Coastypop
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
- Messages
- 22,541
- Likes
- 8,337
I'm a guest on your board, and you guys have been great, so please don't take offense to this but..........
We are 49-7 in the last 4 years. If it was that easy, why doesn't every one just follow the blueprint Auburn set(same one Stanford used) and beat the Ducks? Just sayin.............:good!:
I'm a guest on your board, and you guys have been great, so please don't take offense to this but..........
We are 49-7 in the last 4 years. If it was that easy, why doesn't every one just follow the blueprint Auburn set(same one Stanford used) and beat the Ducks? Just sayin.............:good!:
I'm a guest on your board, and you guys have been great, so please don't take offense to this but..........
We are 49-7 in the last 4 years. If it was that easy, why doesn't every one just follow the blueprint Auburn set(same one Stanford used) and beat the Ducks? Just sayin.............:good!:
Of course it's easier said than done.
However, we have more talent than most of the teams you've played and our coaching staff has done an excellent job with discipline and execution.
Don't expect to see the 2010 version of Tennessee out there, it was our worst roster and coach in the modern era of Tennessee football.
If some of us are pessimistic, it is for this reason: Oregon has a high-powered offense, and we don't. And our defense, while perhaps respectable, clearly isn't great. Add it up and it's hard to see how we are going to score more points than the quackers, playing at home.
If some of us are pessimistic, it is for this reason: Oregon has a high-powered offense, and we don't. And our defense, while perhaps respectable, clearly isn't great. Add it up and it's hard to see how we are going to score more points than the quackers, playing at home.