Alex Jones, a coward

#126
#126
Throwing the big D around for a conspiracy theory? How many times has anyone been sued over a conspiracy theory? Shouldn’t that be considered a opinion?

They are saying, they are suing for 1 million for every person that believed the story. 150 million. I wonder if they’ll have to prove that in court?
 
#130
#130
RockyTop85 said:
Exhibit B: only an idiot would think that admitting that you do not know what you’re talking about is a point in your favor.
Click to expand...

What did AJ say that fits?

The five requisite elements of a defamation lawsuit?
  • A statement of fact. Of course, for defamation to have occurred, somebody must have made the statement that is considered defamatory. ...
  • A published statement. ...
  • The statement caused injury. ...
  • The statement must be false. ...
  • The statement is not privileged. ...
Click to expand...
 
#134
#134
volfanhill said:
It hurts their reputation. Which, by everything I have read tonight, is considered defamation of character.
Click to expand...

I’m not claiming to know much about this case so did he point to any specific individual and claim they were a crisis actor? Or did he say there were crisis actors there?
 
#135
#135
hog88 said:
Just because a guy is an azzhole and completely wrong doesn’t mean he should be subject to a lawsuit.
Click to expand...
But the argument is that he knew he was full of ****. Lied about it. And that is defamation. It's not that he was wrong. It's that he was lying. That's what the prosecution has to prove. That he said what he said knowing it was false
 
#136
#136
volfanhill said:
But the argument is that he knew he was full of ****. Lied about it. And that is defamation. It's not that he was wrong. It's that he was lying. That's what the prosecution has to prove. That he said what he said knowing it was false
Click to expand...

See my post above this one?
 
#139
#139
volfanhill said:
But the argument is that he knew he was full of ****. Lied about it. And that is defamation. It's not that he was wrong. It's that he was lying. That's what the prosecution has to prove. That he said what he said knowing it was false
Click to expand...

Exactly, if he believed it to be true, his intention wasn’t to defAme anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#140
#140
volfanhill said:
But the argument is that he knew he was full of ****. Lied about it. And that is defamation. It's not that he was wrong. It's that he was lying. That's what the prosecution has to prove. That he said what he said knowing it was false
Click to expand...
He refused to participate in the trial so the judge made the decision he was guilty. Then slammed him. I am just reading most of this. Don't know if he called them out specifically but I think claiming it's a hoax and these parents are crisis actors opens up his exposure big time. Then he didn't turnover evidence asked for by the court.
 
#142
#142
volfanhill said:
But the argument is that he knew he was full of ****. Lied about it. And that is defamation. It's not that he was wrong. It's that he was lying. That's what the prosecution has to prove. That he said what he said knowing it was false
Click to expand...

So why isn’t dementia Joe being bombarded with lawsuits?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#143
#143
hog88 said:
What did AJ say that fits?
Click to expand...

You clearly made up your mind to the point of declaring other people to be “frauds” without knowing what you’re talking about, convincing you of anything is clearly out of the question.

And I’m not interested in dragging you kicking and screaming to the point where you’re up to speed on the facts.

You’ve already discredited yourself well past the point of diminishing returns.

There’s nothing in this to interest me.
 
#146
#146
RockyTop85 said:
You clearly made up your mind to the point of declaring other people to be “frauds” without knowing what you’re talking about, convincing you of anything is clearly out of the question.

And I’m not interested in dragging you kicking and screaming to the point where you’re up to speed on the facts.

You’ve already discredited yourself well past the point of diminishing returns.

There’s nothing in this to interest me.
Click to expand...

Nice long word salad of “I’ve got nothing”.

Huff is a complete fraud.

You can’t answer simple questions to defend your position and yet you claim I have discredited myself?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#148
#148
hog88 said:
Nice long word salad of “I’ve got nothing”.

Huff is a complete fraud.

You can’t answer simple questions to defend your position and yet you claim I have discredited myself?
Click to expand...

Correct. I’ve got nothing to gain from discussing it with you. I said that in only one sentence.
 
#150
#150
loggervol said:
He ( AJ )also offered a apology and a settlement.
Click to expand...
The performance artist piece. His lawyer is saying he's knowing a lying sack of **** to his audience for ratings. That's not against the law but it certainly isn't helpful in a case that claims you are a lying sack of crap who defamed them. Especially when you basically told the judge to F off with your lack of participation in discovery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top