Ernest T. Vol
It's me...Ernest T.
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
- Messages
- 10,229
- Likes
- 18,125
Better than the whore you are putting up.Drumpf completely started the whole tit for tat. He didn't realize politics wasn't for snowflake Yankee.
He is a consistent victim of everything people are doing to him. He is incapable to admit wrong doing or even be self disparaging in a funny way.
At least we can agree that he is a narcissistic prick.
So next time you will be arguing for them to steal the seat? Because precedent? Even if the senate is aligned with the president?It's that the past 150 years of precedent overrides what happened under Andrew Johnson at the end of the Civil war.
When you look at precedent, you start in the present and work your way back.
So trump is also not a lame duck president ....Partisan and biased much? With this logic the country doesn't want a 2nd term of trump because the truest democratic house is the house of reps and definitely went blue in 2018. The house of reps are more responsive to the will of the people due to being based on population and only 2 year terms.
Obama was not lame duck president. Lame duck presidents have their successor named this certainly was not the case in February. Mitch clutched his pearls because he could not stop obama legislation and double downed on zero sum politics.
So trump is also not a lame duck president ....
Well if it walks like a lame duck and quacks like a lame duck...There's actually a lot of variability in the "lame duck" definition. VFFL didn't agree with my comment. It's likely that dems just pick and choose a definition the way they always handle things like that - whether something does or does not benefit their argument. Bill Clinton comes to mind.
There's actually a lot of variability in the "lame duck" definition. VFFL didn't agree with my comment. It's likely that dems just pick and choose a definition the way they always handle things like that - whether something does or does not benefit their argument. Bill Clinton comes to mind.