are similarly pure garbage
 
#192
#192
NashVol11 said:
No one is talking about the MSM but you lmao, might as well get your news from Alex Jones tweets or QAnon because they’re “unfiltered” and “expose people to head in the sand topics” and are similarly pure garbage
Click to expand...
Never listen to Jones and know very little about QAnon, but nice try. Why was the photo deleted? I’m sure you’ll say threats, but that’s majority of X post by any company.
 
#193
#193
Majors said:
Never listen to Jones and know very little about QAnon, but nice try.
Click to expand...
Why not? It’s unfiltered!!! All of the arguments you’re making for LoTT apply equally to those garbage sources, so what’s different?
Majors said:
Why was the photo deleted? I’m sure you’ll say threats, but that’s majority of X post by any company.
Click to expand...
The flight crew one? Southwest and its employees got a ton of harassment because of Chaya and IIRC had to shut off all comments/deactivate social media for a couple hours. Why do you think it was deleted?
 
#194
#194
NashVol11 said:
Why not? It’s unfiltered!!! All of the arguments you’re making for LoTT apply equally to those garbage sources, so what’s different?

The flight crew one? Southwest and its employees got a ton of harassment because of Chaya and IIRC had to shut off all comments/deactivate social media for a couple hours. Why do you think it was deleted?
Click to expand...
So they don’t believe in DEI and promoting their employees? Was it a troll post to the anti-woke crowd or was it a celebration of a crew worthy of the position. Had it been the later, not sure a delete would be warranted. Wasn’t LOTT created because of threats/exposing of a Chaya?
 
#195
#195
Majors said:
So they don’t believe in DEI and promoting their employees? Was it a troll post to the anti-woke crowd or was it a celebration of a crew worthy of the position. Had it been the later, not sure a delete would be warranted. Wasn’t LOTT created because of threats/exposing of a Chaya?
Click to expand...
They posted a picture of their first all-female flight crew and a bunch of the worst people on Earth started harassing them about DEI, releasing personal info and trying to “transvestigate” the people in the picture aka baselessly accuse them of being trans, all because of Chaya. And you think deleting the picture means Chaya was in the right? No wonder you buy into that dumbassery.

You also didn’t answer my first question: why don’t you like those other “unfiltered” sources? I assume that means that if someone said QAnon or Alex Jones is garbage (they are) you wouldn’t launch into your whole “you don’t like the message, you prefer to be told what to think by a news desk rather than really think for yourself with Alex Jones” lmaoooo
 
#197
#197
NashVol11 said:
They posted a picture of their first all-female flight crew and a bunch of the worst people on Earth started harassing them about DEI, releasing personal info and trying to “transvestigate” the people in the picture aka baselessly accuse them of being trans, all because of Chaya. And you think deleting the picture means Chaya was in the right? No wonder you buy into that dumbassery.

You also didn’t answer my first question: why don’t you like those other “unfiltered” sources? I assume that means that if someone said QAnon or Alex Jones is garbage (they are) you wouldn’t launch into your whole “you don’t like the message, you prefer to be told what to think by a news desk rather than really think for yourself with Alex Jones” lmaoooo
Click to expand...
Personal information like the creator of LoTT had done by WAPO. Didn’t say she was right, just the company not standing by their PR move. Did you have the same energy when Sandman was harassed, young chiefs fan accused of blackface? Probably not, wouldn’t fit a liberal agenda. Being threats of pictures.

Could be I don’t listen because I have no interest in listening. I’m pretty secure in where I get my news. Seems as though you partake or you wouldn’t keep going back to it. The insults tossed by you shows lack of depth and intelligence. Moving forward I should ask how you identify so I don’t offend you.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top