Arizona Election Audit

#5,126
#5,126
Orangeburst said:
Propaganda arm of the Progressives. Russian agent LMAO, and you bit the worm so hard you cannot get the hook out of your mouth.
Just whataboutism in your face..Mr Whataboutism
Click to expand...

Speaking of whataboutism... this whole conversation started with criticism of the gateway pundit and nobody will defend it, but they sure have questions about CNN.

... because some people aren't that bright (they probably don't even know I'm referring to them), I'm definitely not defending CNN, I'm just questioning the Gateway Pundit's credibility.
 
#5,127
#5,127
BowlBrother85 said:
This isn't "what-about-ism".

The whole point of this discussion was :

"Who is worse CNN or The Gateway Pundit ?"

So, let's have that opinion on The Gateway Pundit then ....
Click to expand...

No opinion on them as I dont subscribe. I read some articles on them and know they are right wing biased, just as everyone does.
CNN on the other hand is one of the major TV outlets with exponential reach and spread far more manure just due to their size and story content, all while proclaiming they are objective. And they are not.

Now, you tell me which outlet is more impactful in their "lies"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DonjoVol and AM64
#5,129
#5,129
Orangeburst said:
No opinion on them as I dont subscribe. I read some articles on them and know they are right wing biased, just as everyone does.
CNN on the other hand is one of the major TV outlets with exponential reach and spread far more manure just due to their size and story content, all while proclaiming they are objective. And they are not.

Now, you tell me which outlet is more impactful in their "lies"?
Click to expand...
Ohhh... They're smaller and not as impactful... that excuses them. I'd bet the gateway pundit is probably quoted more than CNN on VNPF.
 
#5,130
#5,130
clarksvol00 said:
Ohhh... They're smaller and not as impactful... that excuses them. I'd bet the gateway pundit is probably quoted more than CNN on VNPF.
Click to expand...

Did I say that chief. The other poster had a right to bring up CNN and throw it in his face. The whole premise of removing a President because he is a Russian agent...lmao CNN and the worm biters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#5,132
#5,132
Orangeburst said:
Did I say that chief. The other poster had a right to bring up CNN and throw it in his face. The whole premise of removing a President because he is a Russian agent...lmao CNN and the worm biters.
Click to expand...
Why did you say it then chief?

Edit: if you want to say they're both FOS thats cool, but don't pretend like there's a reason one is better than the other.
 
#5,135
#5,135
Orangeburst said:
Huh? I made no excuses for GP as they are hardly on my radar.
Click to expand...
See my edit. I'm not sure why their viewership is worth mentioning other than minimizing the effects of the smaller outlet and maximizing the effects of the larger one. If they're both lying I'm not sure of any other difference between the two. I'd be glad to hear your thoughts otherwise.
 
#5,136
#5,136
BowlBrother85 said:
It's ridiculous to imply that the two are at all comparable.... and I don't mean that as a defense of CNN.
Click to expand...
I would not wipe my ass with the paper either printed.
I would independently verify twice anything either reported.
I could not care less which one was “the least ******”
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#5,141
#5,141
clarksvol00 said:
Liars are okay if nobody listens to them?
Click to expand...

Uhh.. from a macro stand point,, yea they are irrelevant or less relevant than a lying CNN.
The constant lies from the 4th Estate MSM during Trumps years where to set a narrative. GP might wanna be an estate but is only a farmhouse.
 
#5,142
#5,142
Orangeburst said:
Uhh.. from a macro stand point,, yea they are irrelevant or less relevant than a lying CNN.
The constant lies from the 4th Estate MSM during Trumps years where to set a narrative. GP might wanna be an estate but is only a farmhouse.
Click to expand...
Ok. If you don't see them as being as bad that's your opinion. My thought is that if you're willing to spew BS, you're willing to spew BS, and you have no more credibility than any other outfit that's willing to spew BS. So when somebody posts a gateway pundit, oan, or Jack posobiec declaration on VN PF, I shouldn't take any more stick in it than they would a huffington post article (not that I would trust a huffingto post article).
 
#5,143
#5,143
clarksvol00 said:
Ok. If you don't see them as being as bad that's your opinion. My thought is that if you're willing to spew BS, you're willing to spew BS, and you have no more credibility than any other outfit that's willing to spew BS. So when somebody posts a gateway pundit, oan, or Jack posobiec declaration on VN PF, I shouldn't take any more stick in it than they would a huffington post article (not that I would trust a huffingto post article).
Click to expand...

The way I look at it..not everything anyone of these orgs publish is a lie, so the perpetrators of corruption get away it as their ideological counterparts are already "labeled" as liars.
Just look at the MSM coverage of Trump to Biden...A respected media firm like the WaPo publishing a list of 20K lies by Trump, yet for Biden crickets. And has already had some whoppers and even published by MSM decades ago that he was a habitual liar. Or like Hunter's foreign shennanigans and how it might play into uncompromising our national security. I mean we could go on and on and on. And it is lying by omission as well. Media that is read by hundreds of millions, not thousands like GP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#5,144
#5,144
Orangeburst said:
The way I look at it..not everything anyone of these orgs publish is a lie, so the perpetrators of corruption get away it as their ideological counterparts are already "labeled" as liars.
Just look at the MSM coverage of Trump to Biden...A respected media firm like the WaPo publishing a list of 20K lies by Trump, yet for Biden crickets. And has already had some whoppers and even published by MSM decades ago that he was a habitual liar. Or like Hunter's foreign shennanigans and how it might play into uncompromising our national security. I mean we could go on and on and on. And it is lying by omission as well. Media that is read by hundreds of millions, not thousands like GP.
Click to expand...

I guess if you want to go on about the MSM but don't feel the Gateway Pundit needs to be questioned, that's your prerogative.
 
#5,145
#5,145
clarksvol00 said:
I guess if you want to go on about the MSM but don't feel the Gateway Pundit needs to be questioned, that's your prerogative.
Click to expand...

Question away. Like I said they are not relevant to me or 300M. That is not a defense of them.
Could you imagine that you would have to subsidize a lying network like CNN, or in this case, GP, with your cable bill? See it on TV's in a social setting or airport?
 
#5,146
#5,146
Orangeburst said:
Question away. Like I said they are not relevant to me or 300M. That is not a defense of them.
Could you imagine that you would have to subsidize a lying network like CNN, or in this case, GP, with your cable bill? See it on TV's in a social setting or airport?
Click to expand...
I'm sorry you've been subjected to CNN, hopefully nobody will be forced to pay for a cable package with CNN or OAN in the future.
 
#5,148
#5,148
luthervol said:
Gaslighting. We all knew Trump and the right were doing it.
We didn't think it would be so easily accomplished.
We have witnessed in real time the dumbing down of America.
It was a cornerstone of the Bannon/Stone/Trump strategy.
Click to expand...
this is rich….Who is we? Are you referring to the dolts and mindless sheep that voted for a demented, incompetent ass puppet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne and AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top