Ashli Babbitt’s Killer is a blm Militant

[JohnD13]

He shot a killed an UnArmed woman who stood 5 foot 2 inches tall and weighed 125 pounds.

Watch the video spanky

 

[JohnD13]

Say you are stupid without saying you are stupid.

KKK MUCH?

 

[hog88]

KKK MUCH?

Nah, I couldn’t qualify.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Say you are a racist without saying you are a racist

Another fake username?

 

[volinbham]

Justified shooting or fair game? Shooter of Ashli Babbitt makes shocking admission

 

[NorthDallas40]

Justified shooting or fair game? Shooter of Ashli Babbitt makes shocking admission

That asshat needs to keep talking.

Of all of the lines from Byrd, this one stands out: “I could not fully see her hands or what was in the backpack or what the intentions are.” So, Byrd admitted he did not see a weapon or an immediate threat from Babbitt beyond her trying to enter through the window. Nevertheless, Byrd boasted, "I know that day I saved countless lives." He ignored that Babbitt was the one person killed during the riot. (Two protesters died of natural causes and a third from an amphetamine overdose; one police officer died the next day from natural causes, and four officers have committed suicide since then.) No other officers facing similar threats shot anyone in any other part of the Capitol, even those who were attacked by rioters armed with clubs or other objects.

 

[loggervol]

It doesn't matter what a leftist hates or doesn't hate. As long as both of you land on "The behavior is wrong if I disagree with the person's beliefs and is right if I agree" then you are both equally repugnant.

Ok, but when is trespass worthy of a death sentence. Judge, jury, and executioner

 

[bamawriter]

Ok, but when is trespass worthy of a death sentence. Judge, jury, and executioner

I've never said that she deserved it.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Ok, but when is trespass worthy of a death sentence. Judge, jury, and executioner

Was this a serious question? How about a home invasion (even when the intruder is unarmed) in the middle of the night?

There is no doubt that Babbitt is being accorded more sympathy in this thread then would be the case for a young black woman shot to death by a white police officer, while trespassing on federal property, during a Black Lives Matter protest.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Was this a serious question? How about a home invasion (even when the intruder is unarmed) in the middle of the night?

There is no doubt that Babbitt is being accorded more sympathy in this thread then would be the case for a young black woman shot to death by a white police officer, while trespassing on federal property, during a Black Lives Matter protest.

So Castle Doctrine applies to a security guard? GTFO

Oh and hilarious race card play.

 

[BreatheUT]

Another fake username?

Where did BayVol go?

 

[Boston Vol]

Where did BayVol go?

Probably busy trying to find that utopia where he or she can live in “diversity and love.”

 

[BreatheUT]

Probably busy trying to find that utopia where he or she can live in “diversity and love.”

Short term troll or has changed usernames. I suspected they were someone else before that.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Where did BayVol go?

It was KTown King. I’m sure BayVol has another handle too

 

[BowlBrother85]

So Castle Doctrine applies to a security guard? GTFO

Oh and hilarious race card play.

The question which I responded to, was simply :

"Ok, but when is trespass worthy of a death sentence?"

No mention of the "castle doctrine" was ever made, either by myself or by the poster I was responding to. I did not draw any parallels between the example I cited (a home invasion late at night) and the shooting of Ashli Babbitt either. A simple question was posed, and I offered an obvious answer...

... and then observed that Babbitt was being accorded more sympathy than would ever be the case for a Black Lives Matter protestor, who was trespassing on federal property in the middle of a violent incursion.

 

[NorthDallas40]

The question which I responded to, was simply :

"Ok, but when is trespass worthy of a death sentence?"

No mention of the "castle doctrine" was ever made, either by myself or by the poster I was responding to. I did not draw any parallels between the example I cited (a home invasion late at night) and the shooting of Ashli Babbitt either. A simple question was posed, and I offered an obvious answer...

... and then observed that Babbitt was being accorded more sympathy than would ever be the case for a Black Lives Matter protestor, who was trespassing on federal property in the middle of a violent incursion.

Your reply was a demonstration of the castle doctrine you rube. That was how you responded to the question of basically a security guard choosing to shoot an unarmed trespasser.

And yes your stupid ass racist play was noted also.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Your reply was a demonstration of the castle doctrine you rube. That was how you responded to the question of basically a security guard choosing to shoot an unarmed trespasser.

And yes your stupid ass racist play was noted also.

