Arizona Election Audit

You obviously no nothing about Lindell, his Christianity is of utmost importance to him. Attend the symposium and show him. If I believed it was free and fair, I'd be going for the 5 mil. I've heard many on here say beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was free and fair, go get that money.

It is an impossibly quixotic subjective task.
 
Proving a brain damaged junky wrong shouldn't be hard. Attend the symposium and demonstrate it live. Hire a cyber expert, you'll have plenty of money left over.
At least the brain dead junky can make complete sentences and run a multimillion dollar business as opposed to some dementia patients we know…
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I've come to the conclusion that anyone that thinks this past election was free and fair falls into one or more of these categories: 1) hatred for Trump overrides cognitive process 2) brain dead or 3) ultra gullible and believe everything state/federal governments and MSM puts out (similar to item #2; take same approach to Covid).

Even if I were Biden's #1 fan, I'd still be for audits considering all of the election anomalies, witness testimonies, affidavits, statistical impossibilities, etc. I've seen over the past several months. Another BIG indicator is the stance the democrats have taken regarding election fraud. Back in 2016 to 2018, there are numerous videos of people like Kamala Harris questioning voting machine security. Heck, the entire narrative was that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. Remember? Now, the shoe is on the other foot and they claim that there was no fraud and censor anyone who does. Ding, ding, ding... wake up people!!!

Why not encourage audits everywhere? If everything was on the up and up, they could stick it right back in the face of the Trump crowd. That's not what we see because they have something to hide.
If you can't beat'em join'em.
 
I've come to the conclusion that anyone that thinks this past election was free and fair falls into one or more of these categories: 1) hatred for Trump overrides cognitive process 2) brain dead or 3) ultra gullible and believe everything state/federal governments and MSM puts out
Which one of these things is Trump's own former Attorney General William Barr?

"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election."
- Attorney General William Barr, December 1, 2020

Even if I were Biden's #1 fan, I'd still be for audits considering all of the election anomalies, witness testimonies, affidavits, statistical impossibilities, etc.

Why not encourage audits everywhere? If everything was on the up and up, they could stick it right back in the face of the Trump crowd. That's not what we see because they have something to hide.
It is a disingenuous narrative, to claim that recounts, accuracy tests, and audits have not been sufficiently performed in Maricopa County in the state of Arizona. There is nothing wrong with election audits, and in the case of the 2020 Presidential General Election from Maricopa County, they have already been done. There have been multiple hand recounts with accuracy tests performed, and multiple forensic audits conducted by certified, independent personnel - SLI Compliance and Pro V&V. The fact is, the 2020 Presidential Election voting tabulations in Maricopa County were already the most heavily scrutinized election results in the history of American democracy before this "Cyber Ninjas" audit had even started.

Democrats are only objecting to this one audit, because an audit should not be conducted by a company whose founder and CEO (Doug Logan) has already publicly announced a definitive conclusion as to the result, before his own audit had begun. Doug Logan is a Trump donor, whose ties to Trump campaign attorney, Sidney Powell, are well-documented. The reality is that there will never be enough audits or recounts performed to satisfy those Trump supporters who are disappointed with his defeat... just as there isn't a set of conditions under which Donald Trump could ever lose an election, without completely attributing his defeat to the illicit activity of others.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ClearwaterVol
Which one of these things is Trump's own former Attorney General William Barr?

"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election."
- Attorney General William Barr, December 1, 2020




It is a disingenuous narrative, to claim that recounts, accuracy tests, and audits have not been sufficiently performed in Maricopa County in the state of Arizona. There is nothing wrong with election audits, and in the case of the 2020 Presidential General Election from Maricopa County, they have already been done. There have been multiple hand recounts with accuracy tests performed, and multiple forensic audits conducted by certified, independent personnel - SLI Compliance and Pro V&V. The fact is, the 2020 Presidential Election voting tabulations in Maricopa County were already the most heavily scrutinized election results in the history of American democracy before this "Cyber Ninjas" audit had even started.

Democrats are only objecting to this one audit, because an audit should not be conducted by a company whose founder and CEO (Doug Logan) has already publicly announced a definitive conclusion as to the result, before his own audit had begun. Doug Logan is a Trump donor, whose ties to Trump campaign attorney, Sidney Powell, are well-documented. The reality is that there will never be enough audits or recounts performed to satisfy those Trump supporters who are disappointed with his defeat... just as there isn't a set of conditions that Donald Trump could ever lose an election, without completely attributing his defeat to the illicit activity of others.
Why doesn't Bill Barr go expose Lindell for a fraud? I mean he could get that money and save democracy, right?
 
Proving a brain damaged junky wrong shouldn't be hard. Attend the symposium and demonstrate it live. Hire a cyber expert, you'll have plenty of money left over.
Proving a brain damaged junky wrong shouldn't be hard. Attend the symposium and demonstrate it live. Hire a cyber expert, you'll have plenty of money left over.

As others have stated, convincing him is impossible.
 
Because only fellow conspiracy theorists take Mike Lindell seriously. There is no need to "expose Lindell for a fraud". That cat escaped the bag a long time ago...
Lol, I've heard for months now how recounts, audits, and a mountain of evidence shows how free and fair this election is. When a brain dead junky and a liar (all of this according to those that claim it was free and fair) has the balls to put a challenge up and offers $5 million to come and show him a fraud, there's nothing but smack talk.
 
