Arizona Election Audit

#3,726
#3,726
VolinWayne said:
As far as Ken Bennet quitting, it had to do with him leaking information out. They have said from the start they did not want numbers leaked until the final report was complete.
Click to expand...
That isn't the whole story. Ken Bennett, a Republican and a former Arizona Secretary of State, was serving as an unpaid liaison between the Arizona state legislature and the company performing the audit, Doug Logan's "Cyber Ninjas". Bennett has talked about serious issues he has with how "Cyber Ninjas", has conducted its work. He has specifically criticized the way volunteers entered in tally sheets from vote counts, something that was also flagged by observers sent by the current Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs. What is the point of having a liaison in communication with a congressional oversight body, if that person is not allowed to convey concerns over the work being done in real time? That's not transparency. This audit is a farce of a partisan political exercise.
 
Last edited:
#3,729
#3,729
BowlBrother85 said:
That isn't the whole story. Ken Bennett, a Republican and a former Arizona Secretary of State, was serving as an unpaid liaison between the Arizona state legislature and the company performing the audit, Doug Logan's "Cyber Ninjas". Bennett has talked about serious issues he has with how "Cyber Ninjas", has conducted its work. He has specifically criticized the way volunteers entered in tally sheets from vote counts, something that was also flagged by observers sent by the current Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs. What is the point of having a liaison in communication with a congressional oversight body, if that person is not allowed to convey concerns over the work being done in real time? That's not transparency. This audit is a farce of a partisan political exercise.
Click to expand...
Actually in his last interview he was worried and justly so about 3rd count being made to match one of the others...while he was locked out for revealing info that got leaked..he has sense stated he is still the liason and will have full acess when Helping put together the final report..he didnt have transparency issues till locked....do you have a.link to that story where it Bennet's makes that statement before he was locked out??
 
#3,730
#3,730
whodeycin85 said:
Actually in his last interview he was worried and justly so about 3rd count being made to match one of the others...while he was locked out for revealing info that got leaked..he has sense stated he is still the liason and will have full acess when Helping put together the final report..he didnt have transparency issues till locked....do you have a.link to that story where it Bennet's words not MSM bias account??
Click to expand...
That is not exactly what he said. Per azmirror.com, in an interview with KFYI, Bennett said, "I will absolutely be a part of helping vet the final report, but it's not just at the last minute - slam, bam and endorse it for us. I cannot put a rubber stamp on a product that I am being locked out of its development." This hardly sounds like a transparent process.

... and the "info" he disclosed to the Arizona state legislature was data that runs counter to the desired conclusion of the Cyber Ninjas (a supposedly independent firm with ties to the 2020 Trump Campaign and conflicts of interest all over the place).
 
#3,731
#3,731
BowlBrother85 said:
That is not exactly what he said. Per azmirror.com, in an interview with KFYI, Bennett said, "I will absolutely be a part of helping vet the final report, but it's not just at the last minute - slam, bam and endorse it for us. I cannot put a rubber stamp on a product that I am being locked out of its development." This hardly sounds like a transparent process.

... and the "info" he disclosed to the Arizona state legislature was data that runs counter to the desired conclusion of the Cyber Ninjas (a supposedly independent firm with ties to the 2020 Trump Campaign and conflicts of interest all over the place).
Click to expand...
Again he was fine with the audit until locked out..in his interview with James T Harris is clearly states he gave info to a 3rs party friend...who then released it to the media leading to his blocking...he never said the info release was counter to the audit...thats a guess by the media trying to make it more then it is.is...

think about it..if the info was counter to the audit. after the lockout he wouldn't still be supporting it or working on it.....and he is back on the final report which he will have full access for approving it or not
 
#3,732
#3,732
BowlBrother85 said:
That isn't the whole story. Ken Bennett, a Republican and a former Arizona Secretary of State, was serving as an unpaid liaison between the Arizona state legislature and the company performing the audit, Doug Logan's "Cyber Ninjas". Bennett has talked about serious issues he has with how "Cyber Ninjas", has conducted its work. He has specifically criticized the way volunteers entered in tally sheets from vote counts, something that was also flagged by observers sent by the current Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs. What is the point of having a liaison in communication with a congressional oversight body, if that person is not allowed to convey concerns over the work being done in real time? That's not transparency. This audit is a farce of a partisan political exercise.
Click to expand...


