Arizona Election Audit

#2,101
#2,101
RockyTop85 said:
Other dude brought up Rosenstein, I just pointed out that he said the opposite of what was attributed to him. Of course then he just made up more stuff about what he said, so it didn’t do much good.

The idea that the appointment wasn’t justified is just factually wrong. I’m not always sure if that comes from a deep seated partisan dishonesty or ignorance, but it amounts to the same thing.
Click to expand...
So the Politco article I read saying that Rosenstein was blaming the FBI was due to Politco being some kind of right wing partisan piece? Is that what you’re insinuating?
 
#2,102
#2,102
hUTch2002 said:
So the Politco article I read saying that Rosenstein was blaming the FBI was due to Politco being some kind of right wing partisan piece? Is that what you’re insinuating?
Click to expand...
I don’t care what politico says, or why. I know what Rosenstein said. He did not say he “would NOT have authorized those investigations if the facts had been truthfully presented by the FBI?”

He acknowledged the problems with the FBI investigation and said the appointment was still justified.
 
#2,103
#2,103
MurphyVol said:
At least she's been steady and consistent all this time and clearly a woman of conviction that is in no way opportunistic

"I think he has been insulting to women,"

"Donald Trump's inappropriate, offensive comments are just wrong - No matter when he said them or whatever the context,"

"And I associate myself with Speaker (Paul) Ryan's comment just saying there is no place for what Trump said about Muslims in this country."

"I think there is no excuse to be attacking Gold Star families,"

“I am concerned about some of the contacts between Russians and surrogates within the Trump Organization and the Trump campaign.”
Click to expand...
I know this is a crazy thought but maybe, just maybe, she believes fraud occurs but also has criticisms of Trump. Mind blown!
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
#2,105
#2,105
RockyTop85 said:
I don’t care what politico says, or why. I know what Rosenstein said. He did not say he “would NOT have authorized those investigations if the facts had been truthfully presented by the FBI?”

He acknowledged the problems with the FBI investigation and said the appointment was still justified.
Click to expand...
Ah, ok so now you’re getting more specific. He did say that, I agree. That doesn’t mean he was right. Of course he’s going to defend his own appointment decision. To think he would say otherwise is silly. Even if the appointment was legitimate, why did it go on for so long when they knew there was nothing there? It was all about damaging Trump for the election. I mean I’m sure they hoped they would find something they could use to get him out sooner but I believe they also knew it was unlikely. Good thing for Dems that COVID came along. Otherwise, we would still have Trump. What’s funny is if you polled Dems and they honestly answered which would they rather have, the current situation or no COVID but Trump is re-elected, I have no doubt that most would take the current situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#2,106
#2,106
hUTch2002 said:
Ah, ok so now you’re getting more specific. He did say that, I agree. That doesn’t mean he was right. Of course he’s going to defend his own appointment decision. To think he would say otherwise is silly. Even if the appointment was legitimate, why did it go on for so long when they knew there was nothing there? It was all about damaging Trump for the election. I mean I’m sure they hoped they would find something they could use to get him out sooner but I believe they also knew it was unlikely. Good thing for Dems that COVID came along. Otherwise, we would still have Trump. What’s funny is if you polled Dems and they honestly answered which would they rather have, the current situation or no COVID but Trump is re-elected, I have no doubt that most would take the current situation.
Click to expand...

No, him saying it doesn’t mean he was right. The known facts mean he was right.
 
#2,107
#2,107
VolinWayne said:
What is telling about this statement? I'm not following you.
"This is no different than an audit making sure best practices are being followed".
Click to expand...
It tells that he must watch a lot of CNN because that’s the same BS they pulled to conjure most of Trump’s “lies” and sound bites they used to try and tear him down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#2,109
#2,109
hUTch2002 said:
You meant the version of facts fed to you. Got it. Glad we agree.
Click to expand...
No. The facts that are known to be true. There is no “version” of these facts, or I would be happy to debate your made up “versions” with you.

The facts are known. Have been known for four years. It’s shameful to pretend like there were no facts to support an investigation which is probably part of why Rosenstein won’t do it.
 
#2,111
#2,111
RockyTop85 said:
No. The facts that are known to be true. There is no “version” of these facts, or I would be happy to debate your made up “versions” with you.

The facts are known. Have been known for four years. It’s shameful to pretend like there were no facts to support an investigation which is probably part of why Rosenstein won’t do it.
Click to expand...
There were manufactured facts between Strzok, Steele, Comey and others that set up Papadopoulus. They set it up well but it was indeed a set up. That’s the fact of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Orangeburst
#2,112
#2,112
evillawyer said:
This you @NorthDallas40 ?

Click to expand...

Could be a cousin will have to check and see if we have anybody in AZ but I don’t think so. Got any more deflection tweets or Ruparing links to distract from the dementia patient **** show sister? 🤡

And your air tight tweets are slipping not even blue checks from idiots like Rupar, just randos now 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and USAFgolferVol
#2,125
#2,125
hUTch2002 said:
There were manufactured facts between Strzok, Steele, Comey and others that set up Papadopoulus. They set it up well but it was indeed a set up. That’s the fact of it.
Click to expand...

More “if Chauvin killed Floyd that means he didn’t pass that fake $20” logic. It’s nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top