deezvols
4* lurker
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2009
- Messages
- 3,657
- Likes
- 5,681
And all discussions of electric pretty well ignore the resistance losses resulting in pushing electricity through hundreds of mile of wire to get it to the consumer. Fossil fuels get transported intact with every joule of stored energy is available to the end user. Electricity loses efficiency with every mile moved.
And what the loonies never are able to see is that dense, portable, and storable energy is what has enabled the human race to move from cave man status to our modern world of long life spans, comfort, and convenience. We can always find ways to use energy more efficiently; but any wholesale move toward using LESS energy must entail a regression in standard of living. Just like thermodynamics, it is an ironclad law. Energy replaces work. Reduce energy and everything goes to pot in very fast order. And at the present time, fossil fuels are the most portable, most storable energy sources with the greatest density of joules per unit mass (short of putting a compact nuclear reactor in your home or car that is)Exactly. In a way transmission of other fuels is still similar in that regard. We burn fuel to transport fossil fuels ... even pipelines require pumps to work. I still like what my thermodynamics prof used to say about the first two rules of thermodynamics. You can't get something for nothing, and you can't get as much as you thought you could. Every time I see analyses of politically motivated stuff - like ethanol to water down gasoline, I wonder and try to figure out how much of the inconvenient facts have gone missing in the analysis.
And what the loonies never are able to see is that dense, portable, and storable energy is what has enabled the human race to move from cave man status to our modern world of long life spans, comfort, and convenience. We can always find ways to use energy more efficiently; but any wholesale move toward using LESS energy must entail a regression in standard of living. Just like thermodynamics, it is an ironclad law. Energy replaces work. Reduce energy and everything goes to pot in very fast order. And at the present time, fossil fuels are the most portable, most storable energy sources with the greatest density of joules per unit mass (short of putting a compact nuclear reactor in your home or car that is)![]()
I remember reading once that power transmission lines in Russia were in the 1 million volt range because they had to travel long distances. When you get into those voltages, things become more complex, and even power line insulators just become big resistors.We got complacent because of events. We got pretty good about energy conservation through things like better home insulation and improved efficiency in appliances, heating/cooling systems, and cars/trucks. We also sent a lot of manufacturing offshore. So energy needs didn't really follow population growth, and we didn't build and maintain power grids because we could just slack by. It looks like that's coming home to roost - because the big gains are likely over and common sense says industry has to come back home. Throw in plans to move to EVs, and it's unworkable. We are way behind the curve now.
The other thing about electric power transmission is that routinely wheeling and dealing power nationwide over long lines really doesn't make much sense. Yeah, I doubt that power produced in TN really travels to CA, but just moving from one region to the next and bumping it along seems pretty inefficient. It just makes sense that electric power generation should be a regional thing - and pretty regional at that.
I remember reading once that power transmission lines in Russia were in the 1 million volt range because they had to travel long distances. When you get into those voltages, things become more complex, and even power line insulators just become big resistors.
LOL These leftists don't give a **** about the science of ANYTHING. It. is. all. about. control.You probably only have to use 3 cu ft of NG to produce the electric power necessary to replace 1 cu ft used to heat or cook food. These people need to study thermodynamics and learn something about energy transition from one form to another before they start telling people what to do.
We had a pretty workable scheme for producing energy and holding costs down when we used coal, nuclear, and hydro to produce electricity. After the use of coal went away in homes, none of those competed with residential use - coal may have competed in industrial applications for a while - particularly steel production. NG use in homes as a competitor for residential energy helped keep electric and NG rates down. Now that we use NG (and are dumping coal) to produce electricity, that completely changes the equation, and both NG and electric rates will rise as a result.
They'll have to take my gas WH over my dead body, and I do have guns. Of course, those only last so long; so if they ban new ones, we are screwed. Voters need to start paying attention because it's obvious the electorate is out to lunch right now.
Trying to sneak in a ban and got called to the mat.... now it's "nobody is coming for your gas stove"... these new green dealers banned gas mowers in cali starting next year. ngd calls them "small off road engines" or SOREs.
I don't think Reagan had any control over what the CIA was doing or had very little control over what was going on overseas. I doubt seriously he was given accurate info or control over these affairs.No doubt that Carter left things a mess. But Reagan didnt have to spend billions to Prop up the Contras and the goat ******* in Afghanistan. He let the CIA and the Saudis lead him around by the nose.
I don't think Reagan had any control over what the CIA was doing or had very little control over what was going on overseas. I doubt seriously he was given accurate info or control over these affairs.
I can't think of one war in since 1812 that was both unavoidable and existential to the country's survival. The Civil War was existential, but avoidable. The war with Mexico was not existential to the Republic, but did protect the lives of "American" settlers in Texas. Everything else after the Civil War was completely unnecessary. We should have been neutral in both World Wars or at best, played mediators in resolving issues. WWII doesn't happen without the Treaty of Versailles after WWI. The issues we have in the Middle East today is a result of the Sykes-Picot Agreement in WWI. Japan would have likely been a samurai backwater in 1900 had it not been for Commodore Perry.We weren't in danger of invasion in any wars we fought last century, for example. Should we have fought any of them?