Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

I have made no claim whatsoever! You are the one with claims seemingly composed of absolutely nothing but your opinion. In fact, I said "I confess I know little about her except from reading the link" followed by pointing out that you have made claims without one single shred of evidence as to their veracity.. And is the "maga" supposed to be a pejorative? You do realize what that acronym is, right?

You made claims about the link that was posted. I simply pointed out that logically, one cannot reach the conclusions you seem to make based on the posted link. You are apparently drawing conclusions out of mid-air, or where the sun doesn't shine, and then complain someone else has not done their research. I even offered you an opportunity by saying perhaps you have information to which the rest of us are not privy.

This is really easy to get out of: just say, "I'm a partisan dumbass and have formed my opinion that MTG, regardless of any evidence to the contrary, is a worthless piece of human garbage and has no redeeming qualities." It is much more brief and gets to the point much quicker than the inane arguments (I'm being charitable!) made to this point.
You read a release she wrote and based your opinion on that. Then you call me a partisan dumbass for actually knowing more about it than you. My conclusions are based on readily available facts if you're interested. Personally I like to read up a bit on subjects before jumping in and insulting people.

You'll also notice I asked for facts to back up someone claim and got nothing but a propaganda piece. Maybe you should call them out as well? Nah, easier to ignore and try to score cheap points with me.
 
You say that like it's objective statements....absolutes.
Which part?
Are you saying she didn't come out of that looking far worse than the others?
Are you saying that she isn't a representative of trumpism?

Because if so, any objective observer would certainly disagree with you.

Which would lead one to the conclusion that you may be the one actually lacking objectivity.
 
Which part?
Are you saying she didn't come out of that looking far worse than the others?
Are you saying that she isn't a representative of trumpism?

Because if so, any objective observer would certainly disagree with you.

Which would lead one to the conclusion that you may be the one actually lacking objectivity.

Yeah she came out looking worse if you think Crockett's gay joke landed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Whatever.
Ma, ma, where's my pa?
Gone to the White House, ha, ha, ha.

Seriously, this cat fight was a hoot, despite lacking proper decorum for so-called elected officials.
However, the blonde dumbshell started it.
Naw, doesn't matter who started it, Congress is becoming closer and closer like the nits in the British Parliament, Turkish Parliament, and elsewhere.
People are just too stupid to be civil, exhibit common sense, or exhibit common decency.
 
You read a release she wrote and based your opinion on that. Then you call me a partisan dumbass for actually knowing more about it than you. My conclusions are based on readily available facts if you're interested. Personally I like to read up a bit on subjects before jumping in and insulting people.

You'll also notice I asked for facts to back up someone claim and got nothing but a propaganda piece. Maybe you should call them out as well? Nah, easier to ignore and try to score cheap points with me.
Look, you might want to re-read my posts, because you're obviously not getting the fact I clearly stated do not care for her. However, YOU made claims that contradicted information in the link to her, what I believe is, HOR page. YOU made the claims, therefore it seems incumbent upon you to provide information proving your point. Or just say, "I have information that contradicts what is in that link and that is what I believe." Simple. I don't care. I'm just having fun pointing out that logically, nothing you've said about her has any basis in provided facts, just opinions. And you're welcome to them! I do not really care what you think about her.

I do care about being fair in one's treatment. I've been guilty of not being fair and am really trying hard to be different. And being unfair probably includes suggesting you were a partisan dumbass openly, so mea culpa. Let everyone draw their own conclusions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbh
Ma, ma, where's my pa?
Gone to the White House, ha, ha, ha.

Seriously, this cat fight was a hoot, despite lacking proper decorum for so-called elected officials.
However, the blonde dumbshell started it.
Naw, doesn't matter who started it, Congress is becoming closer and closer like the nits in the British Parliament, Turkish Parliament, and elsewhere.
People are just too stupid to be civil, exhibit common sense, or exhibit common decency.
Can't leave out the Taiwan parliament.
 
Ignorant about what? That you have said that you believe men can give birth to babies? Oh, no. You said it and whenever you get completely in the ditch with your trolling, I'm here to remind you of it.
Precisely - you are ignorant about that! (As well as a multitude of other things)
If memory serves me correctly, I said it's not beyond the abilities of science to one day make that happen.
I'll gladly stand by that position.
Either you can not read with comprehension, your memory sucks, your biases cloud your judgement, you are simply a liar, or some combination of those.

If you think you can prove that wrong, go for it!!!!

If not, keep showing your big a$$ as you selectively dodge the actual debate being had.

Current odds on Grover backing up his false accusation - 1 to 83.

Anxiously awaiting.
 
Last edited:
Ma, ma, where's my pa?
Gone to the White House, ha, ha, ha.

