Arizona Election Audit

#4,726
#4,726
Gandalf said:
Since I was PM to install similar voting machines and their entire process system for one of the largest cities in the US and managed Election Day operations for over 4 years I think that makes me a subject matter expert.

So when I give my opinion that there was clear evidence of substantial fraud (more than the usual retail kind, but have not yet seen definitive proof), I have a strong basis to make that statement.

You on the other hand… on what basis do you make yours?

Btw, if you didn’t understand my question, would you like me to dumb it down for you? :p
Click to expand...
So you’re one of the cheaters ….. hmm
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAFgolferVol
#4,727
#4,727
Gandalf said:
Since I was PM to install similar voting machines and their entire process system for one of the largest cities in the US and managed Election Day operations for over 4 years I think that makes me a subject matter expert.

So when I give my opinion that there was clear evidence of substantial fraud (more than the usual retail kind, but have not yet seen definitive proof), I have a strong basis to make that statement.

You on the other hand… on what basis do you make yours?

Btw, if you didn’t understand my question, would you like me to dumb it down for you? :p
Click to expand...
The original statement I incorrectly quoted said " significant".
 
#4,737
#4,737
ClearwaterVol said:
You maintain the default position of the election was fraudulent just like the cyber ninjas guy. Do you not understand why the report will be worthless? They have hired a guy who believes there was fraud and staffed his auditors with like minded people. They clearly do not understand election procedures and failed to follow their own procedures. This guy has been hired not to determine whether there were issues, but rather to find issues. My prediction is this report will give the Trump crowd talking points and "proof" but it will be completely discredited upon review by others. However, the Trump crowd will never remember or acknowledge that tidbit.
Click to expand...
That sounds about like any accusation lobbed at Trump during his 4 years. Pretty much everything was discredited but you still hear people to this day parroting those same lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT, AM64 and VolinWayne
#4,739
#4,739
Velo Vol said:
Reminder: "this is not about Trump"

Click to expand...

Pffft .... How could any reasonable person think there would be a conflict of interest involved with the losing candidate in an election, funding an audit of that same election?

This has not been a transparent audit. This has not been an independent audit. This has not even been an audit at all. This has been a Republican sham.
 
  • Like
Reactions: K-town Vol Fan, Septic and GritNGrind1906
#4,740
#4,740
Gandalf said:
While I am absolutely sure that there was significant cheating going on in this past election
Click to expand...
That must be what you want to believe, because no objective person arrives at a definitive conclusion of significant cheating, without some proof in support of it. Voter fraud, significant enough in nature to alter the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election, has not been proven despite intense scrutiny... but don't take my word for it. Noted liberal Democrat and anti-Trump activist, William Barr, said this:

"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election."

-- Former Attorney General, William Barr

... spoken during an interview with the Associated Press from December 1, 2020, following a DOJ investigation into claims of fraud.
 
#4,741
#4,741
Gandalf said:
Since I was PM to install similar voting machines and their entire process system for one of the largest cities in the US and managed Election Day operations for over 4 years I think that makes me a subject matter expert.

So when I give my opinion that there was clear evidence of substantial fraud (more than the usual retail kind, but have not yet seen definitive proof), I have a strong basis to make that statement.

You on the other hand… on what basis do you make yours?

Btw, if you didn’t understand my question, would you like me to dumb it down for you? :p
Click to expand...
There is no reason for anyone here to believe a word of this. You are not an expert on anything but delusions of grandeur. This ridiculous post of yours doesn't make you anything but a liar.
 
#4,742
#4,742
BowlBrother85 said:
There is no reason for anyone here to believe a word of this. You are not an expert on anything but delusions of grandeur. This ridiculous post of yours doesn't make you anything but a liar.
Click to expand...


What qualifies your opinion as an expert?? Do you know Gandolf personally and know that he's lying or is that just an easy way for you to discredit somebody by hiding behind your little keyboard and calling them a lyar. I personally am very impressed with your bravado.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT, AM64 and Carl Pickens
#4,743
#4,743
BowlBrother85 said:
Pffft .... How could any reasonable person think there would be a conflict of interest involved with the losing candidate in an election, funding an audit of that same election?

This has not been a transparent audit. This has not been an independent audit. This has not even been an audit at all. This has been a Republican sham.
Click to expand...


