Arizona Election Audit

[tnmarktx]

If I'm not mistaken.. if fraud is proven. Does that not nullify the election anyways?

I don't think nothing can be done about the election. They could decertify, but wouldn't change the election.

 

[Septic]

If I'm not mistaken.. if fraud is proven. Does that not nullify the election anyways?

LOL

How you guys going to prove anything when your bought and paid for auditors can't even find the fraud?

 

[Septic]

They are Playing the "Victim" Card.

Please elaborate.

 

[Septic]

From... The hill. Which is basically a left leaning publisher. Might as well be CNN.

The Hill Media Bias Rating

Any other nuggets?

 

[TNVOLNAVY]

 

[BowlBrother85]

The problem with this is, the Cyber Ninjas audit report of Maricopa County, which was referenced in this memo, didn't provide a clear indication of "a corrupted 2020 election", as these Republicans in the Arizona State Legislature are strongly suggesting that it did.

This memo is an example of gaslighting.

These Republican members of the Arizona State Legislature want to convince their constituents that something has been factually established, which doesn't even exist at all (undeniable proof of widespread voter fraud, which altered the outcome of the 2020 Presidential General Election).

These Arizona Republicans know they look bad for commissioning an unnecessary 5 month-long audit, and so they have now shifted to damage control mode. This memo is a pathetic display of it.

... and why didn't the Republican President of the Arizona State Senate, Karen Fann, sign this memo? Her name is conspicuous by its absence. After all, she was responsible for hand-picking the "Cyber Ninjas", a little-known firm from across the country (Florida), with no prior experience of working on an election.

 

[BowlBrother85]

I don't think nothing can be done about the election. They could decertify, but wouldn't change the election.

Whoever said that Trump supporters were inarticulate simpletons has clearly never logged onto the politics forum of VolNation. Our faction of Trumpets is comprised of nothing but intellectual wordsmiths.

 

[TNJOKER]

The Hill Media Bias Rating

Any other nuggets?

Yes. They are left leaning in my book.

 

[TNJOKER]

Please elaborate.

And I quote

"You can think I'm wrong but you're calling me a hypocrite. It's become clear that you don't know what a hypocrite is or how it's different from thinking someone is wrong."

The guy wasn't even remotely calling you a hypocrite. Yet you assumed he was a hypocrite by default.

 

[TNJOKER]

I don't think nothing can be done about the election. They could decertify, but wouldn't change the election.

It'll be alright.

 

[lawgator1]

Odd that every time this claim is made and is examined in any depth it completely falls apart.

 

[whodeycin85]

Lets look at this another way....say the NCAA was auditing KY basketball before player endorsements were allowed...thr auditors found 17k payments made...they got a court-ordered for the cpu and routers that show the proof..after 3 months KY hand them over only to find those files deleted. And the person who deleted the files was on camera doing so,l....Would you think they were paying thier players?

 

[Septic]

Yes. They are left leaning in my book.

LOL Well your personal anecdote is wrong, objectively.

 

[Septic]

And I quote

"You can think I'm wrong but you're calling me a hypocrite. It's become clear that you don't know what a hypocrite is or how it's different from thinking someone is wrong."

The guy wasn't even remotely calling you a hypocrite. Yet you assumed he was a hypocrite by default.

That's not being a victim, you dolt. It's an explanation of why he was using the term wrong.

Not only did he imply I was being a hypocrite (by literally calling me hypocritical), he applied in a context in which its usage was incorrect.

You two are the double threat of double threat of dumb.

 

[TNJOKER]

That's not being a victim, you dolt. It's an explanation of why he was using the term wrong.

Not only did he imply I was being a hypocrite (by literally calling me hypocritical), he applied in a context in which its usage was incorrect.

You two are the double threat of double threat of dumb.

Nope.

You can state the implication of something from your take. But from another individuals take there was no implications meant towards you ( See the posters reply) Hence why I stated you played the victim card.

From your point of view there was some sort of supposed implication of you being called a Hypocrite. My point of view after reading the point of view from the OP, No ill will was meant towards you.

 

[DonjoVol]

From... The hill. Which is basically a left leaning publisher. Might as well be CNN.

The Hill isn't quite as bad as CNN. CNN is by far the absolute worst that's out there. TYT a close second. Mother Jones is even better than them.

 

[BreatheUT]

Whoever said that Trump supporters were inarticulate simpletons has clearly never logged onto the politics forum of VolNation. Our faction of Trumpets is comprised of nothing but intellectual wordsmiths.

Whoever said Biden voters are the biggest plagarists clearly hasn't logged on to VolNations. The leftist limpdick anti-Trumper puppets are some of the biggest google plagarists in the Western Hemisphere.

 

[MercyPercy]

So is the storm coming or nah

 

[clarksvol00]

Whoever said Biden voters are the biggest plagarists clearly hasn't logged on to VolNations. The leftist limpdick anti-Trumper puppets are some of the biggest google plagarists in the Western Hemisphere.

Harsh. You been drinking already?

 

[WBO]

I wonder how they will reconcile the 17k duplicate ballots found??? Its up to AZ now

That's another RWN lie. So sad.

 

[BreatheUT]

Harsh. You been drinking already?

Yeah, you're right. Probably a bit much. Just a snide remark replying to a snide remark.

 

[WBO]

From... The hill. Which is basically a left leaning publisher. Might as well be CNN.

The Hill is a right wing publisher? Are you serious? It prints commentary as well as news stories and from what I've see they have a number of conservative writers they publish, for instance R. Lowry. The bottom line is you conservatives won't accept anything that doesn't conform to your viewpoint because you don't care about the truth. That's how we ended up with Trump.

 

[DonjoVol]

The Hill is a right wing publisher? Are you serious? It prints commentary as well as news stories and from what I've see they have a number of conservative writers they publish, for instance R. Lowry. The bottom line is you conservatives won't accept anything that doesn't conform to your viewpoint because you don't care about the truth. That's how we ended up with Trump.

And since when do leftists and democrats accept anything that doesn't conform to their viewpoints? Even when some of the stories that have been reported, and that they believe, have proven to be false.

 

[AshG]

Yes. They are left leaning in my book.

In what way are they left leaning to you?

 

[DonjoVol]

In what way are they left leaning to you?

Okay. How about going to their website now and provide links to articles showing coverage favorable to Republicans or an article about legislation that Republicans are proposing?

Can you actually prove they are not left leaning?