BigPapaVol
Wave yo hands in the aiya
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 63,225
- Likes
- 14
Simply, yes. The government has no business in the business of protecting stupid people from themselves.Well first all, ignorance is expensive. I agree that alot of people who didn't read the terms of their loans are at fault. However, the loan officer, company, entity did a poor job of making alot of homebuyers aware of the conditions of thier loan. Those comapnies really didn't care to educate the homebuyers for the sake of fattening thier own pockets. When I was in the insurance industry years ago, I made sure that policyowners knew the benefits and features of thier policy. I educated my clients on the differences of term vs whole life vs variable life. As an agent at the time I felt it was in my best interest to make sure that they were completely aware. Of course, alot of people that jumped on the subprime mortgage bandwagon didn't read the conditions of the loan. However, moral fault lies with the mortgage companies who didn't ensure that their clients were not fully aware. The Government seemed to have no choice but to step in , because there were so many people losing there homes. So, are you guys saying to hell with these ignorant people, let them suffer ?
The comment about moral responsibility residing with the lender is ridiculous. Moral responsibility resides with the borrower to freaking pay the bills he signed up for or repay the money he borrowed. If he signed up for something stupid, he's earned his plight. Personal responsibility is much of what functioning within a democracy is about. Those begging today seem to me to be the ones uncomfortable with taking that responsibility and making something of it.