C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 29,767
- Likes
- 52,477
The movie where people reject science and end up practically destroying all life? Yep, that sounds like my generation all right.
The cognitive dissonance is admirable. If ignorance is bliss, you must be on cloud 9.
Hog,
Let's get down to basic economics. Is wealth scarce?
If so, how much of the pie should one person be allowed to take? We have a system where soon a handful of people will own the same as half the population.
I'm not asking for everyone to have the same or for work ethic to not matter. No one needs past a certain amount, now yes that differs by area and by state and we can debate a 100% income cap, but the Rich used to pay a lot more in this country and wealth inequality used to be a lot less of a problem.
If you answer no other of my questions... What percent of the wealth should the top 1% have? 80% 90% 99% Seriously I want to hear your opinion.
You have a thankless job for the most part. I know what that can feel like when people criticize your profession. Particularly when you put so much of yourself into it trying to benefit others. Most of us are just rattling cages but behind every joke there is some truth, . . . I guess.Whoa now...
Spoken like someone who has actually been in the gottdamned trenches and has significant amounts of anecdotal and research based evidence to show your comments are based on outlier issues and magnified for ideological effect.
It's a very liberal mindset, yours; someone doesn't agree with you, go for the cheap shot.
Let's face it. AOC is high-end comedy until you realize this stupid woman has her hands on the wheel. It is like watching an SNL skit...except it is real and she means every bit of it. She just looks into the camera and says the most jaw-dropping ignorant things imaginable with most conviction and confidence. In the back of my mind, I keep waiting on the laugh track and a cut to commercial but it doesn't come. Ronald Reagan's old quote about liberals not being ignorant just knowing so much that is not true... is not applicable to her. She is ignorant and knows so much that is not true.
If we're going to give free college for every single person why does anybody need give more than their 35 to 45%?I don't think we should have Billionaires nope. If you can't find value worth living and innovating when you are already beyond what most can comprehend than too bad, so sad. Let me find the world's smallest violin...
I think ideally limits would be enacted by states because of differences amongst CoL. Because we are speaking on a federal level, I would be inclined to take the most expensive living area (say San Fran). Average home is around 1 million multiply that by say 100.
100 million would be a fair cap in my opinion. Probably less if I could personally legislate, but I feel inclined to negotiate (for now) with idiots using the bs exaggerated incentive argument, who are nonetheless citizens and entitled to a democratic vote.
Here is an idea. Move to a socialist country that aligns with you beliefs. And take a few friends with you. Russia is nice this time of year.I think ideally limits would be enacted by states because of differences amongst CoL. Because we are speaking on a federal level, I would be inclined to take the most expensive living area (say San Fran). Average home is around 1 million multiply that by say 100.
100 million would be a fair cap in my opinion. Probably less if I could personally legislate, but I feel inclined to negotiate (for now) with idiots using the bs exaggerated incentive argument, who are nonetheless citizens and entitled to a democratic vote.
Nope. Nobody from Yale was calling Bob from Kansas dude. Those polls are manufactured. They have to stay in their demographics so that the poll will show what they want.
Remember all those polls saying Hillary was going to win in a blue wave landslide in 2016? Wait,
was you still in highschool?
Thank you for this post. I needed a solid laugh today.I have to say as a economically left winger (social moderate), I was worried at first that AOC would be too focused on identity issues.
I'm fully behind her now though, one month ago, I'd have said she could never be a mainstream contender. Now, I have seen many of my Republican friends get behind her even (granted I'm at a college campus so the Republicans aren't the Insane Climate denying/Slavery light people).
I think I like many others though that the right wing media would attack her relentlessly and define her essentially. She has not only fought back but also showed the hypocrisy of so many in the conservative establishment. I'm sick and tired of apologetic, moderate DINOs. AOC is definitely part of the Democratic future.
OMFG this new campus liberal warrior is simply precious. So what’s your field of study zaqhhh? Im gonna guess not engineering, comp sci, or any STEM programs. Probably not even a business degree. So sociology? Psychology? English Lit?
I think ideally limits would be enacted by states because of differences amongst CoL. Because we are speaking on a federal level, I would be inclined to take the most expensive living area (say San Fran). Average home is around 1 million multiply that by say 100.
100 million would be a fair cap in my opinion. Probably less if I could personally legislate, but I feel inclined to negotiate (for now) with idiots using the bs exaggerated incentive argument, who are nonetheless citizens and entitled to a democratic vote.
You are a washing machine stuck on spin cycle.God, I am so sick of this argument. First off, just as a point of reference Hillary sucks imo. She is a moderate that could just as easily be a Republican.
Second, the polls predicted that Hillary would win by 2-3 points in the popular vote. Based on those national numbers, there was around a 66% shot for her to win.
What actually happened is she won by 2-3 points and lost which is still quite within the 33% chance she had based on polling to lose. The polls, at least most of them weren't wrong. You got upset because they told you your candidate would lose and then yelled "LOL" instead of actually looking to the science of the polls. Science, as we have established throughout, is a foreign and hostile concept to you.
OMFG this new campus liberal warrior is simply precious. So what’s your field of study zaqhhh? Im gonna guess not engineering, comp sci, or any STEM programs. Probably not even a business degree. So sociology? Psychology? English Lit?
God, I am so sick of this argument. First off, just as a point of reference Hillary sucks imo. She is a moderate that could just as easily be a Republican.
Second, the polls predicted that Hillary would win by 2-3 points in the popular vote. Based on those national numbers, there was around a 66% shot for her to win.
What actually happened is she won by 2-3 points and lost which is still quite within the 33% chance she had based on polling to lose. The polls, at least most of them weren't wrong. You got upset because they told you your candidate would lose and then yelled "LOL" instead of actually looking to the science of the polls. Science, as we have established throughout, is a foreign and hostile concept to you.
Nuff Said.......
If we're going to give free college for every single person why does anybody need give more than their 35 to 45%?
If they have free college they can get a degree and becoming a Millionaire or Billionaire?