Arizona Election Audit

Oh are you getting offended that someone criticizes the network that is nothing but a mouthpiece for the democrat party? Let me guess. I bet you think Colbert, Kimmel, and The View are news as well.

CNN is complete garbage. And I'm not a Republican or democrat. I am smart enough to know when a news network is nothing but propaganda.

I don't much care for CNN. I don't much care for FOX either. But I will watch both on occassion, then argue with the TV like they can hear me, then turn them off a few minutes later. But both are significantly better sources of real news than The Gatewat Pundit. I mean some of they post is really out there and most of it with no supporting evidence whatsoever. And it is entirely, 100%, far right. They don't even feign trying to be neutral.
 
The Gateway Pundit exists because there are a whole lot of dummies out there that don't want the truth. They want something that verifies their unsupported crackpot opinions.

The issue is that people want so desperately to be right and the other side to be wrong, that they will believe anything that supports their narrative. I can't tell you how many people I grew up with that actually, truly believe Michele Obama is a dude and that basically any Dem you can name is involved in child sex trafficking ring and they order their kids from Wayfair and have group orgies at Epstein's island where they present these kids as human sacrifices to the devil. Oh, Bush is in on it too. Maybe even Mitt Romney.
 
Last edited:
“The upcoming Arizona State Senate hearing and decisions this Friday, 24 SEPT are monumental. The historic consequences cannot be understated. Below is a letter going to the President of the AZ Senate and all the Senators and citizens of Arizona. Our nation stands on the shoulders of heroes and this time, our time, is no different. Pray that courage and discernment are felt far and wide across Arizona and throughout the entire United States of America. God Bless"

General Flynn


Letter From 'The American People' To 'The Arizona Senate' Goes Viral Right Before AZ Audit Results Are Released
 
Woodward and Bernstein worked for the Washington Post. You're comparing that to the GP?

Nope. I'm saying Woodward and Bernstein took a story - at least part of a story, and without full context - and turned it into a scandal. My problem is not with reporting of fact; my problem is with reporting some fact with an agenda behind it. And my problem is with journalists believing that they, rather than elected officials, have the right to determine agendas and set policy. If "journalists" believe they are so damn capable and wish to set national policy, then let them run for office. Don't forget that in the last few years at least a couple of news anchors from the major networks got caught with expanding the "truth" and were suspended. Integrity in news doesn't always go with the name and size of the mouthpiece.
 
Nope. I'm saying Woodward and Bernstein took a story - at least part of a story, and without full context - and turned it into a scandal. My problem is not with reporting of fact; my problem is with reporting some fact with an agenda behind it. And my problem is with journalists believing that they, rather than elected officials, have the right to determine agendas and set policy. If "journalists" believe they are so damn capable and wish to set national policy, then let them run for office. Don't forget that in the last few years at least a couple of news anchors from the major networks got caught with expanding the "truth" and were suspended. Integrity in news doesn't always go with the name and size of the mouthpiece.
No, they didn't. Their initial reports in June of 1972 only concerned the break-in itself, at the DNC headquarters (Larry O'Brien's office to be exact) inside of the Watergate Hotel. Most major media outlets at the time covered the break-in. What made the reporting of Woodward and Bernstein exceptional, is that they were able to tie payments made to the Watergate burglars to Nixon's Committee to Re-elect the President (CREEP). This was accomplished over the course of a lengthy investigation... They weren't right every step of the way, but they weren't making hasty judgments either. Their conclusions were well-supported by evidence they were uncovering, with full context included.

The fact is, the Nixon administration turned it into a scandal much more significant than it needed to be, because of an inept cover-up attempt which involved the Attorney General, John Mitchell.
 
No, they didn't. Their initial reports in June of 1972 only concerned the break-in itself, at the DNC headquarters (Larry O'Brien's office to be exact) inside of the Watergate Hotel. Most major media outlets at the time covered the break-in. What made the reporting of Woodward and Bernstein exceptional, is that they were able to tie payments made to the Watergate burglars to Nixon's Committee to Re-elect the President (CREEP). This was accomplished over the course of a lengthy investigation... They weren't right every step of the way, but they weren't making hasty judgments either. Their conclusions were well-supported by evidence they were uncovering, with full context included.

The fact is, the Nixon administration turned it into a scandal much more significant than it needed to be, because of an inept cover-up attempt which involved the Attorney General, John Mitchell.

The rest of the story is that it was Nixon, and not that it was the same kind of crap widespread throughout politics. Of course, you believe the Russians sponsored Trump, so ... If you want to be honest then you report on all the dirty political laundry - all of it, or you simply report on other areas of life and ignore politics. But you don't report from a perspective reflecting your own political bias.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
The rest of the story is that it was Nixon, and not that it was the same kind of crap widespread throughout politics. Of course, you believe the Russians sponsored Trump, so ... If you want to be honest then you report on all the dirty political laundry - all of it, or you simply report on other areas of life and ignore politics. But you don't report from a perspective reflecting your own political bias.
A professional journalist should report on matters related to what is being investigated, and not provide commentary on the facts as they become established. Woodward and Bernstein didn't do that. The only person to blame for Nixon's downfall is Nixon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AshG
Leftist filth despise GP, OAN, and Newsmax because they expose what the MSM won’t.
Yep. You really have to admire The Gateway Pundit for exposing the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass shooting as a hoax. It's a travesty that they didn't receive a Pulitzer.
 
Yep. You really have to admire The Gateway Pundit for exposing the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass shooting as a hoax. It's a travesty that they didn't receive a Pulitzer.

The Biden thread is beckoning you. Main stream media basically colluded with a candidate when they chose to ignore the biden crimes and just simply outright lied and said the Hunter laptop did not exist and it was all fake news. This was all In the few weeks leading up to the election. It's both maddening as well as laughable that you continue to demonize any news source thats "right wing" when there has absolutely nothing but lies come out of the Communist News Network. You absolutely have no moral grounds to stand on and your argument has gotten pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrMet and Caculator
The Biden thread is beckoning you. Main stream media basically colluded with a candidate when they chose to ignore the biden crimes and just simply outright lied and said the Hunter laptop did not exist and it was all fake news. This was all In the few weeks leading up to the election. It's both maddening as well as laughable that you continue to demonize any news source thats "right wing" when there has absolutely nothing but lies come out of the Communist News Network. You absolutely have no moral grounds to stand on and your argument has gotten pathetic.
For the record, I don't "demonize any news source that's right wing." I demonize outlets which promote conspiracy theories, hoaxes and outright lies as "The Gateway Pundit" consistently has. It is purely a fake news site.

Can you find any posts of mine that have ever been critical of "The Washington Times", "The Federalist" or "National Review" ? No, you can't... because I haven't been. Even when I'm critical of "Fox News", I mention specific hosts, rather than painting everyone with the same brush. I criticize Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson, but not Brett Baier and John Roberts.

It is pathetic that you post links to "The Gateway Pundit", and that you obviously consider them to be a legitimate source of news. That site should insult the intelligence of a 9 year old... but since you are still the intellectual equivalent of a 6 year old... I guess you may never reach that point.
 
Last edited:
Friday afternoon release? That's when you release things that you are trying to bury.
I guess they want a couple of days to try and give it the right wing slant before it is torn apart by legitimate sources.

It's so legitimate, they have to use a fringe chat program to get the word out. They may as well use VolNation Politics for their official release location. Might even get more notice.
 
Friday afternoon release? That's when you release things that you are trying to bury.
I guess they want a couple of days to try and give it the right wing slant before it is torn apart by legitimate sources.
That is what I was thinking. This has the appearance of a Friday afternoon news dump. You can tell the "Cyber Ninjas" aren't looking forward to having their "findings" subjected to an intense degree of thorough and meticulous scrutiny.

... but hey, at least they finally finished!
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
The Biden thread is beckoning you. Main stream media basically colluded with a candidate when they chose to ignore the biden crimes and just simply outright lied and said the Hunter laptop did not exist and it was all fake news. This was all In the few weeks leading up to the election. It's both maddening as well as laughable that you continue to demonize any news source thats "right wing" when there has absolutely nothing but lies come out of the Communist News Network. You absolutely have no moral grounds to stand on and your argument has gotten pathetic.
Let's not forget the credible allegations against Joe Biden by Tara Reade. Completely blew it off or acted like there was nothing to see. It was so bad that it even woke up Rose McGowan to who the democrats really are.

Yet when it came to the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh we heard non stop of how the allegations against him were credible and needed to be investigated. Even stooped so low to question beer drinking and his high school yearbook of all things.
 
Let's not forget the credible allegations against Joe Biden by Tara Reade. Completely blew it off or acted like there was nothing to see. It was so bad that it even woke up Rose McGowan to who the democrats really are.

Yet when it came to the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh we heard non stop of how the allegations against him were credible and needed to be investigated. Even stooped so low to question beer drinking and his high school yearbook of all things.
@VolinWayne, @DonjoVol, CNN is trash. What are your thoughts on Gateway Pundit's credibility given the fact that the Pundit's credibility started the recent media discussion in this thread? I've been told the Pundit isn't as bad because it has fewer followers, but is there a reason it is more or less credible than "MSM?" If I've stated CNN is trash, can we leave the liberal networks out of this and discuss the merits of the pundit?

@Orangeslice13, better?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
@VolinWayne, @DonjoVol, CNN is trash. What are your thoughts on Gateway Pundit's credibility given the fact that the Pundit's credibility started the recent media discussion in this thread? I've been told the Pundit isn't as bad because it has fewer followers, but is there a reason it is more or less credible than "MSM?" If I've stated CNN is trash, can we leave the liberal networks out of this and discuss the merits of the pundit?

@Orangeslice13, better?
They won't respond to this, or try to defend "The Gateway Pundit" as a legitimate journalistic enterprise. The more you talk about "The Gateway Pundit", the more that just prompts them to talk about CNN.

Like I said in an above post... The content published by The Gateway Pundit should insult the intelligence of the average 9 year old... and yet their crazy junk is linked here all the time. The Republican Party has become a cult of gullible kooks and crackpots.
 