Lol, I've heard for months now how recounts, audits, and a mountain of evidence shows how free and fair this election is. When a brain dead junky and a liar (all of this according to those that claim it was free and fair) has the balls to put a challenge up and offers $5 million to come and show him a fraud, there's nothing but smack talk.
LOL. If Lindell is serving as the lone arbiter of the evidence... then the lure of financial reward is a hollow gesture. The only thing he is truly offering is a dog and pony show.
 
LOL. If Lindell is serving as the lone arbiter of the evidence... then the lure of financial reward is a hollow gesture. The only thing he is truly offering is a dog and pony show.
Go show the public he's a fraud. We're all waiting to cheer you on.
 
Frankly speaking , there should be audits every election . Why not ? We should be able to believe in our voting system. I haven't had faith since gore/bush ..And hell I was for bush ..(Stupid mistake ).
Personally I think Gore got screwed ..Even some of the Obama/Hillary primary wasn't on the up and up..Voter id is a must ..
 
That issue he raised has nothing to do with him being banned from the building. Before anyone can be discredited, they must first have some semblance of credibility and legitimacy to begin with. The "Cyber Ninjas" have neither. They do not need any discrediting. There were already enough conflicts of interest associated with Doug Logan before this audit even started.

Bennett is just a liaison... not a part of the audit itself. He agreed to return because that is the task that he had accepted. He is there to observe and report.
Show me the link were that issue was raised before he was banned....
 
Once again the government doesn't like it when someone else attempts to do what they've spent years perfecting.

We're talking about twitter, not the government. So not sure what point you're making.
 
Updates have been made on a regular basis of where they were with the audit counts as well as updates on subpoenas (that have not been complied with) to the country for routers, passwords etc. There was supposed to be no leaks at all of actual numbers or data from the audit itself until the final report. They had a Senate hearing a few weeks ago and revealed some preliminary numbers which were provided to show why the needed the items from the county that had been subpoened for.

Lol. Boo hoo.

He "leaked" truth before they got the chance to create a narrative.

Math don't lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAFgolferVol
Which one of these things is Trump's own former Attorney General William Barr?

"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election."
- Attorney General William Barr, December 1, 2020




It is a disingenuous narrative, to claim that recounts, accuracy tests, and audits have not been sufficiently performed in Maricopa County in the state of Arizona. There is nothing wrong with election audits, and in the case of the 2020 Presidential General Election from Maricopa County, they have already been done. There have been multiple hand recounts with accuracy tests performed, and multiple forensic audits conducted by certified, independent personnel - SLI Compliance and Pro V&V. The fact is, the 2020 Presidential Election voting tabulations in Maricopa County were already the most heavily scrutinized election results in the history of American democracy before this "Cyber Ninjas" audit had even started.

Democrats are only objecting to this one audit, because an audit should not be conducted by a company whose founder and CEO (Doug Logan) has already publicly announced a definitive conclusion as to the result, before his own audit had begun. Doug Logan is a Trump donor, whose ties to Trump campaign attorney, Sidney Powell, are well-documented. The reality is that there will never be enough audits or recounts performed to satisfy those Trump supporters who are disappointed with his defeat... just as there isn't a set of conditions under which Donald Trump could ever lose an election, without completely attributing his defeat to the illicit activity of others.
You obviously are in the dark about what's going on. Biden went to PA himself (or so it was reported) to try to stop audits. Dems are trying to block audits in GA, MI, NV... wherever the people want to have them. Has nothing to do with Cyber Ninjas.

The SLI/Pro V&V audits were nothing more than machine checks (the Maricopa official report was posted a while back). Only way to have a true audit is ballot by ballot. Going to be interesting to see the official AZ audit report. I suspect some of the results will be so cut and dried the "CN spiked the audit" argument will be moot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolinWayne
You obviously are in the dark about what's going on. Biden went to PA himself (or so it was reported) to try to stop audits. Dems are trying to block audits in GA, MI, NV... wherever the people want to have them. Has nothing to do with Cyber Ninjas.

The SLI/Pro V&V audits were nothing more than machine checks (the Maricopa official report was posted a while back). Only way to have a true audit is ballot by ballot. Going to be interesting to see the official AZ audit report. I suspect some of the results will be so cut and dried the "CN spiked the audit" argument will be moot.

It is so fun to watch you guys continually believe that something definitive will be discovered. I imagine you still believe in the pedo cabal that is the democratic party and that Trump is going to order massive arrests next wednesday as he strides back into the white house as president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
Frankly speaking , there should be audits every election . Why not ? We should be able to believe in our voting system. I haven't had faith since gore/bush ..And hell I was for bush ..(Stupid mistake ).
Personally I think Gore got screwed ..Even some of the Obama/Hillary primary wasn't on the up and up..Voter id is a must ..


I might add that the audits need to be full forensic audits and they need to be done by someone other then SLI Compliance and Pro V&V as they both have to many ties to Dominion and Smartmatic. Quite a few people have transitioned from working for one of the 2 Voting Machine Companies to the 2 auditing companies. I think it's critical that we the people be able to choose the auditors.
 
We're talking about twitter, not the government. So not sure what point you're making.
They could be interpreted as Twitter or government. I went with the latter for some ironic comedy... Because it's true, no one can destroy faith in government as well as the government can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top