bama don't deserve

#78
#78
How is '67 legit?

I mean I can get anywhere from 2 (51, 98) to 5 (38, 40, 50, 51, 98).

'40 isn't legit, either.

And before someone chimes in, I don't count Bama's title in 1941, so don't waste keystrokes.
 
Last edited:
#79
#79
'40 isn't legit, either.

And before someone chimes in, I don't don't count Bama's title in 1941, so don't waste keystrokes.

I mean, personally, I liked it better when the university only claimed 4 total (1938, 1950, 1951, 1998).

But I can at least see 1940 making more/ enough sense for an inclusion - or at least for arguments regarding such inclusion (given records) - than I can for 1967's inclusion.
 
#82
#82
Easily could have told Dr Pepper to shove it

Oh sure. Assuming we didn't want to actually accept the trophy. But since we did want the trophy, we had to sign the promotional contract that comes along with it.

I'm sure UT's so classy they would have said "Keep your trophy. We'd rather not have the crystal football than have it displayed at Wal-Mart."
 
#83
#83
I'm sure UT's so classy they would have said "Keep your trophy. We'd rather not have the crystal football than have it displayed at Wal-Mart."[/QUOTE said:
You're right.
 

VN Store



Back
Top