Appears To Be a Big Push....

#77
#77
it is fulmer's fault, fire fulmer......

oh wait this isn't a fulmer thread....... my bad....
 
#79
#79
I prefer the thick stripes over the double. I would also like to see something more modern perhaps like Miaimi or Oregon's uniforms. In orange and white of course.
 
#80
#80
(ConMan @ Jul 6 said:
I prefer the thick stripes over the double. I would also like to see something more modern perhaps like Miaimi or Oregon's uniforms. In orange and white of course.
You might get crucified for that statement.
 
#81
#81
(ConMan @ Jul 6 said:
I prefer the thick stripes over the double. I would also like to see something more modern perhaps like Miaimi or Oregon's uniforms. In orange and white of course.
yeah, they tried that with the solid stripe up the leg and up the side of the jersey in 02 i think...awful.

these new uni's suck....anybody remember the dual color shoulders on the jersey's of VT and UF last season....ughh.

keep it simple, stupid.
 
#82
#82
no reason to change the whole scheme of the uni to a Nike style. And I dont think Adidas would go for that.
 
#83
#83
I loved the uniforms in 1997, the first year we had Addidas. The numbers and nameplate were stitched on rather than screened, and the road uniforms that year were especially sharp. The numbers were big and easy to recognize, unlike the smaller numbers we have had.
 

Attachments

  • Peyton_1997_Kentucky.bmp
    403.2 KB · Views: 19
#84
#84
i'm glad we went back to the stiched numbers but i'm not a big fan of the oversized numbers.
 
#85
#85
(LetMeStay @ Jul 7 said:
i'm glad we went back to the stiched numbers but i'm not a big fan of the oversized numbers.

Me neither. The oversized numbers are hideous. Does Ohio State still have the huge numbers on their jerseys?
 

VN Store



Back
Top