Weezer
VolNation Dalai Lama , VN Most Beloved Poster
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 87,939
- Likes
- 258,873
Keep driving that trash.It's not a trash argument. The assumption the right is basing it's argument on is that she could not have had an emotional reaction that strong because she was not actually seeing the kids or their suffering, which is why my example is a counterexample to that BS claim from the right.
We all agree, I hope, that a place alone can trigger an emotional reaction based on what has happened there and you don't need to actually see the suffering or the people who are suffering.
Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.
Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
At the time, why didn't they post pics from behind of her looking at nothing. Why did it take someone getting their hands on the originals and posting them a year later?Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.
Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
That level of grief to a place she hasnt been too before and a place that isnt nearly that level of grief bad? That plus it was staged. That plus it was lied about in order to push an agenda? That plus everyone is falling over themselves to defend her on it. That plus she has already stretched the truth about them comparing them to genocide.Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.
Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.
Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
Bless your heart.It's not a trash argument. The assumption the right is basing it's argument on is that she could not have had an emotional reaction that strong because she was not actually seeing the kids or their suffering, which is why my example is a counterexample to that BS claim from the right.
We all agree, I hope, that a place alone can trigger an emotional reaction based on what has happened there and you don't need to actually see the suffering or the people who are suffering.
I'm convinced that the interior or your cranium is inhabited by a giant pretzel.Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.
Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
Keep grasping. You seem to think you're on to something. You're really not.Wow, you guys really suck at argumentation. Why did AOC take heat for this? Because she was breaking down in front of a parking lot that led up to a tent ciy detention facility. That was the alleged conclusive "evidence" for this being a bunch of BS. What's the hidden (major) premise that would support the idea that she couldn't possibly be showing emotion in front of a parking lot? Something along the lines of "if you're not in the actual presence of suffering or the people that underwent the suffering, then the emotion must be staged." How do you show that's not a true? Present a counterexample, namely one where a person is experiencing a real, genuine emotional reaction even though they're not seeing anyone who actually suffered or the suffering itself. Hence, the example of a person breaking down on the way to visit a historical concentration camp that is now a museum. The person is not in the presence of the suffering that went on there or the people that suffered there, yet the emotion is very real.
Really guys, this is not hard stuff. But this does make it clear how you routinely fall for the howlers put out by right wing media.
Because AOC's comments could in no way be politically motivated, right? It's not like she's made it publicly known she detests all things Trump and wants him out of office..... It was a staged photo op. How much credibility does that deserve?Where is this quote from? Oh yes, another hen house website with no credibility. Is anyone else reporting this story? Have you ever heard of a "quality citation?"
Keep grasping. You seem to think you're on to something. You're really not.
She purposely set up a photo op creating a false image. It's propaganda. If the right did something similar, you'd be up in arms, and justifiably so. The only reason you continue to defend it is because you share political ideologies. It's sad that you cannot simply admit she was wrong.Okay, what's the significance of the parking lot for the red hats if it's not what I just said? All the pictures had been out there for sometime but supposedly when red hats found out it was a parking lot that changed everything.