Scotty's Flat Top
I'm hurtin' Linda
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2011
- Messages
- 35,273
- Likes
- 1,803
As far as I can tell, Holly's teams are pretty much a clone of Pat's. Good defense, tough rebounding, terrible offense. Pat's teams won when she had a Parker or Holdsclaw to carry the offense, but without a player like that we could never do much on offense. The uncomfortable truth (IMO) is that things probably wouldn't have been that much different if Pat hadn't had any problems and was still the coach. Holly's coaching the same way Pat did. And other than Candace Parker, this is the way it's been for almost 20 years.
I've been taking Intro to Human Genetics for 3 weeks now online and this stuff is incredibly interesting. Basically the entire class is Nature vs Nurture but 10 weeks worth of it
I try to keep as current as an amateur can be with what's going on in that area, because it's about the most interesting topic there is. What I think is the conventional wisdom right now is: 1) it's way more nature than nurture, 2) parents are much less important than we'd all like to believe, and 3) what we think of as our personalities is mostly just chemistry. That what you're reading in this class too?