Seriously, this cat fight was a hoot, despite lacking proper decorum for so-called elected officials.
However, the blonde dumbshell started it.
Naw, doesn't matter who started it, Congress is becoming closer and closer like the nits in the British Parliament, Turkish Parliament, and elsewhere.
People are just too stupid to be civil, exhibit common sense, or exhibit common decency.

Combine that with Crockett's gay jokes and profanity on the house floor it's pitiful who is getting elected. I know your on the left but I know you don't support that.
 
Ma, ma, where's my pa?
Gone to the White House, ha, ha, ha.

Seriously, this cat fight was a hoot, despite lacking proper decorum for so-called elected officials.
However, the blonde dumbshell started it.
Naw, doesn't matter who started it, Congress is becoming closer and closer like the nits in the British Parliament, Turkish Parliament, and elsewhere.
People are just too stupid to be civil, exhibit common sense, or exhibit common decency.
we are just reverting back to the FF's Congress. The good ole days of duels, and beating each other with canes. let them fight, we will at least find out who is serious about their beliefs. The lobbyists are really going to have up their dental benefits when they start going a couple rounds over the next slice of pork.
 
we are just reverting back to the FF's Congress. The good ole days of duels, and beating each other with canes. let them fight, we will at least find out who is serious about their beliefs. The lobbyists are really going to have up their dental benefits when they start going a couple rounds over the next slice of pork.
With the idiots we now have in Congress, I say if thuggism is the rule of law, elect Crips, Bloods, American Front, Aryan Nations etc. What's the difference anyway?
 
Precisely - you are ignorant about that! (As well as a multitude of other things)
If memory serves me correctly, I said it's not beyond the abilities of science to one day make that happen.
I'll gladly stand by that position.
Either you can not read with comprehension, your memory sucks, your biases cloud your judgement, you are simply a liar, or some combination of those.

If you think you can prove that wrong, go for it!!!!

If not, keep showing your big a$$ as you selectively dodge the actual debate being had.

Current odds on Grover backing up his false accusation - 1 to 83.

Anxiously awaiting.
You go ahead and stand by that position. You argued this same thing last year or so and I dragged up the post you made. Not looking for it again. It boils down to you believe that men can have babies. I don't care whether it is through some massive technological effort or not, the bottom line is:

You believe in the proposition that men can have babies. Tomorrow or 100 years from now through technology.

I'd be more willing to bet on technological advances for the proverbial test tube vs. achieving it by going Dr. Moreau on human males.
 
we are just reverting back to the FF's Congress. The good ole days of duels, and beating each other with canes. let them fight, we will at least find out who is serious about their beliefs. The lobbyists are really going to have up their dental benefits when they start going a couple rounds over the next slice of pork.
I could get behind allowing duels again.
 
You go ahead and stand by that position. You argued this same thing last year or so and I dragged up the post you made. Not looking for it again. It boils down to you believe that men can have babies. I don't care whether it is through some massive technological effort or not, the bottom line is:

You believe in the proposition that men can have babies. Tomorrow or 100 years from now through technology.

I'd be more willing to bet on technological advances for the proverbial test tube vs. achieving it by going Dr. Moreau on human males.
Sure, I'll stand by that position - since it is correct and the one I have held the entire time.

And we did argue this a year ago because you made the same false and pointless accusation then. (for absolutely no reason)

But just so everyone can see how petty you are................Here is your post with the senseless question
By the way, since you labeled my entire post as stupid, you believe men can give birth?
Here is my answer to your senseless question
I imagine technology isn't to far away from making that a possibility.

And your comment "I'd be more willing to bet on technological advances for the proverbial test tube vs. achieving it by going Dr. Moreau on human males.".......WTH??

That has nothing to do with anything. I'd be more willing to bet on that also.
I don't know what nerve of yours I hit a couple of years ago, but it's time to let it go.....it's a bad look for you.
 
Sure, I'll stand by that position - since it is correct and the one I have held the entire time.

And we did argue this a year ago because you made the same false and pointless accusation then. (for absolutely no reason)

But just so everyone can see how petty you are................Here is your post with the senseless question

Here is my answer to your senseless question


And your comment "I'd be more willing to bet on technological advances for the proverbial test tube vs. achieving it by going Dr. Moreau on human males.".......WTH??

That has nothing to do with anything. I'd be more willing to bet on that also.
I don't know what nerve of yours I hit a couple of years ago, but it's time to let it go.....it's a bad look for you.
I read this forum a lot and rarely post. In any forum for that matter. But you and your continuums and everything you vocalize are about the dumbest things money could pay for. Glad you live in Georgia with your complete lack of a functional brain.
 
I read this forum a lot and rarely post. In any forum for that matter. But you and your continuums and everything you vocalize are about the dumbest things money could pay for. Glad you live in Georgia with your complete lack of a functional brain.
He's just a troll. I refuse to believe he can actually be as stupid and as much of an America hating as he portrays himself.
 

VN Store



Back
Top