Agency to Consider Federal BAN of Gas Stoves Over Health Hazards

The Demokrats and their bureaucrat lapdogs have already told you what kind of light bulbs you have to use, how much water you can use in a toilet flush, how much water your shower head can use, what you can say on social media about vaccines, and are now working towards forcing you into an electric car. This is just the logical next step.
If you voted for a single Dem in the last decade, congratulations, you got what you asked for; permanent self righteous busybodies who are CERTAIN they know more than you do. Welcome to the inescapable HOA from H3LL
I never understood the logic behind limiting shower heads and toilets, watering your grass and washing your car I get, but showers and toilets are circular, the water that comes out of the head goes back into drain, so back into the "water" system. Yes it needs to be "cleaned" but it's still available
 
I never understood the logic behind limiting shower heads and toilets, watering your grass and washing your car I get, but showers and toilets are circular, the water that comes out of the head goes back into drain, so back into the "water" system. Yes it needs to be "cleaned" but it's still available
a826af1f-c4bc-46f0-82d7-f6babfa260b6_text.gif
 
Just for technical clarification, no President can directly increase the Federal debt as all spending is the function of Congress. Of course, Presidents propose the budget, but Congress is the only body who can actually make it happen.
@Clearwater is smart enough to know that the Reagan numbers were controlled directly by the Congress. He's just trying to gaslight the ignorant folks amongst us.
 
@Clearwater is smart enough to know that the Reagan numbers were controlled directly by the Congress. He's just trying to gaslight the ignorant folks amongst us.

Using percentage increases is dumb as shot as well.

From $1 to $10 debt is nothing. But $100B to $1T is the same equivalency.
 
Sure it has. Democrat presidents have typically been less harmful to the National debt numbers than their Republican counterparts.

That’s false when you consider the reason that the Republicans have had to spend. Obama neglected the military therefore Trump had to spend more to catch up. Reagan had to invest massive dollars in defense as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
But 100 years ago, childhoods asthma didn't exist when we were burning wood and coal?
As pointed out by others you didnt spend as much time indoors around those conditions as they do now.

As always it's a little of column a and a little of column b.

Also modern houses are much more airtight than they were previously. The house you grew up in probably didnt have ANY insulation, single pane windows, joints werent too tight, attic may not have even been really treated. So there was a lot more ability for the bad stuff to leak out and the fresh air to leak in.

With fewer air changes in the house any pollutant is going to stick around longer and become more of a irritant than it otherwise would. And with it being a pollutant created inside the house whatever air system you have isnt going to do anything about it.

And yes kids are spending all day in those conditions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wireless1
That’s false when you consider the reason that the Republicans have had to spend. Obama neglected the military therefore Trump had to spend more to catch up. Reagan had to invest massive dollars in defense as well.

No, he didn't. Obama's military budget was by far the largest in history and we should be cutting military spending. Not increasing it.
 
That’s false when you consider the reason that the Republicans have had to spend. Obama neglected the military therefore Trump had to spend more to catch up. Reagan had to invest massive dollars in defense as well.

No doubt that Carter left things a mess. But Reagan didnt have to spend billions to Prop up the Contras and the goat ******* in Afghanistan. He let the CIA and the Saudis lead him around by the nose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
No, he didn't. Obama's military budget was by far the largest in history and we should be cutting military spending. Not increasing it.

Then either it wasn’t enough or the Commander in Chief had no clue how to manage the dollars allocated. The military needed to be fixed after his 2 terms.

No. We don’t need to be cutting military spending with Russia invading their neighbors, China threatening to annex and grab territory, the southern border being unmanaged and overrun, and tyrant dictators in China, Russia, and NK pointing their weapons at us. And I assume there are many still chanting “death to America” in the streets of ME countries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and AM64
Why did they have to shut down? Were they invading the US? How did the fall of the USSR change the life of the Average American?

We were about to point the space weapons at them.

You’d have to ask their submarine commanders cruising just off of our coastlines.

Didn’t lose as much sleep worrying about getting nuked.
 
Last edited:
Then either it wasn’t enough or the Commander in Chief had no clue how to manage the dollars allocated. The military needed to be fixed after his 2 terms.

No. We don’t need to be cutting military spending with Russia invading their neighbors, China threatening to annex and grab territory, the southern border being unmanaged and overrun, and tyrant dictators in China, Russia, and NK pointing their weapons at us. And I assume there are many still chanting “death to America” in the streets of ME countries.
We probably could cut our military budget and most federal budgets without affecting the end service. The issue is making sure the money gets to where its needed first. Drop all the extra bs. Right now we spend on all the bs first, and if there is left over we maybe send some towards the stated goals.
 
We probably could cut our military budget and most federal budgets without affecting the end service. The issue is making sure the money gets to where its needed first. Drop all the extra bs. Right now we spend on all the bs first, and if there is left over we maybe send some towards the stated goals.

The federal government can always find efficiencies. But protecting freedom is priceless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Now New York Gov. Kathy Hochul plans to BAN Gas Stoves in new homes and commercial buildings by the end of the decade - to the fury of residents

New York state may see a ban on gas stoves in new buildings and homes by the end of the decade, as officials seek to combat climate change.

Governor Kathy Hochul suggested the move during her state-of-the-state address on Tuesday, while outlining her plan toward 'Achieving the New York Dream.'

'Buildings are the largest source of emissions in our state, accounting for a third of our greenhouse gas output,' Hochul said.

If passed, New Yorkers may see only electric stove tops in new developments by 2030.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul will 'BAN new gas stoves' in the state | Daily Mail Online
 

VN Store



Back
Top