bamawriter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2010
- Messages
- 26,079
- Likes
- 16,249
I've heard that argument, but it doesn't hold water.
The SEC bylaw only deals with the actions of the player or player's rep. It makes no qualification for the actions of the institution or institution's rep. Given the simple fact that the bylaw clarifies that both receiving and agreeing to receive are violations, solicitation has to be considered a part of the rule. Otherwise, the actions of the institution or institution's rep would be written into the bylaw since they would be required in order to qualify as "agreement".
The SEC bylaw only deals with the actions of the player or player's rep. It makes no qualification for the actions of the institution or institution's rep. Given the simple fact that the bylaw clarifies that both receiving and agreeing to receive are violations, solicitation has to be considered a part of the rule. Otherwise, the actions of the institution or institution's rep would be written into the bylaw since they would be required in order to qualify as "agreement".