Any Vols Coming out to California for the Cal Game?

Do you realllllllllllllly think there is a big difference between 92k and 107k? Both are loud, hostile, and no fun.

However, you're really saying Tennessee's HFA was 35 points.

It's not like that was the first game that Neyland has held 100,000+. Cal knew what to expect. That is not a viable excuse at all.
 
what's with all of the in game reporting. they don't write that part down on your record, so nobody tends to care. The part where Cal continues to be a fraud because they can't beat a quality football team, that's what people care about.

Arizona St W 49-21
UCLA W 38-24

does this look like we were outperformed?
 
are you high? cal was up by 28 points against ASU in the second quarter. and by 25 points in the 4th quarter to UCLA.

#22 Arizona St W 49-21
UCLA W 38-24

Most people have a hard time grasping this: winning is an achievement, losing is an achievement. You were outperformed in those games.
 
No it looks like you play in the fudgepac-10. You don't play anyone. And when you actually play a decent team they whip you.
 
Most people have a hard time grasping this: winning is an achievement, losing is an achievement. You were outperformed in those games.

how does a massive beatdown by Cal, which both of those game were, POSSIBLY equate Cal being outperformed. You said cal should have lost those games. Just admit you were wrong. You have no case.
 
how does a massive beatdown by Cal, which both of those game were, POSSIBLY equate Cal being outperformed. You said cal should have lost those games. Just admit you were wrong. You have no case.

By your sense of logic, those two teams should absolutely destroy you in 2007.
 
how does a massive beatdown by Cal, which both of those game were, POSSIBLY equate Cal being outperformed. You said cal should have lost those games. Just admit you were wrong. You have no case.

I have plenty of a case. I can already tell by your tone that you'll dismiss whatever I have to back up my assertions that it's pointless for me to get into it.

See, I can admit Tennessee's shortcomings. I know UT will be defeated. I don't defend my team when certain things are obvious.

However, if you say one thing that a Cal fan disagrees with, you get schlacked.
 
I just looked it up on wikipedia and it says cal only has 2 championship overall. 1920 and 1937. How did you get 3 in the 20's?
 
By your sense of logic, those two teams should absolutely destroy you in 2007.

I don't remember saying Cal would destroy Tenn. And it is entirely possible Cal could lose to ASU or UCLA next season. Both games are on the road and both teams should be massively improved.
 
I have plenty of a case. I can already tell by your tone that you'll dismiss whatever I have to back up my assertions that it's pointless for me to get into it.

See, I can admit Tennessee's shortcomings. I know UT will be defeated. I don't defend my team when certain things are obvious.

However, if you say one thing that a Cal fan disagrees with, you get schlacked.


I'd love to hear how Cal blowing out 2 bowl teams somehow means Cal underperformed and should have lost the two games (which is what you said). Lay it on me my friend.
 
Cal had no title in 1937 - that was Pitt.

Cal won in 1920, 21, and 22

someone, not the AP, awarded us the NC in 1937.

Past Division I-A Football National Champions

1937
California: Dunkel, Helms
1923
California: Houlgate
1922
California: Houlgate, National Championship Foundation*
1921
California: Boand*, Football Research
1920
California: Billingsley, Football Research, Helms, Houlgate, National Championship Foundation
 

VN Store



Back
Top