CagleMtnVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2008
- Messages
- 27,582
- Likes
- 43,770
She seems marginally smarter than AOC. Better looking, too. She’s about as left wing loony as AOC, which probably won’t go over all that well in GA.Supposed to be the next AOC. With this last name, heads on the FoxNews crowd would literally explode if she won in Georgia.
https://www.nabilahforcongress.com/home
So she cost her district over 20k jobs and billions in revenue and wants to be thanked for it...the comments help restore my faith that most ppl understand economics and reject the corporations are evil talking points
Yeah but they could have just taken that money from the tax incentives they were offering Amazon and just given it to the local people... right?Do you believe she got a better deal for NYC than what they offered Amazon first and what having Amazons Headquarters in the city would have brought in ? She’s telling us year 1 was 700 , what was the estimated jobs after they got the building up ? She’s cheery picking and gloating over 1500 jobs from the largest company in the country . She can spin it anyway she wants ... losing an estimated 23k for 1500 is just stupid .
Do you believe she got a better deal for NYC than what they offered Amazon first and what having Amazons Headquarters in the city would have brought in ? She’s telling us year 1 was 700 , what was the estimated jobs after they got the building up ? She’s cheery picking and gloating over 1500 jobs from the largest company in the country . She can spin it anyway she wants ... losing an estimated 23k for 1500 is just stupid .
It’s never about the money, it’s about the mascot on the cheerleading uniform.I think they’ll be okay. I find it ironic how the right is anti-government, but when it comes to using people’s tax dollars to subsidize multi-billion dollar corporations (that can certainly afford it themselves) they’re all for it.
I think they’ll be okay. I find it ironic how the right is anti-government, but when it comes to using people’s tax dollars to subsidize multi-billion dollar corporations (that can certainly afford it themselves) they’re all for it.
From what I understand, Amazon was going to receive close to 3 billion in incentives. 1.2 of that looks like it was going to be in tax relief, which is fine. The other 1.8 was going to come out of taxpayer’s wallets, which is not fine. This is central planning at its base and an example of privatized profits and socialized expenses. I don’t care how many jobs it creates (I’m not a utilitarian), stealing more money from taxpayers to create “jobs” is morally wrong. So good on AOC if this is the case, although the truth is that Amazon probably didn’t offer sufficient bribes or didn’t bribe the right people.I didn’t ask if they will be ok , The question was do you think by giving up 23k jobs for 1500 she got NYC the better deal ?
explain the 1.8 you are talking about. How does it come directly from taxpayer's wallets?From what I understand
From what I understand, Amazon was going to receive close to 3 billion in incentives. 1.2 of that looks like it was going to be in tax relief, which is fine. The other 1.8 was going to come out of taxpayer’s wallets, which is not fine. This is central planning at its base and an example of privatized profits and socialized expenses. I don’t care how many jobs it creates (I’m not a utilitarian), stealing more money from taxpayers to create “jobs” is morally wrong. So good on AOC if this is the case, although the truth is that Amazon probably didn’t offer sufficient bribes or didn’t bribe the right people.
explain the 1.8 you are talking about. How does it come directly from taxpayer's wallets?
I don’t care. That’s also Amazon’s rosy projection. Stealing from me the taxpayer to pay a company to hire another taxpayer so they can pay taxes is the definition of cronyism. It’s also the govt picking winners and losers. And this could happen.That’s a one year payback!!