Arizona Election Audit

#4,276
#4,276
clarksvol00 said:
Once again, sorry I'm not playing whatabout with you. I might have, but like i said I'm not going to have a serious discussion about my position on anything with you after you started throwing out names and making up arguments for people. Its a personal rule I've been trying to follow.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't answer if I were you either.

You can't throw stones if you live in glass houses. That's what this comes down to. If you can't look in the mirror and realize your dou le standard then that's on you. You call it whataboutism, I call it consistency.

You mentioned your position on Kavanaugh wasn't known and I was making assumptions on your stance. You've yet to criticize that which tells me you're ok with what they did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, W.TN.Orange Blood and VolinWayne
#4,277
#4,277
InVOLuntary said:
I wouldn't answer if I were you either.

You can't throw stones if you live in glass houses. That's what this comes down to. If you can't look in the mirror and realize your dou le standard then that's on you. You call it whataboutism, I call it consistency.

You mentioned your position on Kavanaugh wasn't known and I was making assumptions on your stance. You've yet to criticize that which tells me you're ok with what they did.
Click to expand...

You are more than welcome to make up an argument for me on something that happened before I began posting. I do not feel the need to go back and opine on every issue that has come up since the beginning of time. I certainly won't do it to satisfy your whatabout after you assumed I had a certain position on those issues.
 
#4,278
#4,278
clarksvol00 said:
You are more than welcome to make up an argument for me on something that happened before I began posting. I do not feel the need to go back and opine on every issue that has come up since the beginning of time. I certainly won't do it to satisfy your whatabout after you assumed I had a certain position on those issues.
Click to expand...
I've made up nothing. I asked you if you were OK with those things. You continue to avoid the questions. That's fine.
 
#4,281
#4,281

It was an "if" then "statement". Are you ok with it? Again, I was giving you a chance to clarify your position.
 
#4,284
#4,284
InVOLuntary said:
Then you need to work with your party and let them know. That's a slippery slope we find ourselves going down. Do you think Obama is responsible for the cops that were gun downed in Texas? I mean he really didn't come out and squash all the calls to violence against police that was going on at the time. Should we hold the democrats responsible for the riots that went on last spring? I mean they really didn't come out and attempt to quell the violence. Didn't Harris sort of "incite" that stuff by her words.on the campaign trail?
Click to expand...
You're not talking about the same thing at all.

That mob of people was only on Pennsylvania Avenue that day, because Trump had called for a rally on January 6th in front of the White House, and (1) falsely claimed that it was still possible for him to retain the presidency. That crowd only walked down to the Capitol after Trump's speech, because Trump had also (2) falsely claimed that Mike Pence had the power to reject votes from certain electors, but he just didn't have the courage to do it.

I wouldn't go as far as saying that Trump incited the riot, but the Capitol incursion would not have happened without these 2 false claims of his.
 
#4,287
#4,287
BowlBrother85 said:
You're not talking about the same thing at all.

That mob of people was only on Pennsylvania Avenue that day, because Trump had called for a rally on January 6th in front of the White House, and (1) falsely claimed that it was still possible for him to retain the presidency. That crowd only walked down to the Capitol after Trump's speech, because Trump had also (2) falsely claimed that Mike Pence had the power to reject votes from certain electors, but he just didn't have the courage to do it.

I wouldn't go as far as saying that Trump incited the riot, but the Capitol incursion would not have happened without these 2 false claims of his.
Click to expand...
It is the same thing. What you're saying is that Trump through his words caused people to act in a totally different than the context of his message. What you're complaining about is that he didn't do enough to discourage it. Same with the dems in those cities, Harris, and Obama. They could have done more, said more but they didn't.
 
#4,289
#4,289
clarksvol00 said:
I don't see an "if."
Click to expand...
I used the word "When" essentially the same thing as using the "If" in this scenario. It was a blanket statement that accused folks that condoned those tactics. I don't know how whether you condone those tactics because you've refused to answer.
 
#4,293
#4,293
K-town Vol Fan said:
Its a pretty bad look when you have a 6th grade level grammar mistake in the same post where you're insulting someone else's intelligence.
Click to expand...
Oh come on: you're example doesn't look good. Sight the chapter and verse in the Harbrace handbook that covers this.
 
#4,294
#4,294
InVOLuntary said:
It is the same thing. What you're saying is that Trump through his words caused people to act in a totally different than the context of his message. What you're complaining about is that he didn't do enough to discourage it. Same with the dems in those cities, Harris, and Obama. They could have done more, said more but they didn't.
Click to expand...
I'm saying that the Capitol incursion was a mob's response to lies they had been told by someone they trusted. That trusted person, who lied to them, was Donald Trump.

Those 2 lies were:

(1) It was still possible for Trump to retain the presidency on January 6th.

(2) Mike Pence could help Trump retain the presidency on January 6th, because Pence had the power to reject votes from electors chosen in states that Donald Trump had claimed were rigged.
 
#4,296
#4,296
InVOLuntary said:
I feel sorry for partisan hacks such as yourself. You are ok with any and all investigations as long as it's your political enemies being investigated. You're completely ok with fabricated evidence to justify an investigation, as long as it's being done by your liberal, communist party. At least be honest and own that you are willing to accept immoral, unethical, and illegal tactics to advance your parties political agenda. Ends justify the means, amaright?
Click to expand...
1628541434446.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs and BowlBrother85
#4,297
#4,297
How about y'all just start saying "I know you are, but what am I?" back and forth to each other and stop pretending to have some form of high ground.
 
#4,300
#4,300
InVOLuntary said:
A magnifying glass? I agree we need to look deeper into the democrats communist manifesto.
Click to expand...

Trump ws imnpeached for supposedly conspiring to have a foreign nation investigate a corrupt company whose political opponenent's son sat on the board.
Trump investigated and spied on by DC, nothing but applause. Could you imagine if the show was on the other foot? Just the same as comparing 1/6 and the summer riots. Not justified, justified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and InVOLuntary
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top