Sarms58
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 6,411
- Likes
- 8,045
Because there are many who think that if, for example, Michigan wins a close game - both of them make the playoff. The CFP committee would consider just dropping their beloved OSU only down to 4.
There’s no precedent for 8 or 12 jumping 5 with two games to go. The radio talk drama doesn’t change math, ratings, or money. If the Vols win the last two games convincingly, the only one loss teams that can keep them out are UM or OSU. They actually have the sway to stay. No PAC 10 team will catch us if we take care of business.A 12-1 USC is getting in the playoff. A 12-1 UCLA May as well. A 1-loss Michigan isn’t getting in, no matter how close the loss to OSU is. They don’t have the resume.
I agree with this but I really think the loser of that big 10 battle will be left out. Their schedules are really weakThere’s no precedent for 8 or 12 jumping 5 with two games to go. The radio talk drama doesn’t change math, ratings, or money. If the Vols win the last two games convincingly, the only one loss teams that can keep them out are UM or OSU. They actually have the sway to stay. No PAC 10 team will catch us if we take care of business.
It doesn’t matter that there isn’t precedent. A 12-1 University of Southern California isn’t getting left out of the playoffs.There’s no precedent for 8 or 12 jumping 5 with two games to go. The radio talk drama doesn’t change math, ratings, or money. If the Vols win the last two games convincingly, the only one loss teams that can keep them out are UM or OSU. They actually have the sway to stay. No PAC 10 team will catch us if we take care of business.
A 12-1 USC is getting in the playoff. A 12-1 UCLA May as well.
I agree with this but I really think the loser of that big 10 battle will be left out. Their schedules are really weak