Firebirdparts
Best tackle for his weight the old school ever had
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2014
- Messages
- 4,522
- Likes
- 8,009
You know, I've lost half my net worth twice, and I would have said the opposite. "Be fearful when others are fearful" is really not the way to do. The time to preserve capital was in January of 2020, and the big problem is if you are too chicken to invest again around April 1. if you invested again April 1, yippee, you've doubled your net worth, and since then, we have two clear signals to work with, if you care to:I might jinx you with this, but having lived through the dot.com bubble and the financial/ housing bubble I think it’s wise to take a capital preservation strategy atm until things shake out. All the retail market sellers and news providers tend to paint an overly optimistic outlook. It’s also human nature to keep chasing big returns when you’ve enjoyed several years of success. Doesn’t take a genius to look around and see there’s a lot of things in this country that are bat **** crazy right now starting with our political leadership. War and an impeding energy crisis in Europe. Inflation (especially food prices) is the highest I can recall and does anyone really believe the prices will fall in the future? Challenging times for investing for sure.
1. Valuations are sky high, so IN THEORY stocks won't run up again real soon (in theory) and
2. The sovereign banks are raising rates because the economy is ON FIRE, and possibly doing QT at the same time, because they really need to.
The time to react to these realities is also in the past. They weren't secret. However, reacting to #1 has proven to be a bad idea some of the time.
I realize this thread is about individual stocks, so I don't want to jabber too much. There are 3 possible responses, it seems to me:
1. Do nothing-stay the course. You have the option of owning some bonds during this. Let's assume everybody knows how this works
2. Run some simple momentum strategy, moving averages, whatever you like.
3. Write some mission rules that say IF the market drops 25% THEN I will change my asset allocation to MORE STOCKS (Not less). This requires you to have some money that wasn't invested in stocks when things are good.
When you backtest these, obviously, having money uninvested just kills the timing strategies. They always lag behind. But if you are interested in "not seeing it going down" then the moving average strategy does chop that off. And if you have enough to retire on and you're just trying to make it through next year without losing half of it, then it's not totally useless.