I think this may be partly direct at me for the earlier post I made.
I have not and will not support Sanders or Hillary.
I have zero problem with a CEO that is making his company and stock holders money making all the money he,/she can. Reward those that do a good job.
I do have a problem with CEO that does a terrible job then leave with millions of dollars like the two CEO's I mentioned earlier.
When Carley Fiorina was at HP stock prices fell 50%, she gets fired and walks with 21 million dollars.
Bob Nardelli did a terrible job at Home Depot. It was reported he was literally hated. He walks away with 210 million dollars.
Their are plenty more examples if you would like to do a little research.
Please tell me how being against these terrible business practices is socialist.
When a CEO drives a company in the ground and walks with millions, who are they harming?
It is not the poor guy working low paying jobs, it is the investor that takes a hit.
Let's take HP. Millions of dollars was lost by investors yet the CEO was fired and walked away with $21 million with a big smile on her face?
You 2nd and 3rd are so full of fail, I don't have time to address that garbage.
Your last paragraph, can you please name any type of government where the top of the pyramid lives like the masses?
Not directed to you, but, here ya go.
On failed CEO's and the 2nd and 3rd being failed, what you do not understand is those products sold, and thus, the consumer is to blame.
You can consider those CEO's failures, yet, regardless of stock price or if he was "hated" the companies revenues grew meaning that the consumer...the consumer, still bought those products even though you can think the CEO did nothing to entice it. Further, the consumer bought those stocks. Maybe people should do a little more research so they don't put their money into companies that aren't going to gain a return on investment. Pretty simple. Socialism is just that, regulating free enterprise to succeed or fail not based on the free market. You railing against these companies or CEO's for making money for doing a job, whether you think it was right or not, is socialist. You wanting to dictate pay to any company is socialist. When the shareholder and BOD have had enough, people get fired. That's how it works.
On the 2nd and 3rd you see as garbage, why is it hard to understand that when people complain about the "man", yet, purchase their products makes them a hypocritical dunce who fails to understand their own feelings and emotions? If you complain about the big bad companies and spend your money on products you say you have issues towards, then you are the problem. Did you buy any Home Depot products while the "mean hated" man was CEO. If so, look in the mirror for your own disdain.
To the last question, this system!!!!!! The problem lies in the people who are running this system, nothing else. Career politicians instead of public service and volunteer. When they can't make a living being a politician, problem solved. Just as with the notion of being a hypocrite for buying products from the big bad 5A companies that one complains about, the notion here is simple. We the people are first to blame for allowing these other idiots to be voted into office time and again and never being held responsible. We complain, yet, 99% don't get involved. Couple that with corruptible self involved politicians and then our system doesn't work as it should.
So, combine the two and CONVICTION reigns supreme. You do not like a company, don't buy it's products. You don't like the government, do something about it. Stick to your convictions and don't be an emotional nimsy stuck in inactivity or just complaining to hear yourself complain.
You can think whatever you want. I don't care. You can have your opinion and no matter what I say, it doesn't matter. But, understand that as someone who has a MBA from The Kellogg School of Management (if you have to look it up then you might be out of touch) and who was accepted into Booth and Wharton, I fully understand what I'm talking about.