Arizona Election Audit

#4,030
#4,030
VolinWayne said:
Your faith in the FBI explains it all. It has been proven over and over how easy it is. You can keep lying to yourself and others if you want to but you are just straight up wrong on this issue and yoy know it but refuse to admit it

Here's Mrs. Kamala making the claim

Click to expand...
It certainly has not been proven by whatever extremist garbage you just posted. It's clear that you assign credibility, not based upon credentials, but rather to sources which support your narrative. An objective and reasonable person, interested in the facts, will not take the word of the lunatic fringe over the professional opinions of analysts in the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency from within the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI.
 
#4,033
#4,033
BowlBrother85 said:
It certainly has not been proven by whatever extremist garbage you just posted. It's clear that you assign credibility, not based upon credentials, but rather to sources which support your narrative. An objective and reasonable person, interested in the facts, will not take the word of the lunatic fringe over the professional opinions of analysts in the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency from within the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI.
Click to expand...

The extremist garbage was just a bunch of Democrats who you look up to who were saying what I am saying. The only difference is it was before the 2020 election. I'm done arguing with you. I won this argument
 
#4,036
#4,036
May as well be trying to convince people in here to believe / not believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster (may we be touched by his noodly appendage).

You can't prove to me that the planets aren't Holy Meatballs that were placed in the sky to demonstrate the mighty power of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (may we be touched by his noodly appendage).

R'amen.
 
#4,041
#4,041
AshG said:
No one has disproven my proof that we're living on a Holy Meatball. I win the argument!
Click to expand...


Provide a video of your proof on live TV and I will at least give it an attempt. You guys say that the video on CNN of vote flippimg is being taken out of context but nobody can actually explain why this happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and AM64
#4,042
#4,042
utvolpj said:
Infrastructure, lobbyists in govt, ACA replace, lock her up, cut spending, take on dept of Ed, get a reimbursement check from Mexico, real immigration reform, etc.

When you think about it he really didn't do that much. Maybe that's a positive?
Click to expand...
You said you wanted less government!

I do think Trump underestimated how difficult it would be to get things done in general and underestimated how much opposition he would face from both sides. By the same token, there’s no question Congress over complicates things and makes them seem harder than they really are on purpose. Congress isn’t in the business of fixing issues as they need issues for platforms and job security.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 825VOL, 82_VOL_83, AM64 and 1 other person
#4,044
#4,044
VolinWayne said:
You are lying once again. He is probably talking about this which did happen on CNN. I went ahead and attached 2 screenshots as I realize you probably won't take the time to watch the video. Not the time which is displayed on both. This shows exactly 19,958 votes being switched from Trump to Biden which means Biden gained nearly 40,000 votes.

ELECTION NIGHT ERRORS - HOW DID THAT HAPPEN?View attachment 384765View attachment 384766
Click to expand...

I will have a go. CNN isn't tapped into the voting machines therefore the totals are not official. They are received from
Edison Research, which provides vote tabulation data to CNN and other networks, said that the moment of Trump dropping by 19,958 was caused by a brief reporting error on its end.

Rob Farbman, Edison’s executive vice president, told us that Edison did receive the correct vote totals from Armstrong County in Pennsylvania through a state feed — which at that point in time was 24,233 votes for Trump and 4,275 votes for Biden. But a team member, while scouring individual county vote totals, then mistakenly entered the county’s totals backwards — 24,233 votes for Biden and 4,275 votes for Trump.

A CNN source also confirmed that the matter came down to vote totals in Armstrong County being briefly transposed in the feed provided to the network, but that the accurate figures were soon restored.

“It was simple human error,” Farbman told us by email, noting the mistake was corrected about an hour later.

Trump has secured 27,340 votes in Armstrong County, compared with Biden’s 8,417.
 
#4,046
#4,046
hUTch2002 said:
You said you wanted less government!

I do think Trump underestimated how difficult it would be to get things done in general and underestimated how much opposition he would face from both sides. By the same token, there’s no question Congress over complicates things and makes them seem harder than they really are on purpose. Congress isn’t in the business of fixing issues as they need issues for platforms and job security.
Click to expand...

Congress and especially government bureaucracies are organisms like a virus that will do anything to protect and procreate. Trump like anybody who threatens them never stood a chance. People who "run" bureaucracies are simply lame ducks who are there until the organism can purge them. Example: the current passport backup. Bureaucratic solution: more staff. Example: new head of XYZ orders unpopular (with the bureaucracy) changes to improve efficiency. Bureaucratic solution and result: Malicious compliance, unintended consequences, everything goes to hell in a hand basket; new guy loses job, and life resorts to normal - like a little intestinal bug that gets eliminated. BTW, bureaucracies are protected organisms - no nasty "at will" clauses for them, so mass noncompliance with new directives is just no big deal ... except to the new guy who decided to rock the boat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#4,047
#4,047
AshG said:
May as well be trying to convince people in here to believe / not believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster (may we be touched by his noodly appendage).

You can't prove to me that the planets aren't Holy Meatballs that were placed in the sky to demonstrate the mighty power of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (may we be touched by his noodly appendage).

R'amen.
Click to expand...
*Bar-b-que Sketti!!!
 
#4,048
#4,048
ClearwaterVol said:
And we shall count them on our abacus.

Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.

The vote was fair and accurate.
Click to expand...
I watched Back to School as well. And thus my avi.
 
#4,049
#4,049
BowlBrother85 said:
Reuters.com

"FBI, DHS say they have 'not identified' hacking schemes to change vote tallies ahead of U.S. election"

By Christopher Bing / Thursday September 24, 2020 / 1:14 PM EDT

(Reuters) - U.S. security agencies say they are not aware of any cyber threats that could change vote tallies or "manipulate votes at scale" in the Nov. 3 presidential election, according to a public service announcement released on Thursday.

"The FBI and CISA have not identified any incidents, to date, capable of preventing Americans from voting or changing vote tallies for the 2020 Elections," the announcement said. CISA, known as the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, is a division of the Homeland Security Department focused on digital security issues.

The statement mirrors past comments from top U.S. security officials, who have said a mass hack to alter voting results would be nearly impossible because of the United States' decentralized voting system and the availability of fail-safes, such as provisional ballots.

Over the last two years, since the 2018 U.S. midterm election, senior U.S. intelligence officials have openly predicted that hackers associated with Russia, China, Iran and North Korea would attempt to target the 2020 U.S. presidential election.

Officials do say that a cyberattack against computer systems which store voter information could slow down the voting process, but not hinder it. Such systems are not used to cast votes, but help in administering the election.

The PSA is the second of its kind in recent weeks. The last announcement cautioned Americans to seek out information about the election from trusted voices, such as local and state officials, due to the threat of foreign disinformation operations.
Click to expand...
I’m not saying this happened but you wouldn’t need it on a large scale. Again, this basically came down to 5 cities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, Orangeburst and AM64
#4,050
#4,050
hUTch2002 said:
I’m not saying this happened but you wouldn’t need it on a large scale. Again, this basically came down to 5 cities.
Click to expand...
5 cities would definitely qualify as a mass hack, which top officials in the CISA of the Department of Homeland Security have described as being "nearly impossible".

"The statement mirrors past comments from top U.S. security officials, who have said a mass hack to alter voting results would be nearly impossible because of the United States' decentralized voting system and the availability of fail-safes, such as provisional ballots."

It simply didn't happen, and that is what would have been required for fraudulent activity to have had an impact on any of the statewide outcomes from the 2020 presidential election.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top