Wrong. The poster who I responded to, simply asked a general question which was unrelated to the shooting of Ashli Babbitt. Basically, the question was :

"When would trespassing justify the use of deadly force?" ... and I gave an obvious example, while drawing no equations with the shooting of Babbitt.

You are hopelessly immature.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Wrong. The poster who I responded to, simply asked a general question which was unrelated to the shooting of Ashli Babbitt. Basically, the question was

"When would trespassing justify the use of deadly force?" ... and I gave an obvious example, while drawing no equations with the shooting of Babbitt.

You are hopelessly immature.

You are hopelessly incorrect. You equated a security guard shooting an unarmed trespasser to a citizen defending their own home against an intruder. That’s a really stupid example.

 

[BowlBrother85]

You are hopelessly incorrect. You equated a security guard shooting an unarmed trespasser to a citizen defending their own home against an intruder. That’s a really stupid example.

No, I didn't. I simply responded to this question:

"Ok, but when is trespass worthy of a death sentence?"

With this answer:

"How about a home invasion (even when the intruder is unarmed) in the middle of the night?"

While responding to that question, I did not reference the shooting of Ashli Babbitt at all, and neither did the poster I was replying to. I certainly did not draw any equation between those two circumstances.

 

[NorthDallas40]

No, I didn't. I simply responded to this question:

"Ok, but when is trespass worthy of a death sentence?"

With this answer:

"How about a home invasion (even when the intruder is unarmed) in the middle of the night?"

While responding to that question, I did not reference the shooting of Ashli Babbitt at all, and neither did the poster I was replying to. I certainly did not draw any equation between those two circumstances.

We can all see the context. It was in relation to a glorified security guard shooting an unarmed trespasser. You know … the point you acknowledged in the second paragraph of your stupid equivocation? So you made no equivocation in the first paragraph then invoked the case you’re claiming you aren’t making a comparison to in the second paragraph when you play the race card? Sounds legit.

 

[BowlBrother85]

We can all see the context. It was in relation to a glorified security guard shooting an unarmed trespasser. You know … the point you acknowledged in the second paragraph of your stupid equivocation? So you made no equivocation in the first paragraph then invoked the case you’re claiming you aren’t making a comparison to in the second paragraph when you play the race card? Sounds legit.

I answered a question in the first part, and then made a separate observation in the next part...

... and you can call it playing the race card if you want to, Babbitt has been shown more sympathy from the so-called "party of law and order" than would ever be shown a BLM protestor who had been killed under identical circumstances.

How many posts were there in the George Floyd thread, which went something like, "He would be alive today, if he had just been obeying the law," ... Why doesn't such logic apply to Babbitt?

 

[NorthDallas40]

I answered a question in the first part, and then made a separate observation in the next part...

... and you can call it playing the race card if you want to, Babbitt has been shown more sympathy from the so-called "party of law and order" than would ever be shown a BLM protestor who had been killed under identical circumstances.

How many posts were there in the George Floyd thread, which went something like, "He would be alive today, if he had just been obeying the law," ... Why doesn't such logic apply to Babbitt?

Ok sounds legit.

 

[tnmarktx]

I answered a question in the first part, and then made a separate observation in the next part...

... and you can call it playing the race card if you want to, Babbitt has been shown more sympathy from the so-called "party of law and order" than would ever be shown a BLM protestor who had been killed under identical circumstances.

How many posts were there in the George Floyd thread, which went something like, "He would be alive today, if he had just been obeying the law," ... Why doesn't such logic apply to Babbitt?

Do you believe that logic should've applied to that situation?

 

[whodeycin85]

sympathy from the so-called "party of law and order" than would ever be shown a BLM protestor who had been killed under identical circumstances.

Do you have an example of this??? I ask because during thr summer there were alot of Black people who trespassed and damage/burned down federal/state building without being shot??

shown more sympathy from the so-called "party of law and order" than would ever be shown a BLM protestor who had been killed under identical circumstances.

 

[loggervol]

Was this a serious question? How about a home invasion (even when the intruder is unarmed) in the middle of the night?

There is no doubt that Babbitt is being accorded more sympathy in this thread then would be the case for a young black woman shot to death by a white police officer, while trespassing on federal property, during a Black Lives Matter protest.

You know what I meant. You are just trying to change the narrative to fit your agenda.

Thanks for throwing in the race card though. When race shouldn’t matter in this situation. If he was working in or during the riots, he would have been called a Uncle Tom or a coon. Just because he was working with the police. Something to think about right..??