Your claim that this audit has not been transparent is laughable, a completely moronic statement and a blatant lie. This audit had absolutely every minute livestreamed and cameras were on the ballots every single minute that the ballots were in their hands. They also had a very stringent process for chain of custody. I assume your idea of transparency is pizza boxes stacked in front of windows!

Also, you are constantly trying to discredit the Ninjas because of their biased opinion that their was fraud. Yet you apparently have no issue at all with Eric Coomer, one of Dominions top executives openly showing his disdain and hatred for Trump. "Trump won't win, I mad ####ing sure of that". Keep in mind, this guy owns the patent for the adjudication system for the private company that basically runs our elections.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#4,744
#4,744
BowlBrother85 said:
Pffft .... How could any reasonable person think there would be a conflict of interest involved with the losing candidate in an election, funding an audit of that same election?

This has not been a transparent audit. This has not been an independent audit. This has not even been an audit at all. This has been a Republican sham.
Click to expand...
How can any reasonable person think there would not be a conflict of interest with those in charge of voting machines being a staunch supporter of one party? There’s always going to be bias BB. I’d think you’d want the losing party doing the audit because if they can’t find anything then it’s all good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Carl Pickens
#4,745
#4,745
VolinWayne said:
What qualifies your opinion as an expert?? Do you know Gandolf personally and know that he's lying or is that just an easy way for you to discredit somebody by hiding behind your little keyboard and calling them a lyar. I personally am very impressed with your bravado.
Click to expand...
I haven't claimed to be an expert (except on how to cook a steak on a gas grill), but I do know bull $hit when I smell it.
 
#4,746
#4,746
hUTch2002 said:
How can any reasonable person think there would not be a conflict of interest with those in charge of voting machines being a staunch supporter of one party? There’s always going to be bias BB. I’d think you’d want the losing party doing the audit because if they can’t find anything then it’s all good.
Click to expand...
That is not true.
 
#4,748
#4,748
VolinWayne said:
Your claim that this audit has not been transparent is laughable, a completely moronic statement and a blatant lie. This audit had absolutely every minute livestreamed and cameras were on the ballots every single minute that the ballots were in their hands. They also had a very stringent process for chain of custody. I assume your idea of transparency is pizza boxes stacked in front of windows!

Also, you are constantly trying to discredit the Ninjas because of their biased opinion that their was fraud. Yet you apparently have no issue at all with Eric Coomer, one of Dominions top executives openly showing his disdain and hatred for Trump. "Trump won't win, I mad ####ing sure of that". Keep in mind, this guy owns the patent for the adjudication system for the private company that basically runs our elections.
Click to expand...
You don't know what you are talking about.

Per azmirror.com, the Republican-controlled Arizona State Senate has filed multiple lawsuits to avoid complying with longstanding Arizona public records laws. Two weeks ago, the Arizona Court of Appeals rejected the Senate's arguments that it had no obligation to release records in the physical possession of the contractor known as Cyber Ninjas, by finding that those records "are no less public records simply because they are in the possession of a third party."

... and yet, Republicans in the Arizona Senate have still not complied with public record laws. That is being anything but transparent. You are paying attention to things of no consequence. The transparency of any audit of an election, hinges entirely on whether or not public record laws are being complied with .... and they're not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clarksvol00
#4,749
#4,749
BowlBrother85 said:
You don't know what you are talking about.

Per azmirror.com, the Republican-controlled Arizona State Senate has filed multiple lawsuits to avoid complying with longstanding Arizona public records laws. Two weeks ago, the Arizona Court of Appeals rejected the Senate's arguments that it had no obligation to release records in the physical possession of the contractor known as Cyber Ninjas, by finding that those records "are no less public records simply because they are in the possession of a third party."

... and yet, Republicans in the Arizona Senate have still not complied with public record laws. That is being anything but transparent. You are paying attention to things of no consequence. The transparency of any audit of an election, hinges entirely on whether or not public record laws are being complied with .... and they're not.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should also be concerned about Maricopa County complying with subpoenas. This thing works both ways.

I see you have no comment on Eric Coomer bias
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#4,750
#4,750
BowlBrother85 said:
That is not true.
Click to expand...
You don’t think those in charge of machines picked a side too? You act like CN are the only bias people in the world. Everyone is bias and right now people are more entrenched than ever in their bias. Take you for example. You are incapable of objectivity even though you don’t think that’s true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolinWayne
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top