When was this?? I honestly do not recall this. I remember him discussing issues with the way the county had entered the tally sheets and there being no serial numbers to match up with adjudicated ballots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#3,734
#3,734
VolinWayne said:
When was this?? I honestly do not recall this. I remember him discussing issues with the way the county had entered the tally sheets and there being no serial numbers to match up with adjudicated ballots.
Click to expand...
Those "serious issues" of Ken Bennett's were reported by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy of AZMirror.com on July 28, 2021 at 11:17 AM. That was cited in the article with the headline that read:

"UPDATED: Ken Bennett strikes deal to stay on as Senate's 'audit' liaison"

I think you would find it in the 4th paragraph from the bottom of the article.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#3,735
#3,735
BowlBrother85 said:
Those "serious issues" of Ken Bennett's were reported by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy of AZMirror.com on July 28, 2021 at 11:17 AM. That was cited in the article with the headline that read:

"UPDATED: Ken Bennett strikes deal to stay on as Senate's 'audit' liaison"

I think you would find it in the 4th paragraph from the bottom of the article.
Click to expand...
Again that came after he was barred..it was flawed cuz wasn't able to overaee the process and asked to still sign off....if he believed the process was flawed then why go back and be part of the process....he messed up releasing details...he did so to friends and they leaked the info....listen to the interview he clearly states this..and az mirror is putting thier spin on it
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#3,736
#3,736
VolinWayne said:
Good one. He lost me at " Only around tweet No. 50 did I comprehend how mentally oppressive I’ve come to find it to live in a country in which about a quarter of the other people are, for all intents and purposes, members of a cult."

Reaply!! Mentally oppressive??
Click to expand...
He trolls randos on Twitter and thinks it’s some kind of serious thing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and VolinWayne
#3,737
#3,737
whodeycin85 said:
Again that came after he was barred..it was flawed cuz wasn't able to overaee the process and asked to still sign off....if he believed the process was flawed then why go back and be part of the process....he messed up releasing details...he did so to friends and they leaked the info....listen to the interview he clearly states this..and az mirror is putting thier spin on it
Click to expand...
That is wrong. Bennett has criticized a specific procedure (the way volunteers entered in tally sheets from vote counts). This same thing also raised concerns from observers sent by the current Arizona Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs. As a liaison, it is his job to observe and report. That is true whether the audit being conducted is legitimate or not. There is no spin in that article. Ridiculous.
 
#3,738
#3,738
whodeycin85 said:
Again that came after he was barred..it was flawed cuz wasn't able to overaee the process and asked to still sign off....if he believed the process was flawed then why go back and be part of the process....he messed up releasing details...he did so to friends and they leaked the info....listen to the interview he clearly states this..and az mirror is putting thier spin on it
Click to expand...

Haven't people connected to this cluster been releasing details for months? That's pretty much the driving force behind this thread.
 
#3,739
#3,739
BowlBrother85 said:
Those "serious issues" of Ken Bennett's were reported by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy of AZMirror.com on July 28, 2021 at 11:17 AM. That was cited in the article with the headline that read:

"UPDATED: Ken Bennett strikes deal to stay on as Senate's 'audit' liaison"

I think you would find it in the 4th paragraph from the bottom of the article.
Click to expand...

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I'd love to see the interview and be able to actually hear exactly what Ken said he had an issue with. I can certainly understand him not wanting to put a "rubberstamp" on the report if he doesn't really have anything to do with the report. At the end of the day the final report is going to have to be presented in a way that is clear to all parties what the actual results were. Hopefully they will find a way to do this with undeniable facts and evidence to back up the final results whatever they may reveal.
 
#3,740
#3,740
clarksvol00 said:
Haven't people connected to this cluster been releasing details for months? That's pretty much the driving force behind this thread.
Click to expand...

Updates have been made on a regular basis of where they were with the audit counts as well as updates on subpoenas (that have not been complied with) to the country for routers, passwords etc. There was supposed to be no leaks at all of actual numbers or data from the audit itself until the final report. They had a Senate hearing a few weeks ago and revealed some preliminary numbers which were provided to show why the needed the items from the county that had been subpoened for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#3,742
#3,742
BowlBrother85 said:
That is wrong. Bennett has criticized a specific procedure (the way volunteers entered in tally sheets from vote counts). This same thing also raised concerns from observers sent by the current Arizona Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs. As a liaison, it is his job to observe and report. That is true whether the audit being conducted is legitimate or not. There is no spin in that article. Ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Again he made that comments after being barred
..show me where he said anything discourgaing about the audit before he was banned....and again that issue he explained was because he was barred he was worried the last count would be made to match one of the first counts...your taking stiff outta context to try and discredit the audit....and if there were any serious doubt why did he agree to come back as he will have full acess to verify it was done correctly....
 
