Basilio Said It Best

#227
#227
Fatman Photos said:
It doesn't matter if Martin's teams played 20 conference games, The last three years of Pearl is 48 games (29-19-0 .604) and Martin's first three years is 47 games so far (28-19-0 .596). There is only ONE game difference and practically the same stats. Also, Pearl's last 3 years total record is 78-37-0 (.678) and Martin's first three is 55-28-0 (.663). Real close. But I know some people hate facts and don't let them get in the way of their thinking. Like I said above " Not that I think that he is the answer for Tennessee's problems but wins are wins"
Click to expand...

Solid post
 
#229
#229
Fatman Photos said:
It doesn't matter if Martin's teams played 20 conference games, The last three years of Pearl is 48 games (29-19-0 .604) and Martin's first three years is 47 games so far (28-19-0 .596). There is only ONE game difference and practically the same stats. Also, Pearl's last 3 years total record is 78-37-0 (.678) and Martin's first three is 55-28-0 (.663). Real close. But I know some people hate facts and don't let them get in the way of their thinking. Like I said above " Not that I think that he is the answer for Tennessee's problems but wins are wins"
Click to expand...

Giving false stats and talking trash makes u look like an idiot. LOL
 
#230
#230
Fatman Photos said:
It doesn't matter if Martin's teams played 20 conference games, The last three years of Pearl is 48 games (29-19-0 .604) and Martin's first three years is 47 games so far (28-19-0 .596). There is only ONE game difference and practically the same stats. Also, Pearl's last 3 years total record is 78-37-0 (.678) and Martin's first three is 55-28-0 (.663). Real close. But I know some people hate facts and don't let them get in the way of their thinking. Like I said above " Not that I think that he is the answer for Tennessee's problems but wins are wins"
Click to expand...

Numbers don't lie, but this not to compare the coaches. Too many factors CCM success from his first three years with Pearl's players.

The fact that pearl has 23 more wins, doesn't play a factor in your data either is huge. 3 NCAA tourneys vs 2 NIT plays into this comparison. The fact that you left out the ten losses of this season destroys your argument.

I hope This post is not a true reflection of your work. The is a reason for 23 more wins. Try comparing strength of schedule and RPI for this period. It will tell you a lot.
 
#231
#231
Fatman Photos said:
It doesn't matter if Martin's teams played 20 conference games, The last three years of Pearl is 48 games (29-19-0 .604) and Martin's first three years is 47 games so far (28-19-0 .596). There is only ONE game difference and practically the same stats. Also, Pearl's last 3 years total record is 78-37-0 (.678) and Martin's first three is 55-28-0 (.663). Real close. But I know some people hate facts and don't let them get in the way of their thinking. Like I said above " Not that I think that he is the answer for Tennessee's problems but wins are wins"
Click to expand...

Were Bruce's wins back in the day when the SEC always had 5 or 6 teams in the tourney? Makes a big diff.
 
#232
#232
Sudden Impact said:
Numbers don't lie, but this not to compare the coaches. Too many factors CCM success from his first three years with Pearl's players.

The fact that pearl has 23 more wins, doesn't play a factor in your data either is huge. 3 NCAA tourneys vs 2 NIT plays into this comparison. The fact that you left out the ten losses of this season destroys your argument.

I hope This post is not a true reflection of your work. The is a reason for 23 more wins. Try comparing strength of schedule and RPI for this period. It will tell you a lot.
Click to expand...

yeah he added in the wins from this yr but not the losses.....that definitely helped his argument lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#233
#233
Fatman Photos said:
It doesn't matter if Martin's teams played 20 conference games, The last three years of Pearl is 48 games (29-19-0 .604) and Martin's first three years is 47 games so far (28-19-0 .596). There is only ONE game difference and practically the same stats. Also, Pearl's last 3 years total record is 78-37-0 (.678) and Martin's first three is 55-28-0 (.663). Real close. But I know some people hate facts and don't let them get in the way of their thinking. Like I said above " Not that I think that he is the answer for Tennessee's problems but wins are wins"
Click to expand...
you are either simply making numbers up or just not very good at math.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#234
#234
BP4Prez said:
you are either simply making numbers up or just not very good at math.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Well, he at least was on the right track.

Pearl 68-37 his last three years

Cuonzo 55-38 in three with 5 or 6 left to go plus tournaments.
 
#236
#236
Yes, I messed up my adding but still not as bad as everyone that has the Hotts for pearl makes it sound. Overall, Pearl's last three years is not much better than Martin's first three.
 
#239
#239
I just want to know why everyone thinks that Pearl is the ONLY ONE that can coach at Tennessee. I didn't know that he was the only real coach left.
 
#240
#240
HBCButch said:
Well, he at least was on the right track.

Pearl 68-37 his last three years

Cuonzo 55-38 in three with 5 or 6 left to go plus tournaments.
Click to expand...

Cuonzo is 54-39 taking out the Tusculum game for a 58% winning percentage. If the committee doesn't count D2 games we shouldn't either.
 
#241
#241
Fatman Photos said:
Yes, I messed up my adding but still not as bad as everyone that has the Hotts for pearl makes it sound. Overall, Pearl's last three years is not much better than Martin's first three.
Click to expand...

You do realize that the second of his last three he made an elite eight.......the only reason it's not as bad is bc of pearl's last yr which if it was typical of his coaching, no one would want pearl here either.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top