NEVolFan
Ima dude playing a dude..
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2006
- Messages
- 20,679
- Likes
- 23,972
Did the judge sanction the attorneys for making claims in interviews or did she sanction them for making baseless claims in a lawsuit? There is a rather large difference.
Also, the fact that you rely on some hack with 475 followers for your arguments is pitiful. My teen aged daughter has nearly 100,000 followers. I can get her to provide you with some hair brained political arguments, as well.
Judge Orders Sanctions Against Pro-Trump Lawyers Over Election Lawsuit
Not that it matters but where are you coming up with 475 followers. That hack has 127k followers (not that it matters). The video compilation shows exactly what it shows and it doesn't matter who shares it. It simply speaks for itself.
Is Rumble what happens when Parler and 4Chan have a baby?
What's the over under on the "report" being released to the public this year?
Rumble is what happens when big tech thinks it is ok for them to decide what my opinion is and what opinions are being shared. The simple fact that you are completely ok with this says all we need to know about you.
I'm just as ready for the report as you are.
Did the judge sanction the attorneys for making claims in interviews or did she sanction them for making baseless claims in a lawsuit? There is a rather large difference.
Also, the fact that you rely on some hack with 475 followers for your arguments is pitiful. My teen aged daughter has nearly 100,000 followers. I can get her to provide you with some hair brained political arguments, as well.
Judge Orders Sanctions Against Pro-Trump Lawyers Over Election Lawsuit
As part of the order for sanctions, the judge goes into detail about why the some of the all-important affidavits that people claim were never reviewed by the courts, were worthless. Looks like in fact they were reviewed and the lawyers couldn't answer basic questions about their relevance or how the law was violated. In fact, one affidavit is referred to as "a masterclass on making conjectural leaps and bounds."
Not that it matters but where are you coming up with 475 followers. That hack has 127k followers (not that it matters). The video compilation shows exactly what it shows and it doesn't matter who shares it. It simply speaks for itself.
As part of the order for sanctions, the judge goes into detail about why the some of the all-important affidavits that people claim were never reviewed by the courts, were worthless. Looks like in fact they were reviewed and the lawyers couldn't answer basic questions about their relevance or how the law was violated. In fact, one affidavit is referred to as "a masterclass on making conjectural leaps and bounds."
Really? You're looking forward to the report? Would have never thought so. It's not like you've embarrassed yourself for the past 3 months, helping to carry the water for team TrumpI make that assumption about you because you are basically discrediting Rumble and not acknowledging why it's being used by many people now. I am definitely looking forward to the report.
Really? You're looking forward to the report? Would have never thought so. It's not like you've embarrassed yourself for the past 3 months, helping to carry the water for team Trump
You should forward all your posts from this thread to the Donald. He might hire you as an advisor. You would fit right in with his team of highly qualified operatives
I'm not worried about the Donald. All I care about is exposing what happened so we can make the needed changes so it never happens again.
You maintain the default position of the election was fraudulent just like the cyber ninjas guy. Do you not understand why the report will be worthless? They have hired a guy who believes there was fraud and staffed his auditors with like minded people. They clearly do not understand election procedures and failed to follow their own procedures. This guy has been hired not to determine whether there were issues, but rather to find issues. My prediction is this report will give the Trump crowd talking points and "proof" but it will be completely discredited upon review by others. However, the Trump crowd will never remember or acknowledge that tidbit.
People have leapt to conclusions about how all the lawsuits were dismissed on technicalities and not on merits. I have seen some claim that any case dismissed on a Motion to Dismiss is not based evidence. Some of them were dismissed based upon a lack of evidence. That is not a technicality, but rather a failure of evidence.
It's not really an opinion.
This isn't an "audit"
Those releasing their findings are right wingers (and evidently ninjas)
We won't be at war
Nothing says a sitting president can't be removed
There is no basis to remove him because of the election anyways