Sure. In the same light you can simply label a Ferrari and a Ford Pinto as "cars."
Worley wasn't even an average game manager last season. Not all of it was his fault and I predict he will be a decent game manager this season.
Let me ask you this, how would you label Worley if he came out this season and threw for 3000 yards, 28 TD's, and only 5 Ints? I'm guessing you'd rate him a bit higher than just a game manager.
Well with the team he was playing with, I would say yeah he was a playmaker. But McCarron and Clausen both had far superior OLs, WRs, RBs, defenses, and stability of the system/program. They simply had much better situations. Yet again, Worley has not proven to be better than either of them. Not even close, but you can't deny that those 2 guys were set up to succeed.
Just remember Clausen's recievers: Cedrick Wilson, Stallworth, Kelley Washington, Witten, James Banks, Chris Hannon, Leonard Scott, Tony Brown, Mark Jones, Swain, CJ Fayton, David Martin. Not to mention Henry, Stephens, Cedric Houston, Jabari Davis, Riggs Jr., Troy Fleming, Bartholomew, Larkins, Tinsley, etc. And much better OL play.
To me, those guys were more talented than what Worley has had to work with, not forgetting that Worley has played with some talented dudes (who were mostly young or inexperienced). However, Clausen's guys were definitely more consistent and experienced because we simply had a much more stable football program back then. Not to mention that we actually had some legit defenses that could shut good teams down and win a game for us.
I am excited to see what J. Worley can do this year because I think we actually have a group of skill players that can match the type of talent/depth we had back then. Yet we have to replace the entire OL... :banghead2: