Arizona Election Audit

#5,329
#5,329
VolinWayne said:
I just hope and pray it's presented in a way that it is undeniable proof that there either was or there was not fraud. We don't need anything in the middle. All we want is the truth.
Click to expand...

You could have this and some will never believe that there was fraud. Examples are those in this thread. Just like you suspected, there was fraud in AZ. Take that and hope the AZ legislature will do the right thing. Disregard those that will never admit fraud no matter how much evidence is thrown in their faces.
 
#5,331
#5,331
clarksvol00 said:
I dont believe or disbelieve the cyber ninjas count. I do believe if the ninjas could have found a way to say Biden lost, they would have.
Click to expand...
That’s not a conclusion that can be made by this audit. The EC is not required to vote for the popular vote winner.
The only conclusion is fraud/no fraud or how much fraud. Outcome of the general was never in play regardless of whoever wanted to frame it that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and whodeycin85
#5,333
#5,333
VolinWayne said:
This is my view. Everybody needs to cool their jets and wait until the entire report comes out. There have been so few leaks throughout this process It almost feels like this was done intentionally for some reason. Was this leak just the bait to get all of mainstream media to be covering this today?? Like Tnmarktx said, there's plenty of fraud right there in the report that mainstream conveniently is just ignoring. Either way, I'm going to wait and see what the final report has to offer. I just hope and pray it's presented in a way that it is undeniable proof that there either was or there was not fraud. We don't need anything in the middle. All we want is the truth.
Click to expand...
Exactly. I watched the state legislature hearings a LONG time ago. There was enough evidence presented at the time to swing several states back to Trump. No one on the Republican side had the testicular fortitude to do anything about it and the MSM lefties wrote it all off.

Speaking of Republicans, this entire process has demonstrated that a high percentage of the R's in DC are nothing more than spineless weaklings and swamp dwellers that need to be voted out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolinWayne
#5,334
#5,334
Orangeslice13 said:
That’s not a conclusion that can be made by this audit. The EC is not required to vote for the popular vote winner.
The only conclusion is fraud/no fraud or how much fraud. Outcome of the general was never in play regardless of whoever wanted to frame it that way.
Click to expand...
Maybe I worded it poorly. I in no way meant to imply the election result could be changed.
 
#5,337
#5,337
Conspiracy theory alert... It just occurred to me and the timing of the demand and acquiescence for the Texas audit is perfect.The end game of this whole thing is to get red state legislatures in states that might go blue in a presidential election to pass changes to election laws. It won't surprise me in the least if states like AZ start passing laws that allow the legislature to appoint their own electors upon a vote of a majority of the state house that there were "abnormalities" in the local election counts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AshG and Dergibvol
#5,344
#5,344
clarksvol00 said:
Conspiracy theory alert... It just occurred to me and the timing of the demand and acquiescence for the Texas audit is perfect.The end game of this whole thing is to get red state legislatures in states that might go blue in a presidential election to pass changes to election laws. It won't surprise me in the least if states like AZ start passing laws that allow the legislature to appoint their own electors upon a vote of a majority of the state house that there were "abnormalities" in the local election counts.
Click to expand...

Want to bet that Bannon, Miller, and Stone are helping with this on the back end?
 
#5,345
#5,345
clarksvol00 said:
Conspiracy theory alert... It just occurred to me and the timing of the demand and acquiescence for the Texas audit is perfect.The end game of this whole thing is to get red state legislatures in states that might go blue in a presidential election to pass changes to election laws. It won't surprise me in the least if states like AZ start passing laws that allow the legislature to appoint their own electors upon a vote of a majority of the state house that there were "abnormalities" in the local election counts.
Click to expand...
If the state goes blue how would that not help the Democrats who would then be Charge?

Or is this like when the Democrats changed the rules on Supreme Court nomination and Mitch warned them that he was going to use that change to break one off in them if he got the chance?
Which he later did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and StarRaider
#5,346
#5,346
Orangeslice13 said:
If the state goes blue how would that not help the Democrats who would then be Charge?

Or is this like when the Democrats changed the rules on Supreme Court nomination and Mitch warned them that he was going to use that change to break one off in them if he got the chance?
Which he later did.
Click to expand...
Im talking about a scenario like AZ or Georgia in 2020. Republicans control state legislature, but the population voted for a democratic presidential candidate.
 
#5,347
#5,347
clarksvol00 said:
Im talking about a scenario like AZ or Georgia in 2020. Republicans control state legislature, but the population voted for a democratic presidential candidate.
Click to expand...
I’m just saying that type of behavior is very short sighted and they should learn from the Democrats previous mistakes

I believe it’s very unlikely.
And the Georgia rules expands voting. Unless you believe hackery spin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrMet
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top