hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 117,175
- Likes
- 170,127
No, I'm not saying it rises and falls. What I am saying is that just because climate patterns are altered doesn't mean it is always hotter. Many will get hotter, some may get colder, extreme weather will increase regardless. Global temperatures have hit records like 16 of the past 17 years.
Now if you are referring to certain events like the Earth has gone through both Ice Ages and times of extreme heat but they didn't occur anywhere near as rapid (barring asteroid collisions etc).
How do you define rich?Umm, yes if you are rich than you should absolutely pay more. And I don't know where you got that I only wanted them to pay for it. I explicitly said that nearly everyone should pay for it, including myself.
My degree is a dual concentration MPH Healthcare Management and Epidemiology
Want to guess which country doesn't have Nationalized Healthcare and which country also pays the most in administrative costs. Take a wild guess!
1. No one has ever stopped striving because of a higher tax bracket.We are on polar opposites of the spectrum with each of the topics you just commented on.
1. You cannot punish success and expect people to continue to strive for it. Why should you be punished through higher taxes simply because you put the work in, sacrificed and earned the money you will be making?
2. Nationalizing our heathcare will decrease quality and like in other countries will lead to 2 separate systems. One for those who can afford to pay and the other for those who can't. Care to guess where the best and brightest medical professionals will go?
3. Free college for all would cut the value of the degrees you just worked your azz off for by 1/2 or more. You would be devaluing a college degree to that of a current HS diploma.
4. Tech skills need to be taught in HS. No kid leaving HS should be unemployable the day after graduation.
Umm, yes if you are rich than you should absolutely pay more. And I don't know where you got that I only wanted them to pay for it. I explicitly said that nearly everyone should pay for it, including myself.
My degree is a dual concentration MPH Healthcare Management and Epidemiology
Want to guess which country doesn't have Nationalized Healthcare and which country also pays the most in administrative costs. Take a wild guess!
You don't fix a broken healthcare system by saying it's completely free. No reason a bandaid should be $10 at a hospital. It needs reformed and reformed 30 years ago but to fix it doesn't mean free.1. No one has ever stopped striving because of a higher tax bracket.
2. Health care is currently beyond broken. We pay far more per/capita than any country in the world and are about 28th in results. We are the most grossly overmedicated country in the world. We waste hundreds of billions annually on over priced and unneeded procedures and screenings. Nationalized health care is long overdue and inevitable.
3. Free high school for all devalued the high school diploma. Hell, free kindergarten for all devalued the kindergarten education. A more intelligent society is a better society. Look no further than the 2016 results.
4. Completely agree.
Hog,
Let's get down to basic economics. Is wealth scarce?
If so, how much of the pie should one person be allowed to take? We have a system where soon a handful of people will own the same as half the population.
I'm not asking for everyone to have the same or for work ethic to not matter. No one needs past a certain amount, now yes that differs by area and by state and we can debate a 100% income cap, but the Rich used to pay a lot more in this country and wealth inequality used to be a lot less of a problem.
If you answer no other of my questions... What percent of the wealth should the top 1% have? 80% 90% 99% Seriously I want to hear your opinion.
You are offensive. LeBron needs to gimme some of that money, And Brady needs to start sharing Gisselle.Hog,
Let's get down to basic economics. Is wealth scarce?
If so, how much of the pie should one person be allowed to take? We have a system where soon a handful of people will own the same as half the population.
I'm not asking for everyone to have the same or for work ethic to not matter. No one needs past a certain amount, now yes that differs by area and by state and we can debate a 100% income cap, but the Rich used to pay a lot more in this country and wealth inequality used to be a lot less of a problem.
If you answer no other of my questions... What percent of the wealth should the top 1% have? 80% 90% 99% Seriously I want to hear your opinion.
1. No one has ever stopped striving because of a higher tax bracket.
2. Health care is currently beyond broken. We pay far more per/capita than any country in the world and are about 28th in results. We are the most grossly overmedicated country in the world. We waste hundreds of billions annually on over priced and unneeded procedures and screenings. Nationalized health care is long overdue and inevitable.
3. Free high school for all devalued the high school diploma. Hell, free kindergarten for all devalued the kindergarten education. A more intelligent society is a better society. Look no further than the 2016 results.
4. Completely agree.
Well xi did say xi was in 'management'. Another word for bureaucrat.And it's free. Right up his alley.
It stills says they polled 966 people. There's 300+M in America. Go ask Bob in Kansas what he thinks of her deal. Be ready to be told to F off.
1. No one has ever stopped striving because of a higher tax bracket.
2. Health care is currently beyond broken. We pay far more per/capita than any country in the world and are about 28th in results. We are the most grossly overmedicated country in the world. We waste hundreds of billions annually on over priced and unneeded procedures and screenings. Nationalized health care is long overdue and inevitable.
3. Free high school for all devalued the high school diploma. Hell, free kindergarten for all devalued the kindergarten education. A more intelligent society is a better society. Look no further than the 2016 results.
4. Completely agree.
At his Hollywood height, actor Ronnie Reagan was making $400,000 per picture. With the top federal tax rate over 90 percent, Reagan used to tell his White House chief of staff Donald Regan, he always chose to “loaf” around rather than make more than two pictures a year.
“Why should I have done a third picture, even if it was Gone with the Wind?” Regan remembers Reagan asking. “What good would it have done me?”
Not sure why those pesky Canadians are coming here for healthcare.