volfanhill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 34,981
- Likes
- 61,079
There appears to be some sort of inverse relationship between Color and Success.Robin DiAngelo
However, with the emergence of several racial groups that have come to be just as successful as whites, critical race theorists have come up with the term, "white adjacency." Robin DiAngelo, author of the now-infamous book White Fragility, defines it this way: "The closer you are to whiteness—the term often used is white-adjacent—you're still going to experience racism, but there are going to be some benefits due to your perceived proximity to whiteness.
Robin DiAngelo
However, with the emergence of several racial groups that have come to be just as successful as whites, critical race theorists have come up with the term, "white adjacency." Robin DiAngelo, author of the now-infamous book White Fragility, defines it this way: "The closer you are to whiteness—the term often used is white-adjacent—you're still going to experience racism, but there are going to be some benefits due to your perceived proximity to whiteness.
I had not heard this term - “White Adjacent”
Asian Americans have long thrown a wrench in Identity Politics. They completely upend the narrative. Is this the new method to discount them and separate them out from under the ubiquitous “POC” umbrella?
Critical race theory has no idea what to do with Asian Americans | Opinion
What say you?
Are Asian Americans “too white” to be considered a real minority, or are they just White-ish?
What does this mean? Are you saying because Asian Americans succeed that there is no institutional racism?
Asian Americans are basically all self-selected immigrants or the children/grandchildren of immigrants. You are comparing them to people who were slaves for generations then also conditioned by generations of the Jim Crow era (many of the laws are still on the books) and then generations in the era of the war on drugs...it's not a valid comparison for discussing institutional racism and CRT.
All this proves is that you don't have to be white to succeed in America, which all of us know, and in no way refutes CRT.
Show me some actual statistics other than they score better on standardized tests and I'll believe it. Asian culture doesn't lend itself to creativity and superiority, they have a "group think" culture that stifles success. As a whole, they might earn slightly more than whites, but they aren't more successful.You didn’t know that Asians do better than whites in this country? Is that really news to you?
Show me some actual statistics other than they score better on standardized tests and I'll believe it. Asian culture doesn't lend itself to creativity and superiority, they have a "group think" culture that stifles success. As a whole, they might earn slightly more than whites, but they aren't more successful.
What does this mean? Are you saying because Asian Americans succeed that there is no institutional racism?
Asian Americans are basically all self-selected immigrants or the children/grandchildren of immigrants. You are comparing them to people who were slaves for generations then also conditioned by generations of the Jim Crow era (many of the laws are still on the books) and then generations in the era of the war on drugs...it's not a valid comparison for discussing institutional racism and CRT.
All this proves is that you don't have to be white to succeed in America, which all of us know, and in no way refutes CRT.
What does this mean? Are you saying because Asian Americans succeed that there is no institutional racism?
Asian Americans are basically all self-selected immigrants or the children/grandchildren of immigrants. You are comparing them to people who were slaves for generations then also conditioned by generations of the Jim Crow era (many of the laws are still on the books) and then generations in the era of the war on drugs...it's not a valid comparison for discussing institutional racism and CRT.
All this proves is that you don't have to be white to succeed in America, which all of us know, and in no way refutes CRT.
Of course Asian Americans face institutional racism.What does this mean? Are you saying because Asian Americans succeed that there is no institutional racism?
Asian Americans are basically all self-selected immigrants or the children/grandchildren of immigrants. You are comparing them to people who were slaves for generations then also conditioned by generations of the Jim Crow era (many of the laws are still on the books) and then generations in the era of the war on drugs...it's not a valid comparison for discussing institutional racism and CRT.
All this proves is that you don't have to be white to succeed in America, which all of us know, and in no way refutes CRT.
Of course Asian Americans face institutional racism.
And they are thriving.
That’s kinda the point. Right?
Not to me. I look at the argument presented and say, "Despite the fact that some groups succeed, I still think we should try to eliminate institutional racism."
You want to keep it? If not, what is the point?
Seems they value family, hard work/education, community and want more say in the world and not be forgotten.I had not heard this term - “White Adjacent”
Asian Americans have long thrown a wrench in Identity Politics. They completely upend the narrative. Is this the new method to discount them and separate them out from under the ubiquitous “POC” umbrella?
Critical race theory has no idea what to do with Asian Americans | Opinion
What say you?
Are Asian Americans “too white” to be considered a real minority, or are they just White-ish?
Well they certainly aren’t discussing the broader topic of institutional racism in general here.Not to me. I look at the argument presented and say, "Despite the fact that some groups succeed, I still think we should try to eliminate institutional racism."
You want to keep it? If not, what is the point?