Bama tears

[sami]

The issue with CFB is too many teams and the fact that the teams from the B1G and SEC aren't required to play in the regular season.

Think NFL, you know a 12-5 team or 13-4 team is good because they played good teams. In college, there are too many frauds with 11-1, 12-0, 10-2 type records that don't play anyone.

I disagree that going to 9-10 conference games will solve it. The issue is you don't have SEC teams playing B1G teams, B1G teams playing ACC teams, etc. Not enough cross conference games.

IMO, SEC schedule should have 1 B1G team, 1 Big12/ACC, and 2 mid-majors or go to 9 conference games and reduce it to 1 mid-major.

Move mid-major leagues to FCS level. I am sorry, Boise State should NOT have gotten an autobid. If you can't average 50k fans a game, you need to move to FCS level. I a fan of taking MAC, Conf USA, Sunbelt, MWC, etc. and moving them to FCS level.

As long as there is this disparity in conference depth of quality, it won't matter what kind of schedule they go to. Let Big 10 teams play four Big 10 games and four SEC games, and we won't be seeing any 1 or 2-loss Big 10 teams. OOC games are irrelevant as long as the other three "Power 4" conferences are as far behind the SEC in quality depth of programs as they currently are.

 

[volbound1700]

As long as there is this disparity in conference depth of quality, it won't matter what kind of schedule they go to. Let Big 10 teams play four Big 10 games and four SEC games, and we won't be seeing any 1 or 2-loss Big 10 teams. OOC games are irrelevant as long as the other three "Power 4" conferences are as far behind the SEC in quality depth of programs as they currently are.

It would help eliminate the teams (or reduce the chances) like Indiana from making it in.

Had Indiana played Ole Miss and Ole Miss beat them, the CFB field looks different.