Arizona Election Audit

#2,080
#2,080
RockyTop85 said:
Except you’re raising issues with the prior counterintelligence investigation that don’t do anything to undermine the objective facts that were known by Rosenstein when he appointed Mueller. So all of the “support” you’ve just given for your conclusion can be true and there can still be a basis for the appointment of a special counsel and a full investigation.

The known objective facts did create a basis to appoint a special counsel. That basis is mostly publicly known. It has been known for years. It’s not hard to find out what it was.

Sure, I could go to all the trouble of attempting to cut through the endless, well-rehearsed ejaculation of chaff with links to things like Rod Rosenstein’s congressional testimony where he said that the appointment of a special counsel was justified and that he would do it again, or a list of the facts that make him correct. But under these conditions, given the publicity and the amount of time the information has been available, not knowing any better and being a crank who has to eschew reality to try to reframe an opinion as an objective fact are pretty equally discrediting. So nothing else really needs to be said.
Click to expand...
You mean that finger pointing exercise back in June 2020? Why was there a need to point fingers? It’s because of all the lies and “errors” that had occurred which created a nice buffer for Rosenstein and he took full advantage of it. At the same time of course he said it wasn’t corrupt but there’s plenty of evidence out there to suggest otherwise, y out just choose to ignore it. Carry on in your selective blissful ignorance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#2,081
#2,081
Sandman 423 said:
Are we as a society so lazy that we have to use a multiple guess computer program to vote. Why not just use a paper ballet so that you have a tangible trail?
Click to expand...

paper? you are the lazy one!!

we should etch our choice in stone. Only then would our vote be properly secure
 
#2,082
#2,082
Tastylicks said:
Caitlyn Jenner said she/he sat last election out too. She/he said it was because as a Republican in California her vote didn't matter.
They asked her if voting doesn't matter then why should people vote for her for governor? And she/he said "because I'm cute."
-

I like her future in the Republican Party. Rising star no doubt.

Also, they checked and Caitlyn Jenner DID in fact vote, so the whole conversation was a lie!!! Even more reason why she's the perfect candidate for the latest version of the Trump/Republican Party
Click to expand...

Why do you keep referring to Jenner ad she?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT and AM64
#2,083
#2,083
Orangeburst said:
I am Reaganite..Trust but verify.
What in hell is the problem with a full blown audit? Sure, I get it, attack the auditors, but I dont trust anything without verification, unlike yourself who spouts "anonymous sources" from the WaPo and NYT. You thrived on that **** for 5 years, and still do.
Click to expand...
I doubt you were for any of the audits on Trump.
 
#2,085
#2,085
Tastylicks said:
paper? you are the lazy one!!

we should etch our choice in stone. Only then would our vote be properly secure
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
#2,089
#2,089
VolinWayne said:
In 2018 Democrats were sounding the alarm on voting machines and Republicans remained silent. I think there are lots of politicians on both sides of the aisle that have been corrupted and no longer are there to represent us. It's just a dog and pony show.. This is a bipartisan problem that needs to be fixed asap


Click to expand...

When the issue comes up every four years or so, one side of a roughly 50/50 split loses interest in looking into voting fraud ... for obvious reasons. For that reason alone, it's unlikely that we'll ever fix the mess much less actually look into it.
 
#2,093
#2,093
VolinWayne said:
What is telling about this statement? I'm not following you.
"This is no different than an audit making sure best practices are being followed".
Click to expand...
Cause it went from searching for fraud to simply checking for best practice. There could be any number of things done that arent considered best practice that combined wouldnt come close to actual fraud.

This is moving goalposts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#2,095
#2,095
VolinWayne said:
Click to expand...


Maricopa County elected officials must be thinking this bad look (attempting to end an investigation) is better than what remains to be found. Seems like just a few years ago there was an uproar about a person in authority possibly demanding an end to an investigation about him; funny how there are apparently different standards for different people.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne, Orangeburst and TNVOLNAVY
#2,099
#2,099
NCFisher said:
Because it’s you disagreeing with my assertion that a special counsel was not needed.
So, what rationale provides the basis for a special counsel investigation on any of the four initial targets that Rosenstein specified in his appointment memo?
Click to expand...

I should jump through hoops for somebody who is already misrepresenting my comments because he erroneously claims he said it first?

That doesn’t sound like a very good reason.

The facts are out there. If you wanted to be informed about what they were, you could be. You don’t want to be, which is why you’re dancing around them with all of this stuff about the counter intelligence investigation.
 
#2,100
#2,100
hUTch2002 said:
You mean that finger pointing exercise back in June 2020? Why was there a need to point fingers? It’s because of all the lies and “errors” that had occurred which created a nice buffer for Rosenstein and he took full advantage of it. At the same time of course he said it wasn’t corrupt but there’s plenty of evidence out there to suggest otherwise, y out just choose to ignore it. Carry on in your selective blissful ignorance.
Click to expand...
Other dude brought up Rosenstein, I just pointed out that he said the opposite of what was attributed to him. Of course then he just made up more stuff about what he said, so it didn’t do much good.

The idea that the appointment wasn’t justified is just factually wrong. I’m not always sure if that comes from a deep seated partisan dishonesty or ignorance, but it amounts to the same thing.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top