Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Probably didn't occur to you to think those Jewish folks might have lost family members in the holocaust.

So unless AOC's fence photo op was taken at a parking lot in San Juan...that dog don't hunt.
Those Jewish folks also don't take pictures of their very real grief to use as propaganda.
 
It's not a trash argument. The assumption the right is basing it's argument on is that she could not have had an emotional reaction that strong because she was not actually seeing the kids or their suffering, which is why my example is a counterexample to that BS claim from the right.

We all agree, I hope, that a place alone can trigger an emotional reaction based on what has happened there and you don't need to actually see the suffering or the people who are suffering.
Keep driving that trash.


 
It's sad that the left keeps pushing this Hitler/concentration camp comparison. It's left wing propaganda at it's craziest. Hitler tried to eliminate an entire race of people. He rounded people up from their every day lives and put them in concentration camps with the specific purpose of seeing them dead. If the border camps are so bad, why do migrants continue to choose them over their home countries?
 
So by that reasoning, Jews who today travel to the concentration camps in Poland and break down in emotion as they approach must be faking it since there's no actual suffering that they're seeing.

AOC was put in a concentration camp? I did not know that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joevol33
giphy.gif

That person is not a Democrat because there's no safety net (media) to catch her f*** up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BUBear
Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.

Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.

Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.

Empty parking lots make me cry. Waste of precious real estate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.

Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
At the time, why didn't they post pics from behind of her looking at nothing. Why did it take someone getting their hands on the originals and posting them a year later?

She knew what she was doing and so do you.
 
Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.

Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
That level of grief to a place she hasnt been too before and a place that isnt nearly that level of grief bad? That plus it was staged. That plus it was lied about in order to push an agenda? That plus everyone is falling over themselves to defend her on it. That plus she has already stretched the truth about them comparing them to genocide.

She look like she straight up saw her mom getting butchered, or when she found out Trump won. Oh there are some tents over there with some stuff going on that I dont like doesnt quiet cut it. Also add on the fact that that COULDNT have been her first glimpse of the tents from that distance. It wasnt some spontaneous breakdown.
 
Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.

Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.

There are few things in life worse than a long-winded lawyer.
 
It's not a trash argument. The assumption the right is basing it's argument on is that she could not have had an emotional reaction that strong because she was not actually seeing the kids or their suffering, which is why my example is a counterexample to that BS claim from the right.

We all agree, I hope, that a place alone can trigger an emotional reaction based on what has happened there and you don't need to actually see the suffering or the people who are suffering.
Bless your heart.
 
Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.

Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
I'm convinced that the interior or your cranium is inhabited by a giant pretzel.
 
Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.

Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
Keep grasping. You seem to think you're on to something. You're really not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Where is this quote from? Oh yes, another hen house website with no credibility. Is anyone else reporting this story? Have you ever heard of a "quality citation?"
Because AOC's comments could in no way be politically motivated, right? It's not like she's made it publicly known she detests all things Trump and wants him out of office..... It was a staged photo op. How much credibility does that deserve?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Keep grasping. You seem to think you're on to something. You're really not.

Okay, what's the significance of the parking lot for the red hats if it's not what I just said? All the pictures had been out there for sometime but supposedly when red hats found out it was a parking lot that changed everything.
 
Okay, what's the significance of the parking lot for the red hats if it's not what I just said? All the pictures had been out there for sometime but supposedly when red hats found out it was a parking lot that changed everything.
She purposely set up a photo op creating a false image. It's propaganda. If the right did something similar, you'd be up in arms, and justifiably so. The only reason you continue to defend it is because you share political ideologies. It's sad that you cannot simply admit she was wrong.
 

VN Store



Back
Top