For this one statistically about +/- 75%.Have you taken a statistical methods course? Samples are representative. So Bob in Kansas probably got asked or someone akin to him. If a sample is representative than yes, there may be variations of you add in 100k more people but it is unlikely to be significantly different than 1k similarly polled persons.
When was the last poll you saw with that many people? That's why there are margins of errors.
So here is the income distribution for both individuals and households from the 2014 US Census. Am i correctly interpreting that you would levy steep taxes (over 30% net say) in that top bracket and redistribute that wealth? Or is your break point above that bracket for “steep” taxes?Obviously it is going to depend and I have stated that throughout. As per your specific example, 400k house at 30 yr mortgage we will say along with your other parameters. A family income of 150-200k per year would achieve that.
What always happens is that we go after the very top earners and you all throw in a high middle class earner and say "You are hurting them too." Like I said let's start at the top and work down.
Yes it's subjective, yes there are differences, no there is not a perfect system. But this current system as with any Reaganomics/Libertarian dream is not going to be supported.
She's doing it to herself. Pelosi can't stand her. She makes the most extreme Democrat look sane. As for her huge following on social media it's no different than Taylor swift, it's a bunch of kids that don't know their azz from a hole in the ground like this kid showing up out of nowhere today.The obsession the right wing has with this 29 year old member of the House in her 2nd month in office, is comical and pathetic. She is not a committee chairman and she has very little power. You really should be much more concerned about trying to discredit Reps. Adam Schiff and Elijah Cummings right now... but instead, you're wasting time with "Ariana Grande". The dopes on 'Fox & Friends' were actually critical of her today for not smiling enough during the State of the Union Address. She has the following on social media that she does, largely because of how much the right is talking about her. This has reached the level of overkill. Every single Fox opinion show has discussed her this week.
It's not the left wing who is talking about her constantly.She's doing it to herself. Pelosi can't stand her. She makes the most extreme Democrat look sane. As for her huge following on social media it's no different than Taylor swift, it's a bunch of kids that don't know their azz from a hole in the ground like this kid showing up out of nowhere today.
In my opinion, denouncing her lunatic ideas before she has a chance to spread them to other fools is a great way to spend time. Why do you get to decide for other people if the way they choose to spend their time is worthy?The extent of his attacks on her are well documented. Google it if you want, I don't care what you do. There is no way she is worth the amount of time that the right has already devoted to her.
Yeah, yeah. The proponents of slavery said the same thing and they lost as will you.
I'll be happy living in the post apocalyptic world that you are sure will materialize.
You’re assuming the top 1% got to that point without understanding how to control the other 99% that believe they have free will in their vote or capacity to affect change. Reality can be a real bitch.This is a democracy? If 60% of people tell the other 40% that the top 1% have too much than who are you to stop them?
No more looney than Maxine Waters or Bernie Sanders or even Sheila Jackson Lee... so, what is different about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? She is young, charismatic and in the eyes of some - attractive. This obsession with her comes from resentment... not policy.In my opinion, denouncing her lunatic ideas before she has a chance to spread them to other fools is a great way to spend time. Why do you get to decide for other people if the way they choose to spend their time is worthy?
You have hardly even close to the life experience, not even close. You know nothing about life. You have lived in a nice bubble provided by your parents and academia.Again, It's clear I have more experience than you. But please let's enact all Ayn Rands policy plans and see where we get.
The nice thing about this thread is while a few of you are similar in age, most of you will be dead in 30 years. And then I'll be talking about you like we do Jim Crow.
Your enemy isn't me, it's time. And that is a war you'll never win.
No more looney than Maxine Waters or Bernie Sanders or even Sheila Jackson Lee... so, what is different about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? She is young, charismatic and in the eyes of some - attractive. This obsession with her comes from resentment... not policy.
Ahhh yes of course...No more looney than Maxine Waters or Bernie Sanders or even Sheila Jackson Lee... so, what is different about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? She is young, charismatic and in the eyes of some - attractive. This obsession with her comes from resentment... not policy.
I didn't say she was a victim, did I? She chose this career and from everything I have seen... she loves every minute of it. I'm saying that the right has chosen to focus on her for things which have nothing to do with policy. The right is resentful of who she is.Ahhh yes of course...
she is a victim
another poor oppressed soul in a flawed system
Typical
I didn't say she was a victim, did I? She chose this career and from everything I have seen... she loves every minute of it. I'm saying that the right has chosen to focus on her for things which have nothing to do with policy. The right is resentful of who she is.