MemphisCanes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
- Messages
- 4,794
- Likes
- 51
I presented the facts, and you chose to ignore them. I don't care how you want to spin it. Tennessee hasn't won an SECT title since 1979 (not even under Pearl), yet still has 4 to Auburn's 1. Tennessee has 8 regular season titles while Auburn has 2. That is 12 total to 3 total. Believe whatever the hell you want, but that doesn't equate to the same.
"Each a handful of tournament appearances?" Tennessee has played in twice as many NCAAT games! How is that even close?
I can't argue with someone who ignores the facts. I would hate to see how you ignore them in the courtroom.
Tennessee's conference tournament "championships" are from 36, 41, 43 and 79. How many of those tourneys were you personally around to enjoy?
Since 1980, Tennessee has had only 3 regular season titles, one of which was under Pearl.
By my count, pre-Pearl, UT has gone to the dance 13 times? Auburn has been 8. No huge difference there.
UT had 3 Sweet 16s and no Elite 8s pre-Pearl, Auburn has 4 sweet 16s and no Elite 8s. No huge difference there.
Out of UT's 40 NCAA games, how many were pre-Pearl? 25 or so? Auburn has 20, no huge difference there.
You're couching your argument on titles from the 40s, 50s and 60s plus the fact that you play in Pat Summitt's arena to support the fact that, before Pearl, you were a much better program than Auburn. The rest of the country just didn't see it that way. Were you the better program, once you disect everything? Probably. Were UT and Auburn still on the same tier, program wise? Yes, there was not a material difference between the two.
Pearl changed things for UT, obviously, but that's my entire point.
Last edited: