Many analysts and even casual observers were expecting us to be South Carolina bad last year, as in we may not get past 10-12 wins. People that followed the program closely probably expected us to finish somewhere around a couple wins above .500. We didn't finish too far off of that prediction, but the quality wins we had in the later half of the schedule were unexpected and turned a "pretty good" record into a "very good" record when you put it in context. We were obviously more talented and had more pieces than even most fans expected.
Of all the coaching hires made during that particular off-season, we were very fortunate. Take Brian Gregory, for example. Most people would agree that he was a more proven coach, having been to the NCAA tourney with Dayton twice. GA Tech finished 11-20 last year, with arguably more "proven" talent entering the season. Cuonzo's defensive-minded approach is the reason we won games last year. We tried to win games by out scoring the opposition, and it didn't work. I don't think you would've seen the success we had last year had we hired a Brian Gregory or a Mike Anderson (speaking of short-term success here). Jamie Dixon, who a lot of people were naming as a UT target, coached his team to the CBI last year. Roy Williams coached his blue-blood '09 team to the NIT. Programs have to rebuild and will have down years. I don't know how you can look at last year's team or the coaching hire, given the results, as a failure.