Arizona Election Audit

I find the most hilarious aspect of this whole process to be that the Republican controlled AZ Senate tried to precook the process and they still lost. They bring in a company to do the audit that has never done a review of an election and whose CEO/Founder previously said that there was no doubt systemic fraud had occurred. Hmmm, wonder why they chose Cyber Ninjas.

It's come out that much of it is being paid for by the extreme crazies, including two hosts for OAN. Is that what Republicans want?

Then they show how crazy they are by doing things like checking ballots to see if there was bamboo in the paper, which under their logic would prove China was involved, and that's not even addressing the racism of that action.

And to further establish their technical expertise, Cyber Ninjas and the Republican leader of the AZ Senate try to say that Maricopa County held back information only to be shown that the Ninjas had it all along.

Oh and let's not forget chain of custody issues where Cyber Ninjas had to move records between facilities and so corrupted the voting machines that Maricopa County will have to spend millions of dollars to replace them because they can no longer be certified for use.

And despite their efforts to cook the books and the activities of their CEO, even Cyber Ninjas found there was no basis for the claims.

You can't make this stuff up, but that doesn't mean the RWNs (right wing nuts) won't keep trying.
 
Bad interpretation?

You can think I'm wrong but you're calling me a hypocrite. It's become clear that you don't know what a hypocrite is or how it's different from thinking someone is wrong.

These terms aren't synonymous. You're going to need to get better at this if you intend to be taken seriously.

Ideally, you'd come away with this with a fresh understanding that accusing someone of not being able to interpret context or have reading comprehension issues, while you yourself are doing the same has a specific term associated with it. I'll let you figure that out.
Bro. I never called you a hypocrite. I called your post hypocritical. Calling an action hypocritical is not calling the person a hypocrite. How fkn ignorant can someone be? It’s really not that hard to understand. Fascinating
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
That’s what I keep saying. TulsiG would win in a landslide
She’s one of the few who seems to be able to govern across the isle.
I mean tulsi was clearly the best candidate and it wasn’t even remotely close. But since she exposed queen Kamala and wouldn’t bow down to the DNC overlords, she got shunned. So wild
 
Bro. I never called you a hypocrite. I called your post hypocritical. Calling an action hypocritical is not calling the person a hypocrite. How fkn ignorant can someone be? It’s really not that hard to understand. Fascinating

You should stop.

If you state someone is being hypocritical, by default you're implying that person is a hypocrite.

I suppose I shouldn't expect you to reconcile that since you were using it in a scenario in which it didn't apply in the first place.

Keep digging though...

Bro.
 
You should stop.

If you state someone is being hypocritical, by default you're implying that person is a hypocrite.

I suppose I shouldn't expect you to reconcile that since you were using it in a scenario in which it didn't apply in the first place.

Keep digging though...

Bro.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
I mean tulsi was clearly the best candidate and it wasn’t even remotely close. But since she exposed queen Kamala and wouldn’t bow down to the DNC overlords, she got shunned. So wild
Could you imagine DeSantis running with Gabbard as his VP. The left and democrats would go insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrMet
I mean tulsi was clearly the best candidate and it wasn’t even remotely close. But since she exposed queen Kamala and wouldn’t bow down to the DNC overlords, she got shunned. So wild
Well the repubs picked the absolute worst (by a mile) candidate in the 2016 primaries. All of the other were far better.
I'm still convinced many Trumpers loved Trump because he was so hated by the majority.
 
I wonder how they will reconcile the 17k duplicate ballots found??? Its up to AZ now
If a voter sends back a mail-in ballot and the signature on the envelope is questioned, or there is no signature, election officials will work to cure that signature by contacting the voter. If the issue is fixed by the voter, the envelope will be scanned a second time, resulting in more than one image of the same envelope. Although the envelope is scanned again, it is not opened until a valid signature is provided, meaning that only one ballot or vote is counted, according to election officials in Maricopa County.
 
Well the repubs picked the absolute worst (by a mile) candidate in the 2016 primaries. All of the other were far better.
I'm still convinced many Trumpers loved Trump because he was so hated by the majority.
PSA: There are ballgames on today, luther.
 
How many posts?
I had one this morning about 12:45 after getting in at 12:30 from our away football game. Had two this morning, around 8:30.
Spent the next 5 hours with about 40 students, teachers, coaches, and administrators painting, landscaping and doing repair work for an ailing elderly couple with a past connection to a local school.
I've had four posts since getting pack home.
Thanks for looking out for me.......much needed.
 
Bro. I never called you a hypocrite. I called your post hypocritical. Calling an action hypocritical is not calling the person a hypocrite. How fkn ignorant can someone be? It’s really not that hard to understand. Fascinating

They are Playing the "Victim" Card.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrMet

VN Store



Back
Top