They won't respond to this, or try to defend "The Gateway Pundit" as a legitimate journalistic enterprise. The more you talk about "The Gateway Pundit", the more that just prompts them to talk about CNN.

Like I said in an above post... The content published by The Gateway Pundit should insult the intelligence of the average 9 year old... and yet their crazy junk is linked here all the time. The Republican Party has become a cult of gullible kooks and crackpots.
And CNN's junk is shared all over social media. Along with other sites like Mother Jones. Have you seen the Occupy Democrats Facebook page? Filled completely with falsehoods, conspiracies, and hate. Have you seen the Palmer Report lately? Buzzfeed? And yet you make the claim the Republican party is a cult of gullible kooks and crackpots. Yet you say nothing about the numerous sites out there that democrats follow and share and believe whatever is put out on those sites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
@VolinWayne, @DonjoVol, CNN is trash. What are your thoughts on Gateway Pundit's credibility given the fact that the Pundit's credibility started the recent media discussion in this thread? I've been told the Pundit isn't as bad because it has fewer followers, but is there a reason it is more or less credible than "MSM?" If I've stated CNN is trash, can we leave the liberal networks out of this and discuss the merits of the pundit?

@Orangeslice13, better?
Perfect
 
They won't respond to this, or try to defend "The Gateway Pundit" as a legitimate journalistic enterprise. The more you talk about "The Gateway Pundit", the more that just prompts them to talk about CNN.

Like I said in an above post... The content published by The Gateway Pundit should insult the intelligence of the average 9 year old... and yet their crazy junk is linked here all the time. The Republican Party has become a cult of gullible kooks and crackpots.
Now you’re bringing it up for them.
If you want to have the conversation about one without the other then stipulate the the other is also Trash and move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
And CNN's junk is shared all over social media. Along with other sites like Mother Jones. Have you seen the Occupy Democrats Facebook page? Filled completely with falsehoods, conspiracies, and hate. Have you seen the Palmer Report lately? Buzzfeed? And yet you make the claim the Republican party is a cult of gullible kooks and crackpots. Yet you say nothing about the numerous sites out there that democrats follow and share and believe whatever is put out on those sites.
Agreed.
The left “news” sources you’ve sited are nothing more than the National enquirer. They’re straight garbage.
How does that in any way change the fact that gateway pundit is absolutely right spin? It’s the equivalent of the National enquirer and straight trash. It has very little to do with factual news. Do you dispute these statements?
 
@VolinWayne, @DonjoVol, CNN is trash. What are your thoughts on Gateway Pundit's credibility given the fact that the Pundit's credibility started the recent media discussion in this thread? I've been told the Pundit isn't as bad because it has fewer followers, but is there a reason it is more or less credible than "MSM?" If I've stated CNN is trash, can we leave the liberal networks out of this and discuss the merits of the pundit?

@Orangeslice13, better?


I'm not sure why you keep asking for my opinion when we all know you despise every opinion that I have. With that being said, here is my opinion.

I believe the Gateway Pundit is quite simply the polar opposite of the majority of other news sources. Everything they report is catered to the right. It's entire existence is built on reporting the things that the left and mainstream simply refuses to report. Do they get everything right? Of course not. Then again, how many news sources do in this day and time.

Take for example all of the Biden family crimes and Hunters laptop. Mainstream media simply refused to cover this when it came out in the weeks leading up to the election. They straight up lied and said the was all a conspiracy theory. The Gateway Pundit covered this and we see today that the majority of what they said was actually true. That was a major news story that absolutely should have been covered by every news source in the weeks leading up to the election. Mainstream media all colluded with each other and with Big Tech and called this fake news. Not that it even matters but how many voters who voted for Biden would have voted differently if this had been reported and they would have known the truth?

The left peddled a completely fabricated lie for 3 years about Trump and Russia. This was all a lie and a completely made up story that ended up costing tax payers millions of dollars. All of this garbage has been proven false. The Gateway Pundit got this story right as well. I wonder how many more "conspiracy theories" will be proven correct in the end.

The Gateway Pundit was also one of the first to report that Covid originated from the Wuhan Lab. At the time, this was labeled a conspiracy theory. We all now know this to be an undeniable fact.

They Gateway Pundit was one of the first to expose the FBIs involvement in the conspiracy to kidnap Gov. Whitmer. They claimed that the FBI was heavily involved in pushing these guys to do what they did. It has now been proven that at least half of the guys who were involved in this plot were actually guys from the FBI or FBI informants.

They also report a lot on the evidence that continues to come up on what went wrong with the stolen election. There is a very large percentage of Americans like myself who honestly believe the election was stolen. There is a ton of evidence out there to back up these opinions. Once again, mainstream media just simply refuses to cover this and have colluded with big tech to suppress every claim of fraud. Thousands of sworn affidavits but all these people are just simply conspiracy theorists.

I could go on and on with the stories that the Gateway Pundit came out with that were immediately labeled conspiracy theory but later it was proven true. Once again, do they get everything right? Absolutely no they don't. Sadly, Not many news sources do nowdays. Does this mean you just simply dismiss everythjng they put out simply because it is the Gateway Pundit? I don't think so. And yes, their news is always slanted right.
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top