I'm mixed on Rocket. I do think dropping interest rates will give them a boost, but that will be off-set if we are entering a recession. Overall a good company to own in the long haul, but it may trade more horizontally for the next couple of years.
GOOGL is not never great to own.
I think Palantir is positioned well for a lot of growth over t he next few years. I have a few shares and will probably increase my position over the next few months.
AI is the future, so even though semi-conductor companies like NVDA, AMAT, Broadcom, etc have seen a huge boon the last couple of years, I don't envision it slowing down anytime soon. I'm even considering starting a position in Intel after this sell off. I mean it can't much worse for them right? (famous last words of a fool).
I’m a little worried that AI won’t benefit GOOGL and might even hurt it. But I do think that they will do well during the next positive economic cycle. They’re an advertising business first and they do have YouTube as a very capable content provider. I plan to sign up for the $75 +/- monthly service before football season begins. I would think that those revenues are immaterial relative to their ad sales but it’s probably growing quickly.
RKT just needs to get on a solid footing. I think that they might now be the largest mortgage company. They are coming back from a huge share price crash over the last few years. The stock still has room to grow if using their previous highs as the base.
AMAT seems to never grow steadily. Maybe they have too much competition and no advantage like they probably had when Cisco and Intel were dominating tech hardware.
PLTR is riskier being a smaller company. The smaller techs always concern me after Microsoft took down Novell in networking. But NOVL was more to blame for their own demise. They shouldn’t have gotten into the spreadsheet and word processing software business. PLTR is a stealthier AI player than most. They “should” do well but, again being small, a company like LMT could smash their business. Hopefully they’re good enough at what they do that they’d be a takeover candidate rather than having their revenue being targeted. I also don’t see a defense company like LMT stepping into the commercial side that PLTR is growing (but perhaps GOOGL would).
I look at Akaml much like other techs that aren’t so entrenched, diversified, or have the same scale as the big guys. Good business, but tech is constantly transforming the model.
ISRG is an interesting case. They must have an overwhelming market share and have the recurring revenue stream. Plus, kind of like the old IBM mainframe business, it isn’t easy for customers to switch to a different supplier.
AX seems really risky to me, but the analysts don’t appear to be too worried about their business. They take on high risk, large loan scenarios. They bailed out at least one of Trump’s over-leveraged ventures.
CME just hasn’t been a good stock since I bought it a couple of years ago. I haven’t drilled down into it to try to figure out why they’ve been drifting sideways. Maybe the share price just got too rich to properly reflect the business.