#3,744
#3,744
whodeycin85 said:
Again he made that comments after being barred
..show me where he said anything discourgaing about the audit before he was banned....and again that issue he explained was because he was barred he was worried the last count would be made to match one of the first counts...your taking stiff outta context to try and discredit the audit....and if there were any serious doubt why did he agree to come back as he will have full acess to verify it was done correctly....
Click to expand...
That issue he raised has nothing to do with him being banned from the building. Before anyone can be discredited, they must first have some semblance of credibility and legitimacy to begin with. The "Cyber Ninjas" have neither. They do not need any discrediting. There were already enough conflicts of interest associated with Doug Logan before this audit even started.

Bennett is just a liaison... not a part of the audit itself. He agreed to return because that is the task that he had accepted. He is there to observe and report.
 
#3,745
#3,745
tnmarktx said:
Cyber Symposium: Prove Mike Wrong - Lindell TV

To all of you that are so sure the election was free and fair, why not go get this money?
Click to expand...

What's left of his cognitive reasoning skills after years of drug abuse will not allow him to accept any hypothesis or proof other than his own. It's hard to reason with someone who is suffering from scarring to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. (Colihart et al. 2018; Schulreich et al. 2021) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (Asp et al. 2012, Asp, Ramchandan, and Tranel, 2012; Fellows & Farah, 2007)
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankenVol54
#3,746
#3,746
AshG said:
What's left of his cognitive reasoning skills after years of drug abuse will not allow him to accept any hypothesis or proof other than his own. It's hard to reason with someone who is suffering from scarring to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. (Colihart et al. 2018; Schulreich et al. 2021) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (Asp et al. 2012, Asp, Ramchandan, and Tranel, 2012; Fellows & Farah, 2007)
Click to expand...

Got get your 5 million from him
 
#3,747
#3,747
AshG said:
What's left of his cognitive reasoning skills after years of drug abuse will not allow him to accept any hypothesis or proof other than his own. It's hard to reason with someone who is suffering from scarring to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. (Colihart et al. 2018; Schulreich et al. 2021) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (Asp et al. 2012, Asp, Ramchandan, and Tranel, 2012; Fellows & Farah, 2007)
Click to expand...

Lol, why not use your supreme intelligence to best, in your opinion, the brain damaged junky?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, UT_Dutchman, WeeohdeeWood and 1 other person
#3,748
#3,748
tnmarktx said:
Lol, why not use your supreme intelligence to best, in your opinion, the brain damaged junky?
Click to expand...

I have no supreme intelligence. I just thought I'd be kind this time and point people to some of the places I got my information from.

There is no convincing him, period. I believe that Jesus Christ himself could split the eastern sky, descend in front of Lindell, tell Lindell that the election was not rigged, and Lindell would reply, "You're in on it too?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankenVol54
#3,749
#3,749
AshG said:
I have no supreme intelligence. I just thought I'd be kind this time and point people to some of the places I got my information from.

There is no convincing him, period. I believe that Jesus Christ himself could split the eastern sky, descend in front of Lindell, tell Lindell that the election was not rigged, and Lindell would reply, "You're in on it too?"
Click to expand...
You obviously no nothing about Lindell, his Christianity is of utmost importance to him. Attend the symposium and show him. If I believed it was free and fair, I'd be going for the 5 mil. I've heard many on here say beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was free and fair, go get that money.
 
#3,750
#3,750
I've come to the conclusion that anyone that thinks this past election was free and fair falls into one or more of these categories: 1) hatred for Trump overrides cognitive process 2) brain dead or 3) ultra gullible and believe everything state/federal governments and MSM puts out (similar to item #2; take same approach to Covid).

Even if I were Biden's #1 fan, I'd still be for audits considering all of the election anomalies, witness testimonies, affidavits, statistical impossibilities, etc. I've seen over the past several months. Another BIG indicator is the stance the democrats have taken regarding election fraud. Back in 2016 to 2018, there are numerous videos of people like Kamala Harris questioning voting machine security. Heck, the entire narrative was that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. Remember? Now, the shoe is on the other foot and they claim that there was no fraud and censor anyone who does. Ding, ding, ding... wake up people!!!

Why not encourage audits everywhere? If everything was on the up and up, they could stick it right back in the face of the Trump crowd. That's not what we see because they have something to hide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, 825VOL, AM64 and 2 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top