mtsuraider06
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2013
- Messages
- 1,394
- Likes
- 3,654
When you haven't been in the national title picture in a decade, and fold in the sweet 16 every year, you tend not to get the recruits you used to get. Was that a factor with this prospect? I don't know--but that generally has become an issue for us. We would have never lost recruits to kentucky, south carolina or louisville or others in the past (three programs that have never won squat), but then this is the present--boom.
I don't have the answer. And the discussion today, I thought, was regarding this one particular player.
Recruiting techniques, playing time, better fit for her?
"They have a great academic program," Akhator said. "The players will be graduating with me and I feel that's the right place God wants me to be."
Akhator's choice of Kentucky was also due to the school's nursing program, which she is looking forward to taking part in.
But its becoming a pattern that's why I brought up the previous yrs.
I think we need to consider look into our recruiting techniques when it comes to finding more creative ways to sway recruits
which is why I brought up the Butch Jones reference.
She is a rebounding machine I don't how she would not fit our system.
I fear the day we let the cupboard get dry again and have to come in with a baby vol team like we had Post Parker era. That was coming off back to back titles now we are just losing them to anybody.
But its becoming a pattern that's why I brought up the previous yrs.
I think we need to consider look into our recruiting techniques when it comes to finding more creative ways to sway recruits which is why I brought up the Butch Jones reference.
She is a rebounding machine I don't how she would not fit our system.
I fear the day we let the cupboard get dry again and have to come in with a baby vol team like we had Post Parker era. That was coming off back to back titles now we are just losing them to anybody.
Allow me to break up the intensity of this thread for a chuckle at the strength of academic programs at UK piece in that. Carry on
Honestly, if one is looking for a very, very strong academic school, neither UT nor UK is a powerhouse, at least generally speaking. Neither school has that reputation. That said, I'm sure there are certain programs at both schools that are relatively strong compared to others. For example, UT's forensics program is one of the top such programs in the nation; its liberal arts departments, not so much. I don't know much at all about UK other than the fact that it isn't close to being a top-ranked school academically (but then, neither is UT). However, it may very well have a better nursing program than UT; given that that is apparently Akhator's desired field of study, I can certainly see that playing a major role in her decision.
How do you all know for sure that Kentucky said she would start and how do you know that was something she asked from every school?
Darth...and what would you have done differently...specifically...to ensure she would have signed with UT?
Whether it was explicitly stated or merely implied is irrelevant. The school on her list that is thinnest in the post position at this point is UK. Akhator has two years left, not four, so I'm sure she was looking for a program where she would see a significant amount of immediate playing time and where a starting spot was almost assured. Again, the most likely school is UK. Tennessee isn't loaded at the post position for 2015-16, but Akhator still would have been playing behind Russell and Graves and very likely behind Jones and possibly Nared (depending on how Nared is utilized). Neither playing time nor starting position is guaranteed at any school, but for an incoming post player with only two years of eligibility left, both are far more likely in the foreseeable future at UK than at UT. Akhator may have seen much more playing time at UT in 2016-17, but again, that's dependent upon the incoming 2016 recruits, and UT appears to be in decent position with some top prospects from that class.
Akhator would have been a great pick-up for UT and it's unfortunate that she didn't choose UT. However, it isn't as if UT has no post presence; Graves is a seasoned and hungry player (as well as a very, very good one), Jones is tenacious, and I have a feeling Russell is going to prove to be a force to be reckoned with now that she is fully healthy. Akhator would have been a fantastic addition, but she was needed for depth more than anything. This is in no manner a make-it or break-it issue for UT.
Specifically, I wouldn't have emphatically announced the signing class was done with the two guards and stated for the record I would not be looking at JUCO's..... only to do a complete 180 late in the process when no unforeseen roster changes have occurred. That fickle attitude can be the razor thin difference in winning and losing a recruit. It's almost as if the coach doesn't know what the hell she's doing, but we know that can't be the case....
No one here knows what Holly told her and what Mitchell told her. What we do know is which won her over...
That doesn't really answer my question. I've read several posts that claimed she asked to start for Tennessee and they said no. And that she asked to start for Kentucky and they said yes.
Looking at the rosters, it's clear they have more room at Kentucky for the JC transfer to start than Tennessee. But my question is not if she would start for either team but that it seemed that some posters know that she specifically made that a requirement.
With only Russell, Graves and Jones (not really the same position) she would seem to have plenty of playing time available.
I don't know what the problem is but we do seem to be losing out on some recruits to programs that just do not have our history, facility, or fan base. Something just does not seem right. Maybe recruits just do not see us as major players for a national championship. If we lose major recruits in the 2016 class we have issues that need to be fixed. We can't stick our heads in a hole and keep saying it will all be okay. If you look at the 2016 recruiting class many of the major programs have verbals while we have none. Now we can appease ourselves by saying, verbals don't mean anything recruits can change their minds, however, what makes us think they will sign with us? After losing two post to Baylor I think we need to at least wonder where we are headed.
I don't know what the problem is
but we do seem to be losing out on some recruits to programs that just do not have our history,
facility,
or fan base.
Something just does not seem right. Maybe recruits just do not see us as major players for a national championship.
If we lose major recruits in the 2016 class we have issues that need to be fixed.
We can't stick our heads in a hole and keep saying it will all be okay.
If you look at the 2016 recruiting class many of the major programs have verbals while we have none.
Now we can appease ourselves by saying, verbals don't mean anything recruits can change their minds, however, what makes us think they will sign with us?
After losing two post to Baylor I think we need to at least wonder where we are headed.